Skip to main content

Significant Complexity Factors

  • Chapter
The Complexity of Proceduralized Tasks

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

  • 484 Accesses

Abstract

As shown in the previous chapter, we have to develop a novel framework to evaluate the complexity of proceduralized tasks. To this end, it is natural to start by identifying what factors make the performance of proceduralized tasks complicated. In other words, instead of many complexity factors pertaining to CR, WR, and CMP, it is necessary to consider different factors that could annoy people by demanding additional cognitive resources for TP. For this reason, many works dealing with causal factors regarding the complexity of a proceduralized task have been reviewed. As a result, a total of nine categories of complexity factors were ddistinguished. In this chapter, I would like to explain the meaning as well as the characteristics of each category. It is to be noted that, in the course of this literature survey, two basic principles have been applied to the selection of complexity factors. Therefore, before explaining task complexity factors, it is helpful to clarify the basic principles that I have adopted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen JA, Teague RC, Carter RE (1996) The effects of network size and fault intermittency on troubleshooting performance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A: Syst Hum 26(1):125–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Boy GA, Brito G (2000) Toward a categorization of factors related to procedure following and situation awareness. In: International Conference on Human Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (HCI-Aero’00), Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: a review and analysis. Acad Manage Rev 13(1):40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DJ, Gingrich KF (1986) The interactive effects of task complexity and participation on task performance: a field experiment. Organizat Behav Hum Decis Processes 38:162–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen O (2003) Decision modeling and acceptance criteria. Structu Saf 25:165–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacko JA, Salvendy G (1996) Hierarchical menu design: breadth, depth and task complexity. Percept Mot Skills 82:1187–1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang JJ, Klein G (2000) Side effects of decision guidance in decision support systems. Interact Comput 12:469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannsen G, Levis AH, Stassen HG (1994) Theoretical problems in man-machine systems and their experimental validation. Automatica 30:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1985) Effort and accuracy in choice. Manage Sci 31:395–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH (2000) Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educat Technol Res Develop 48(4):63–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieras D, Polson PG (1985) An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. Int J Man-Machine Stud 22:365–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch R, Gallanti M (1992) Task classification for knowledge-based systems in industrial automation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leplat J (1998) Task complexity in work situations. In: Goodstein LP, Anderson HB, Olsen SE (eds) Tasks, Errors and Mental Models, Taylor and Francis, London, pp.105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Wieringa PA (2000) Understanding perceived complexity in human supervisory control. Cognit Technol Work 2:75–88

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liao C, Palvia PC (2000) The impact of data models and task complexity on end-user performance: an experimental investigation. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 52:831–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard DC, Hakel MD (1997) Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Hum Perform 10(4):303–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris NM, Rouse WB (1985) Review and evaluation of empirical research in troubleshooting. Hum Factors 27(5):503–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Jung W, Jung K (2008) The effect of two complexity factors on the performance of emergency tasks - an experimental verification. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 93:350–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse WB (1978) Human problem solving performance in a fault diagnosis task. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8(4):258–271

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse WB, Rouse SH (1979) Measures of complexity of fault diagnosis task. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(11):720–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck P Gundlach W (1989) Reduction of mental effort in tasks of different complexity. In: Klix F, Streitz NA, Waern Y, Wandke H (eds) Man-computer Interaction Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugan SM (1980) The cost of thinking. J Consumer Res 7(2):99–111

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sintchenko V, Coiera E (2002) Which clinical decision benefit from automation? A task complexity approach. In: Surjan G, Engelbrecht R, McNair P (eds) Proceedings of MIE2002, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp.639–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangler WE and Peters JM (2001) A model of distributed knowledge and action in complex systems. Decis Support Syst 31:103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stassen HG, Johannsen G, Moray N (1990) Internal representation, internal model, human performance model and mental workload. Automatica 26(4):811–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom GA (1993) Towards models of tasks and task complexity in supervisory control applications. Ergonomics 36:1413–1423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson E, Angelbrog-Thandrez M, Sjoberg L, Olsson S (1997) Information complexity – mental workload and performance in combat aircraft. Ergonomics 40:362–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwell PJ (1994) What defines complexity? In: Robertson SA (ed) Contemporary Ergonomics: Ergonomics for All, Taylor and Francis, London, pp.89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk Z (2001) Multimedia: providing students with real world experiences. Automat Construction 10(2):247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eekhout JM, Rouse WB (1981) Human errors in detection, diagnosis and compensation for failures in the engine control room of a super tanker. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 11(12):813–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright P, Pocock S, Fields B (1998) The prescription and practice of work on the flight deck. In: Green TRG, Bannon L, Warren CP, Buckley J (eds) 9th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Limerick University Press, Limerick, Ireland, pp.37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood RE (1986) Task complexity: definition of the construct. Organizat Behav Hum Decis Processes 37:60–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood RE, Locke EA (1990) Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks. Res Organizat Behav 12:73–109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Significant Complexity Factors. In: The Complexity of Proceduralized Tasks. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-791-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-791-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-790-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-791-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics