Skip to main content

Modelling Back-end Issues in Manufacturing

  • Chapter
Dynamic Modelling for Supply Chain Management
  • 1903 Accesses

Abstract

Simulation has been frequently used in manufacturing because it allows alternative designs and control policies to be tried out on the model during the preparatory phase of the physical plant. It helps to reduce cost and risk of large scale errors. Simulation approaches are also used during the operational phase of the manufacturing plants to find better ways to operate, and these studies may be one point in time exercises or may be part of a periodic check on the running of the system [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pidd M, (2003) Tools for thinking. Modelling in management science. 2nd. Edition. Chichester. England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ignizio JP, (2004) Optimal maintenance headcount allocation: An application of Chebyshev goal programming. International Journal of Production Research, 42(1): 201–210.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Crespo Márquez A, Sánchez Herguedas A, (2002) Models for maintenance optimisation: A study for repairable systems and finite time periods. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 75(3). 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerstbakh IB, (1976) Sufficient optimality conditions for control-limit policy in a semi-Markov model. Journal Of Applied Probability, 13: 400–406.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerstbakh IB, (1977) Models of preventive maintenance. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerstbakh IB, (2000) Reliability theory. With applications to preventive maintenance. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Papazoglou IA, (2000) Semi-Markovian reliability models for systems with testable components and general test/outage times. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 47: 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Becker G, Camarinopoulos L and Zioutas G, (1999) A Semi-Markovian model allowing for inhomogenities with respect to process time. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 70(1): 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abboud NE, (2001) A Discrete-time Markov production-inventory model with machine breakdowns. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 39: 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell JD, Jardine AKS, (2001) Maintenance excellence: Optimizing equipment life-cycle decisions. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dekker R and Groenendijk W, (1995) Availability Assessment Methods and their application in Practice. Microelectron Reliability, 35(9–10): 1257–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Scarf PA, (1997) On the application of mathematical models in maintenance. European Journal of Operational Research, 99: 493–506.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellman R, (1957) Dynamic Programming. Princeton. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howard RA, (1960) Markov processes and dynamic programming. New York: Technology Press and Wiley Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yao X, Fernandez-Gaucherand E, Fu MC and Marcus SI, (2004) Optimal preventive maintenance scheduling in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 17 (3): 345–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoyland A, Rausand M, (2004) System reliability theory. Models, statistical methods and applications. Wiley Series in probability and Statistics. New Jersey. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marseguerra M, Zio E, (2000) Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo Simulation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 68: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hopp WJ, Spearman ML, (1996) Factory physics. Foundations of manufacturing management. Chicago: IRWIN.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hopp WJ, Pati N, Jones PC, (1989) Optimal inventory control in a production flow system with failures. International Journal of Production Research, 27: 1367–1384.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsu LF, (1999) Simultaneous determination of preventive maintenance and replacement policies in a queue-like production system with minimal repair. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 63(2): 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu B, Cao J, (1999) Analysis of a production-inventory system with machine breakdowns and shutdowns. Computers and Operations Research, 26: 73–91.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Simon JT, Hopp WJ, (1995) Throughput and average inventory in discrete balanced assembly systems. IIE Transactions, 267: 368–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Der Duyn Schouten FA, Vanneste SG, (1995) Maintenance optimisation of a production system with buffer capacity. European Journal of Operations Research, 82: 323–338.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Crespo Marquez A, Gupta JND, Sánchez Herguedas A (2003) Maintenance policies for a production system with constrained production rate and buffer capacity. International Journal of Production Research, 41 (9): 1909–1926.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Andijani A, Duffuaa S, (2002). Critical evaluation of simulation studies in maintenance systems. Production Planning and Control, 13(4): 336–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marseguerra M, Zio E (2002) Basics of the Monte Carlo method with applications to system reliability. Hagen. Germany: LiLoLe-Verlag GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vensim, Version 5.4. (2004) Ventana Systems inc. Harvard. Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2010). Modelling Back-end Issues in Manufacturing. In: Dynamic Modelling for Supply Chain Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-681-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-681-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-680-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-681-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics