Advertisement

Robotic Urologic Surgery: Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

  • Manish N. Patel
  • Mani Menon
  • Craig G. RogersEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

For renal masses smaller than 4 cm, open partial nephrectomy (OPN) has been the preferred surgical procedure to preserve renal function and minimize the long-term complications associated with renal insufficiency. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has emerged as a viable alternative to OPN with comparable long-term oncologic and functional outcomes, but with the convalescence benefits of a minimally invasive approach. However, LPN is a technically challenging procedure, particularly in regard to intracorporeal sutured renal reconstruction under the time constraints of warm ischemia. Robotic assistance for partial nephrectomy with the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) may facilitate some of the technical challenges of LPN by giving the surgeon three-dimensional stereoscopic vision, a tremor-free platform, and wristed instruments which help recapitulate the open technique.

Keywords

Partial Nephrectomy Warm Ischemia Time Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Renal Hilum Open Partial Nephrectomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, et al. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Porpiglia F, Volpe A, Billia M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. Eur Urol. 2008;53:732.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol. 2008;53:514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Badani KK, Muhletaler F, Fumo M, et al. Optimizing robotic renal surgery: the lateral camera port placement technique and current results. J Endourol. 2008;22:507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R, et al. Da vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2007;51:186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rogers CG, Laungani R, Bhandari A, et al. Maximizing console surgeon independence during robot-assisted renal surgery by using the fourth arm and tileprotrade mark. J Endourol. 2009;23:115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhayani SB, Figenshau RS. The washington university renorrhaphy for robotic partial nephrectomy: a detailed description of the technique displayed at the 2008 world robotic urologic symposium. J Robot Surg. 2008;2:139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178:41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, et al. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol. 2005;173:42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manish N. Patel
    • 1
  • Mani Menon
    • 2
  • Craig G. Rogers
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Robotic Urologic SurgeryVattikuti Urology InstituteDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Columbia University, Menon-Vattikuti Center, New York Presbyterian HospitalNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford HospitalDetroitUSA
  4. 4.Division of Surgical InnovationTechnology and Translation, Sheikh Zayed Institute for Pediatric Surgical Innovation, Children’s National Medical CenterWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations