Integrating Dialog Modeling and Domain Modeling: The Case of Diamodl and the Eclipse Modeling Framework

  • Hallvard TrættebergEmail author
Conference paper


For most applications, in particular data-intensive ones, dialog modeling makes little sense without a domain model. Since domain models usually are developed and used outside the dialog modeling activity, it is better to integrate dialog modeling languages with existing domain modeling languages and tools, than inventing your own. This chapter describes how the Diamodl language, editor, and runtime have been integrated with the Eclipse Modeling Framework.


Domain Model Unify Modeling Language Class Diagram Eclipse Modeling Framework Prototype Tool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    The Eclipse Modeling Framework home page:
  2. 2.
    Trætteberg, H. Dialog modelling with interactors and UML Statecharts – a hybrid approach. Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems. Funcall, Madeira, June 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trætteberg, H. A Hybrid Tool for User Interface Modelling and Prototyping. In Calvary, G., Pribeanu, C., Santucci, G., Vanderdonckt, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’06. (6–8 June 2006, Bucharest, Romania), Chapter 18, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paternò, F. Model-based Design and Evaluation of Interactive Applications. Series of Applied Computing, Springer-Verlag, London, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mori, G., Paternò, F., Santoro, C. CTTE: Support for Developing and Analyzing Task Models for Interactive System Design, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (August 2002, pp.797–813).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reichart, D. Presented at the Tamodia 2007, Toulouse, France, demo session:
  7. 7.
    Molina, P.J., Meliá, S., Pastor, O. JUST-UI: A User Interface Specification Model. Ch. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’2002, Kolski, J. & Vanderdonckt, J. (eds.), Valenciennes, France. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roberts, D., Berry, D., Isensee, S., and Mullaly, J. Designing for the User with OVID: Bridging User Interface Design and Software Engineering, MacMillan, Indianapolis, 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campos, P., Nunes, N. CanonSketch: A User-Centered Tool for Canonical Abstract Prototyping. Proceedings of the EHCI/DSV-IS’2004, International Conference on Engineering Human-Computer Interaction/International Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems, Hamburg, Germany, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nunes, N. J., Cunha, J. F. WISDOM: Whitewater Interactive System Development with Object Models, in Mark van Harmelen (ed.), Object-oriented User Interface Design, Addison-Wesley, Object Technology Series, 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Limbourg, Q., Vanderdonckt, J. UsiXML: A User Interface Description Language Supporting Multiple Levels of Independence, in Matera, M., Comai, S. (Eds.), Engineering Advanced Web Applications, Rinton Press, Paramus, 2004, pp. 325–338.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    UsiXML language documentation:, last visited at 1. February.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Apache SCXML engine:
  15. 15.
    XSWT: (a bit outdated).
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Object Management Group MetaObject Facility:

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information SciencesNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations