Advertisement

Virtual Worlds for Virtual Organizing

  • Diana Rhoten
  • Wayne Lutters
Chapter
Part of the Human-Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

The members and resources of a virtual organization are dispersed across time and space, yet they function as a coherent entity through the use of technologies, networks, and alliances. As virtual organizations proliferate and become increasingly important in society, many may exploit the technical architecture s of virtual worlds, which are the confluence of computer-mediated communication, telepresence, and virtual reality originally created for gaming. A brief socio-technical history describes their early origins and the waves of progress followed by stasis that brought us to the current period of renewed enthusiasm. Examination of contemporary examples demonstrates how three genres of virtual worlds have enabled new arenas for virtual organizing: developer-defined closed worlds, user-modifiable quasi-open worlds, and user-generated open worlds. Among expected future trends are an increase in collaboration born virtually rather than imported from existing organizations, a tension between high-fidelity recreations of the physical world and hyper-stylized imaginations of fantasy worlds, and the growth of specialized worlds optimized for particular sectors, companies, or cultures.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Virtual World Virtual Organization Collaborative Virtual Environment Sociotechnical System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Achterbosch, L., Pierce, R., & Simmons, G. (2008). Massively multiplayer online role-playing games: The past, present, and future. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 5(4): article 9.Google Scholar
  2. Balkin, J., & Noveck, B. (eds). (2006). The state of play: Law and virtual worlds. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartle, R. (2006). Designing virtual worlds. New York: New Riders Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Benkler, Y. (1992). Coase’s Pengion, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112, 369-446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biocca, F. (1992). Communication within virtual reality: Crating a space for research. Journal of Communication, 42, 5-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleecker, S. E. (1994, March-April). The virtual organization. The Futurist, 28, 9-12.Google Scholar
  7. Bompbard, P. (2007). Gospel 2.0: Jesuits move into Second Life. Financial Times, July 26. Last retrieved May 1, 2009, (http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ceae9c60-3ba8-11dc-8002-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check = 1)
  8. Cajvaneanu, D. (2007). Virtual worlds: A political incubator. ACM SIGMIS Database, 38, 104-105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohill, A. M., & Kavanaugh, A. L. (eds). (2000). Community networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia. Norwood, MA: Artech House.Google Scholar
  10. Correll, S. (1995). The ethnography of an electronic bar: The lesbian cafe. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24, 270-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coyle, J., & Schnarr, N. (1995). The soft-side challenges of the virtual corporation. Human Resource Planning, 18, 41-42.Google Scholar
  12. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cummings, J., Finholt, T., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Lawrence, K., & Rhoten, D. (2008). Beyond being there: A blueprint for advancing the design, development, and evaluation of virtual organizations. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Damer, B., Gold, S., de Bruin, J., & de Bruin, D.-J. (2000). Conferences and trade shows in inhabited virtual worlds: A case study of Avatars 98 & 99. In J.-C. Heudin (Ed.), Virtual worlds: Proceedings from Second International Conference. Paris: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Davidow, W., & Malone, M. (1992). The virtual corporation: Structuring and revitalizing the corporation for the 21st century. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  16. Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R. (2007). The life and death of online gaming communities: A look at guilds in World of Warcraft. In Proceedings from 25th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 839-848). San Jose, CA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, J., Luther, K., Bessiere, K., & Kellogg, W. A. (2008). Games for virtual team building. In Proceedings of ACM DIS 2008 Conference on Designing Interactive System (pp. 295-304). Cape Town, South Africa: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gaver, W., Moran, T., MacLean, A., Lövstrand, L., Dourish, P., Carter, K., & Buxton, W. (1992). Realizing a video environment: EuroPARC’s RAVE system. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 27-35). Monterey, CA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  19. Giuliano, V. (1982). The mechanization of office work. Scientific American, 247, 148-164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenhalgh, C., & Benford, S. (1995). MASSIVE: A distributed virtual reality system incorporating spatial trading. In Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (DCS’95), Vancouver, Canada, May 30-June 2.Google Scholar
  21. Grenier, R., & Metes, G. (1995). Going virtual: Moving your organization into the 21st century. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Hedberg, B. B., & Dahlgren, G. (1997). Virtual organizations and beyond discover imaginary systems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 119-125). Monterey, CA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  24. Isaacs, E. A. (1998). Microcosm: Support for virtual communities via an on-line graphical environment. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (CHI)’98 (pp. 5-6). Los Angeles, CA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  25. Jakobsson, M. (2003). A virtual realist primer to virtual world design. In P. Ehn & J. Löwgren (Eds.), Searching voices - towards a canon for interaction design. Studies in Arts and Communication #01. Malmö, Sweden: Malmö University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kim, J. Y., Allen, J. P., & Lee, E. (2008). Alternate reality gaming. In Communications of the ACM (pp. 36-42). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kobayashi, M., & Ishii, H. (1993). ClearBoard: A novel shared drawing medium that supports gaze awareness in remote collaboration. In IEICE Transactions on Communications, Institute of Electronics (Vol. E76-B, pp. 609-617). Tokyo: Information and Communication Engineers of Japan (IEICE).Google Scholar
  28. Lakhani, K., & Panetta, J. (2007). The principles of distributed innovation. Innovations, 2, 97-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Working across space, time, and organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Mackay, W. (1999). Media spaces: Environments for informal multimedia interaction. In X. Beaudouin-Lafon (Ed.), Computer-supported co-operative work, trends in software series (pp. 55-82). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. McCarthy, C. (2009). Second Life cracks whip on adult content. CNet News, April 21. Last retrieved May 1, 2009, (http://news.cnet.com/the-social/?keyword = virtual + worlds)
  32. Morningstar, C., & Farmer, F. R. (1991). The lessons of Lucasfilm’s habitat. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps (pp. 273-301). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mowshowitz, A. (1994). Virtual organization: A vision of management in the Information Age. The Information Society, 10, 267-294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’ Mahony, S. (2008, November). Using differentiation to establish organizational boundaries in the burning man and open source communities. Philadelphia, PA: Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action.Google Scholar
  35. O’Day, V. L., Bobrow, D. G., & Shirley, M. (1996). The socio-technical design circle. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (pp. 160-169). New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  36. O’Leary, M., Orlikowski, W., & Yates, J. (2002). Distributed work over the centuries: Trust and control in the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670-1826. In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 27-54). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  38. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
  39. Rhoten, Diana. (2004). “Interdisciplinary Research: Trend or Transition?” Items and Issues 5(1):6-11.Google Scholar
  40. Schroeder, R. (1996). Possible worlds: The social dynamic of virtual reality technologies. Boulder, CO: West View.Google Scholar
  41. Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  42. Sifakis, C. (1999). The mafia encyclopedia. New York: Checkmark Books.Google Scholar
  43. Sutton, K. (2007). Going to church in Second Life. UU World Magazine, February 19. Last Retrieved May1, 2009, (http://www.uuworld. org/life/ articles /16206.shtml)
  44. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net-surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village (pp. 331-366). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, C. (2008). Avatars, virtual reality technology and the U.S. military: Emerging policy issues. CRS Report for Congress (RS22857, April 9).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Rhoten
    • 1
  • Wayne Lutters
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Science Research CouncilBrooklynUSA
  2. 2.University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations