W. Ross Ashby

  • Magnus Ramage
  • Karen Shipp

Ross Ashby was a deeply original thinker, who produced innovative work in a number of different areas. He was a psychiatrist by training, and his core concern was in understanding how the mind and brain worked, to find “what principles must be followed when one attempts to restore normal function to a sick organism that is, as a human patient, of fearful complexity” (Ashby 1956, p. vii). The pursuit of this goal led him to advance the field of cybernetics very significantly. His influence on the field, both in his own time and to the present day, has been considerable.

References

  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Ashby, W. R. (1928–1972). Journal (25 vols). Online version 2008, The W. Ross Ashby Digital Archive. http://www.rossashby.info/journal. Accessed 13 Jan 2009.
  3. Ashby, W.R. (1940). Adaptiveness and equilibrium. Journal of Mental Science, 86, 478–484.Google Scholar
  4. Ashby, W.R. (1947). Principles of the self-organizing dynamic system. The Journal of General Psychology, 37, 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashby, W. R. (1958). General systems theory as a new discipline. General Systems, 3, 1–6.Google Scholar
  7. Ashby, W. R. (1960). Design for a brain: The origin of adaptive dehaviour (2nd edition). London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Beer, S. (1973). Obituary: Professor W. Ross Ashby. Operational Research Quarterly, 24(1), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beer, S. (1974). Designing freedom. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Conant, R. (1974). W. Ross Ashby. International Journal of General Systems, 1, 4–7.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hammond, D. (2003). The science of synthesis: Exploring the social implications of general systems theory. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  12. McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Pangaro, P. (1988). New order from old: The rise of second-order cybernetics and implications for machine intelligence. Unpublished manuscript. http://www.pangaro.com/NOFO/index.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2009.
  14. Pickering, A. (2005). A gallery of monsters: Cybernetics and self-organisation, 1940–1970. In S. Franchi and G. Güzeldere (Eds.), Mechanical bodies, computational minds: Artificial intelligence from automata to cyborgs (pp. 229–245). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pickering, A. (2002). Cybernetics and the mangle: Ashby, Beer and Pask. Social Studies of Science, 32(3), 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosenbleuth, A., Wiener, N., Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Time (1949). The thinking machine. Time, 24 Jan 1949.Google Scholar
  18. Wheeler, M., Bullock, S., Di Paolo, E., Noble, J., Bedau, M., Husbands, P., Kirby, S., Seth, A. (2002). The view from elsewhere: Perspectives on a life modeling. Artificial Life, 8(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Open University 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Magnus Ramage
    • 1
  • Karen Shipp
    • 1
  1. 1.The Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations