Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

  • 1566 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews and discusses the basic issues and principles of risk management, including:

• Risk acceptability (tolerability)

• Risk reduction and the ALARP principle

• Cautionary and precautionary principles

and presents a case study showing the importance of these issues and principles in a practical management context. Before we take a closer look, let us briefly address some basic features of risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Apostolakis G (1990) The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems. Science 250:1359–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolakis GE, Lemon DM (2005) A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism. Risk Analysis 24(2):361–376

    Google Scholar 

  • AS/NZS 4360 (2004) Australian/New Zealand Standard: Risk management

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven T (2003) Foundations of risk analysis – A knowledge and decision oriented perspective. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T (2006) On the precautionary principle, in the context of different perspectives on risk. Risk Management: an International Journal 8:192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T (2007a) A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis and management covering both safety and security. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92:745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T (2007b) On the ethical justification for the use of risk acceptance criteria. Risk Analysis 27:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven, T (2008a) Risk Analysis. Wiley, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven T (2008b) A semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis, as an alternative to QRAs. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93:768 –775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Abrahamsen EB (2007) On the use of cost–benefit analysis in ALARP processes. International Journal of Performability Engineering 3:345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Flage, R (2009) Use of decision criteria based on expected values to support decision-making in a production assurance and safety setting. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 94:1491–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Kristensen V (2005) Perspectives on risk – Review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 90:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Renn O (2008a) On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. J. Risk Research. To appear

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven, T, Renn, O (2008b) The role of quantitative risk assessments for characterizing risk and uncertainty and delineating appropriate risk management options, with special emphasis on terrorism risk. Risk Analysis. To appear

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Vinnem, JE (2007) Risk management, with applications from the offshore oil and gas industry. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Vinnem JE (2005) On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 90:15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, et al. (1981) Acceptable risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond J, Keeney R, Raiffa H (1999) Smart choices: A practical guide to making better decisions. Havard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • HES (2001) Reducing risk, protecting people. HES Books, ISBN 0 71762151 0

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE (2006) Offshore installations (safety case) regulations 2005 regulation 12 demonstrating compliance with the relevant statutory provisions

    Google Scholar 

  • IRGC (International Risk Governance Council) (2005) Risk governance – Towards an integrative approach, White Paper no 1, Renn O with an Annex by Graham P, IRGC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2002) Risk management vocabulary. ISO/IEC Guide 73

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R (1992) Value-focused thinking. A path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley D (1985) Making decisions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfstedt RE (2003) The precautionary principle: Risk, regulation and politics. Trans IchemE 81:36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • PSA (2001) Risk management regulations. Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSA), Stavanger

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn O (2008) Risk governance. Earthscan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa EA (1998) Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk Journal of Risk Research 1:15–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa EA (2003) The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF); Metatheoretical foundations and policy implications. In: Pidgeon N, Kasperson RE, Slovic P (eds) The social amplification of risk, pp 47–79. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandin P (1999) Dimensions of the precautionary principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5:889–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCED (1992) Rio declaration on environment and development. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). www.unep.org/Documents/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aven, T. (2010). Risk Management. In: Grimvall, G., Holmgren, Å., Jacobsson, P., Thedéen, T. (eds) Risks in Technological Systems. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-641-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-641-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-640-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-641-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics