Skip to main content
  • 636 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes in detail how LCIA calculations can be performed in practice to compare interconnection materials. Several software programs are discussed with special emphasis on the Excel-based software EMLCA. One possible methodology for performing an LCIA of interconnection materials is presented. Concerning consequential LCA, a procedure for identifying marginal consumers is proposed. This text makes a summary of the important issues regarding the remaining needs for carrying out a successful consequential LCA in practice. The effect on the markets of Pb, Ag, Sn, and Bi as a result of the Pb-free shift is explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haapala KR, Rivera JL, Sutherland JW (2008) Application of life cycle assessment tools to sustainable product design and manufacturing. Int J Innov Comput, Inform Control 4:575–589

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ciroth A (2007) ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA – a new open source software for life cycle assessment. Int J LCA 12:209–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrae ASG (2005) Environmental life-cycle assessment in microelectronics packaging. PhD thesis, Chalmers University, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lu W (2006) Study on the advanced technique of environmental assessment based on life cycle assessment using matrix method. PhD thesis, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sullivan CR (1994) Energy use: the most important impact of electronic equipment? Proc. IEEE Int Symp Electron Environ, 2–4 May, San Fransisco, CA, 261–266

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frischknecht R, Rebitzer G (2005) The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive webbased LCA database. J Clean Prod 13:1337–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolf MA (2008) Supporting life cycle based policies and applications in industry with recommended LCI practice and the ELCD-consistent LCI data network. Pres at SETAC Europe Annual Meet, May 25–29, Warzaw, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huisman J, Stevels ALN, Stobbe I (2004) Eco-efficiency considerations on the end-of-life of consumer electronic products. IEEE Trans Electron Packag Manuf 27:9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ekvall T, Andrae ASG (2006) Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead-free solders. Int J LCA 11:344–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lesage P, Deschenes L, Samson, R (2007) Evaluating holistic environmental consequences of brownfield management options using consequential life cycle assessment for different perspectives. Environmental Management 40:323–337

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sandén, BA, Karlstrom M (2007) Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 15 :1469–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eriksson O, Finnveden G, Ekvall T et al (2007) Life cycle assessment of fuels for district heating: A comparison of waste incineration, biomass- and natural gas combustion. Energy Policy 35:1346–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomassen MA, Dalgaard R, Heijungs R et al (2008) Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. Int J LCA 13:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Newcomer A, Blumsack SA, Apt J et al (2008) Short run effects of a price on carbon dioxide emissions from US electric generators. Environ Sci Technol 42:3139–3144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hübler O, Frohn J (2007) Modern econometric analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weidema BP, Frees N, Nielsen AM (1999) Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories. Int J LCA 4:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J LCA 9:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lanzano T, Bertram M, De Palo M et al (2006) The contemporary European silver cycle. Resour Conserv Recycl 46:27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Naumov A (2007) World market of bismuth: a review. Russ J Non-Ferr Met 48:10–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendrickson CT, Lave LB, Matthews HS (2006) Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: an input–output approach. Resources for the Future Press

    Google Scholar 

  21. Park PJ, Tahara K (2008) Quantifying producer and consumer-based eco-efficiencies for the identification of key ecodesign issues. J Clean Prod 16:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) The computational structure of life cycle assessment, Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2010). Methodology. In: Global Life Cycle Impact Assessments of Material Shifts. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-661-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-661-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-660-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-661-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics