Translating Museum Visual Contents into Descriptions for Blind Users: A Multidisciplinary Approach

  • Barbara LeporiniEmail author
  • Ivan Norscia
Conference paper


Accessibility and usability guidelines are available to design web sites accessible to blind users. However, the actual usability of accessible web pages varies depending on the type of information the user is dealing with. Museum web sites, including specimens and hall descriptions, need specific requirements to allow vision-impaired users, who navigate using a screen reader, to access pieces of information that are mainly based on visual perception. Here we address a methodology to be applied for the proper creation and elaboration of alternative image descriptions in museum web pages. Such methodology has been applied to a gallery of the Museum of Natural History and Territory (University of Pisa). Such indications allow the user: (1) to address indexed contents and to link to information in more details, (2) to calibrate image descriptions (with a command providing alternative explanations for specimens), and (3) to access extra information for the blind (via hidden labels). A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to obtain effective and comprehensive descriptions. In this perspective, a cooperative environment is eventually proposed for team work facilitation.


Image Description Alternative Description Early Hominid Screen Reader Blind User 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors wish to thank Walter Landini and Elisabetta Palagi (director and curator of the vertebrate section, respectively) of the Museum of Natural History and Territory (University of Pisa): without them this work would not have been possible.


  1. 1.
    Ahn, L., Ginosar, S., Kedia, M., Liu, R., Blum, M. (2006). Improving accessibility of the Web with a computer game. In the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Montréal Québec, Canada, April 22–27, 2006, pp. 79–82Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leporini, B., Paternò, F. (2004). Increasing usability when interacting through screen readers. International Journal Universal Access in the Information Society, 3 (1), 57–70.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leporini, B., Paternò, F. (2008). Applying Web usability criteria for vision-impaired users: does it really improve task performance? International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24 (1), 17–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Petrie, H., Hamilton, F., King, N. (2004). Tension, what tension?: Website accessibility and visual design. In the Proceedings of the 2004 International Cross-disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Vol. 63, pp. 13–18Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petrie, H., King, N., Weisen, M. (2005). The accessibility of museum Web sites: results from an English investigation and international comparisons. In: J. Trant and D. Bearman (eds.). Museums and the Web 2005: Proceedings, Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics, published on March 31, 2005 at">
  6. 6.
    Stephanidis, C., Akoumianakis, D., Sfyrakis, M., Paramythis, A. (1998). Universal accessibility in HCI: process-oriented design guidelines and tool requirements. In: C. Stephanidis and A. Waern (eds.). Proceedings of the 4th ERCIM Workshop on “User Interfaces for All,” Stockholm, Sweden, October 19–21Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Theofanos, M.F., Redish, J. (2003). Bridging the gap: between accessibility and usability. ACM Interactions Magazine, New York: ACM Press, November–December 2003 issue, pp. 36–51Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 URL:
  9. 9.
    Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Draft December 2007–January 2008 URL

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISTI – CNRPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations