Skip to main content

Analyzing the Required Actions Prescribed in Emergency Tasks

  • Chapter
The Complexity of Proceduralized Tasks

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

  • 488 Accesses

Abstract

As stated at the end of Chap. 4, the complexity of proceduralized tasks should be quantifiable by the concept of graph entropies if we construct a series of graphs representing the features of five kinds of complexity factors. In some respect, this requirement seems to be easily fulfilled because, for example, an ACG is directly comparable to the control flow graph of software. This implies that the effects of two kinds of complexity factors on the complexity of proceduralized tasks might be quantified from the ACG. That is, the first-order entropy of the ACG represents the contribution of logical entanglement on the complexity of proceduralized tasks, while the second-order entropy represents the contribution from the number of actions to be conducted by qualified operators. Unfortunately, we still need three more graphs that are able to characterize the remaining complexity factors: (1) the amount of information to be processed by qualified operators, (2) the amount of domain knowledge, and (3) the level of engineering decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bainbridge L (1997) The change in concepts needed to account for human behavior in complex dynamic tasks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 27(3):351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovair S, Kieras DE (1996) Toward a model of acquiring procedures from text. In: Barr R, Pearson PD, Kamil ML, Mosenthal PB (eds) Handbook of Reading Research, Erlbaum, London, vol 2, pp.206–229

    Google Scholar 

  • DOD (1999) Human engineering program process and procedures. Mil-HDBK-46855A

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE (1998) Writer’s guide for technical procedures. DOE-STD-1029-92

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty E (1992) SRK – it just keeps on a rollin’. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 38:253–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glossary (2008). Glossary of Terms. http://www.neiu.edu/~dbehrlic/hrd408/glossary.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (1993a) The phenotype of erroneous actions. Int J Man-Mach Stud 39:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang JJ, Klein G (2000) Side effects of decision guidance in decision support systems. Interact Comput 12:469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1985) Effort and accuracy in choice. Manage Sci 31:395–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung W (2001) Structured information analysis for human reliability assessment of emergency tasks in nuclear power plants. PhD Dissertation, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, South Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Park JC, Lee YH, Oh IS, Lee HC, Jang TI, Kim, Kim DH, Hwang SH, Park JK, Kim JS (2008) Development of the digital reactor safety system. KAERI/RR-2909, Daejeon, South Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Moray N (1998) Identifying mental models of complex human-machine systems. Int J Ind Ergonom 22:293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Jung W, Kim J, Ha J (2005) Analysis of human performance observed under simulated emergencies of nuclear power plants. KAERI/TR-2895, Daejeon, South Korea

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1974) The human data processor as a system component: bits and pieces of a model. Risø-M-1722, Risø Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1976) Outlines of a hybrid model of the process plant operator. In: Sheridan TB, Johanssen G (eds) Monitoring Behavior and Supervisory Control, Plenum, New York, pp. 371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human-machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugan SM (1980) The cost of thinking. J Consumer Res 7(2):99–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spence JW, Tsai RJ (1997) On human cognition and the design of information systems. Inf Manage 32:73–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todd P, Benbasat I (2000) Inducing compensatory information processing through decision aids that facilitate effort reduction: an experimental assessment. J Behav Decis Mak 13:91–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman DG, D’Ambrosio B (1995) A taxonomy for classifying engineering decision problems and support systems. In: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Corvalis, OR, vol 2, pp. 627–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive and Healthy Computerbased Work. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster’s 2008 New Millennium Dictionary of English Preview Edition (v.0.9.7) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/action verb

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Analyzing the Required Actions Prescribed in Emergency Tasks. In: The Complexity of Proceduralized Tasks. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-791-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-791-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-790-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-791-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics