Advertisement

A Preliminary Study of Two-Handed Manipulation for Spatial Input Tasks in a 3D Modeling Application

  • Antonio Capobianco
  • Manuel Veit
  • Dominique Bechmann
Conference paper

Abstract

We developed a free form deformation application for an immersive environment in which users can interact freely using data gloves. To ensure better comfort and performances, we added the possibility of bimanual interaction in our environment. To investigate the actual gain obtained by this interaction technique, we designed an experimental protocol based on spatial input tasks. In our experiment, we asked our subjects to use only the dominant hand to achieve the different tasks or, on the contrary, to use both hands. Comparison of users’ performances – time and precision – shows that, without proper training, executing a task using two hands can be more time consuming than using one hand. In fact, the degree of symmetry of the tasks performed with each hand seems to have a significant impact on whether users take advantage of bimanual possibilities. Our results also show that bimanual interaction can introduce proprioceptive cues that can be of help to achieve more precision in the placement or selection only when proper visual information are missing.

Keywords

Completion Time Designation Task Dominant Hand Task Completion Time Deformation Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Christou, C., Angus, C., Loscos, C., Dettori, A., Roussou, M.: A versatile large-scale multimodal VR system for cultural heritage visualization. In: M. Slater, Y. Kitamura, A. Tal, A. Amditis, Y. Chrysanthou (eds.) VRST. ACM, New York, pp. 133–140 (2006). URL http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/vrst/vrst2006.html#ChristouALDR06
  2. 2.
    Grossman, T., Balakrishnan, R.: Pointing at trivariate targets in 3D environments. In: CHI’04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp. 447–454 (2004). DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985749
  3. 3.
    Wanger, L.C., Ferwerda, J.A., Greenberg, D.P.: Perceiving spatial relationships in computer-generated images. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 12(3), 44–51; 54–58 (1992). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/38.135913 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boeck, J.D., Weyer, T.D., Raymaekers, C., Coninx, K.: Using the non-dominant hand for selection in 3D. In: 3DUI’06: Proceedings of the 3D User Interfaces, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 53–58, (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Goble, J.C., Kassell, N.F.: A survey of design issues in spatial input. In: UIST’94: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, pp. 213–222 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kunert, A., Kulik, A., Huckauf, A., Fröhlich, B.: A comparison of tracking- and controller-based input for complex bimanual interaction in virtual environment. IPT/EGVE 2007: Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments, Weimar, Germany (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Owen, R., Kurtenbach, G., Fitzmaurice, G., Baudel, T., Buxton, B.: When it gets more difficult, use both hands: exploring bimanual curve manipulation. In: GI’05: Proceedings of Graphics Interface. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, Ontario, pp. 17–24 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wyss, H.P., Blach, R., Bues, M.: iSith – intersection-based spatial interaction for two hands. In: 3DUI’06: Proceedings of the 3D User Interfaces. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, pp. 59–61 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leganchuk, A., Zhai, S., Buxton, W.: Manual and cognitive benefits of two-handed input: An experimental study. ACM Trans. Hum. Comput. Interact.5(4), pp. 326–359 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mine, M.R., Brooks F.P., Sequin, C.H.: Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual environment interaction. In: SIGGRAPH’97: Proceedings of Computer graphics and interactive techniques conference. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, New York, pp. 19–26 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ulinski, A., Zanbaka, C., Wartell, Z., Goolkasian, P., Hodges., L.F.: Two handed selection techniques for volumetric data. In: IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces 2007. Charlotte, North Carolina, March 10–11. pp. 107–114 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guiard, Y.: Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J. Mot. Behav. 9(18), 486–517 (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bagesteiro, L.B., Sarlegna, F.R., Sainburg, R.L.: Differential influence of vision and proprioception on control of movement distance. Exp. Brain Res. 171, 358–370 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buxton, W., Myers, B.: A study in two-handed input. In: CHI’86: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp. 321–326 (1986). DOI http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/22627.22390
  15. 15.
    Huckauf, A., Speed, A., Kunert, A., Hochstrate, J., Fr¨ohlich, B.: Evaluation of 12-dof input devices for navigation and manipulation in virtual environments. In: INTERACT. Springer, Berlin, pp. 601–614 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiyokawa, K., Takemura, H., Katayama, Y., Iwasa, H., Yokoya, N.: Vlego: A simple two-handed modeling environment based on toy block (1997). URL citeseer.ist.psu.edu/kiyokawa97vlego.htmlGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamashita, J., Fukui, Y.: A direct deformation method. In: M. Slater, Y. Kitamura, A. Tal, A. Amditis, Y. Chrysanthou (eds.) Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 1993 IEEE, pp. 499–504 (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shneiderman, B.: Direct manipulation. Designing the User Interface. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1992)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D., Norman, D.A.: Direct manipulation interfaces. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1(4), 311–338 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Llamas, I., Kim, B., Gargus, J., Rossignac, J., Shaw, C.: Twister: A space-warp operator for the two-handed editing of 3D shapes (2003). URL citeseer.ist.psu.edu/llamas03twister.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gribnau, M.: Two-handed interaction in computer supported 3D conceptual modeling, Doctoral thesis, Delft University of Technology (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hinckley, K., Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., Kassell, N.F.: Two-handed virtual manipulation. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 5(3), 260–302 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Capobianco
    • 1
  • Manuel Veit
    • 1
  • Dominique Bechmann
    • 1
  1. 1.LSIIT UMR 7005 CNRS, Pole API Bd Sebastien BrantIllkirch CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations