Abstract
As shown in the previous chapter, we have to develop a novel framework to evaluate the complexity of proceduralized tasks. To this end, it is natural to start by identifying what factors make the performance of proceduralized tasks complicated. In other words, instead of many complexity factors pertaining to CR, WR, and CMP, it is necessary to consider different factors that could annoy people by demanding additional cognitive resources for TP. For this reason, many works dealing with causal factors regarding the complexity of a proceduralized task have been reviewed. As a result, a total of nine categories of complexity factors were ddistinguished. In this chapter, I would like to explain the meaning as well as the characteristics of each category. It is to be noted that, in the course of this literature survey, two basic principles have been applied to the selection of complexity factors. Therefore, before explaining task complexity factors, it is helpful to clarify the basic principles that I have adopted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen JA, Teague RC, Carter RE (1996) The effects of network size and fault intermittency on troubleshooting performance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A: Syst Hum 26(1):125–132
Boy GA, Brito G (2000) Toward a categorization of factors related to procedure following and situation awareness. In: International Conference on Human Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (HCI-Aero’00), Toulouse
Campbell DJ (1988) Task complexity: a review and analysis. Acad Manage Rev 13(1):40–52
Campbell DJ, Gingrich KF (1986) The interactive effects of task complexity and participation on task performance: a field experiment. Organizat Behav Hum Decis Processes 38:162–180
Ditlevsen O (2003) Decision modeling and acceptance criteria. Structu Saf 25:165–191
Jacko JA, Salvendy G (1996) Hierarchical menu design: breadth, depth and task complexity. Percept Mot Skills 82:1187–1201
Jiang JJ, Klein G (2000) Side effects of decision guidance in decision support systems. Interact Comput 12:469–481
Johannsen G, Levis AH, Stassen HG (1994) Theoretical problems in man-machine systems and their experimental validation. Automatica 30:217–231
Johnson EJ, Payne JW (1985) Effort and accuracy in choice. Manage Sci 31:395–414
Jonassen DH (2000) Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educat Technol Res Develop 48(4):63–85
Kieras D, Polson PG (1985) An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity. Int J Man-Machine Stud 22:365–394
Leitch R, Gallanti M (1992) Task classification for knowledge-based systems in industrial automation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22:142–152
Leplat J (1998) Task complexity in work situations. In: Goodstein LP, Anderson HB, Olsen SE (eds) Tasks, Errors and Mental Models, Taylor and Francis, London, pp.105–115
Li K, Wieringa PA (2000) Understanding perceived complexity in human supervisory control. Cognit Technol Work 2:75–88
Liao C, Palvia PC (2000) The impact of data models and task complexity on end-user performance: an experimental investigation. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 52:831–845
Maynard DC, Hakel MD (1997) Effects of objective and subjective task complexity on performance. Hum Perform 10(4):303–330
Morris NM, Rouse WB (1985) Review and evaluation of empirical research in troubleshooting. Hum Factors 27(5):503–530
Park J, Jung W, Jung K (2008) The effect of two complexity factors on the performance of emergency tasks - an experimental verification. Reliabil Eng Syst Saf 93:350–362
Rouse WB (1978) Human problem solving performance in a fault diagnosis task. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 8(4):258–271
Rouse WB, Rouse SH (1979) Measures of complexity of fault diagnosis task. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(11):720–727
Schmuck P Gundlach W (1989) Reduction of mental effort in tasks of different complexity. In: Klix F, Streitz NA, Waern Y, Wandke H (eds) Man-computer Interaction Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Shugan SM (1980) The cost of thinking. J Consumer Res 7(2):99–111
Sintchenko V, Coiera E (2002) Which clinical decision benefit from automation? A task complexity approach. In: Surjan G, Engelbrecht R, McNair P (eds) Proceedings of MIE2002, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp.639–648
Spangler WE and Peters JM (2001) A model of distributed knowledge and action in complex systems. Decis Support Syst 31:103–125
Stassen HG, Johannsen G, Moray N (1990) Internal representation, internal model, human performance model and mental workload. Automatica 26(4):811–820
Sundstrom GA (1993) Towards models of tasks and task complexity in supervisory control applications. Ergonomics 36:1413–1423
Svensson E, Angelbrog-Thandrez M, Sjoberg L, Olsson S (1997) Information complexity – mental workload and performance in combat aircraft. Ergonomics 40:362–380
Thelwell PJ (1994) What defines complexity? In: Robertson SA (ed) Contemporary Ergonomics: Ergonomics for All, Taylor and Francis, London, pp.89–94
Turk Z (2001) Multimedia: providing students with real world experiences. Automat Construction 10(2):247–255
Van Eekhout JM, Rouse WB (1981) Human errors in detection, diagnosis and compensation for failures in the engine control room of a super tanker. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 11(12):813–816
Wright P, Pocock S, Fields B (1998) The prescription and practice of work on the flight deck. In: Green TRG, Bannon L, Warren CP, Buckley J (eds) 9th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Limerick University Press, Limerick, Ireland, pp.37–42
Wood RE (1986) Task complexity: definition of the construct. Organizat Behav Hum Decis Processes 37:60–82
Wood RE, Locke EA (1990) Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks. Res Organizat Behav 12:73–109
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2009). Significant Complexity Factors. In: The Complexity of Proceduralized Tasks. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-791-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-791-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-790-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-791-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)