Skip to main content

Difficulties in Laparoscopic Training, Mentoring, and Medico-Legal Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 728 Accesses

Abstract

Laparoscopy is a surgical technique that requires special knowledge, training, and skills. With the introduction of more complex cases (both extirpative and reconstructive), training is essential to enable the surgeon to do these procedures efficiently. Worldwide spread of laparoscopic urologic surgery has occurred over the years with different efforts by surgeons and their institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kommu SS, Dickinson AJ, Rané A. Optimizing outcomes in laparoscopic urologic training: toward a standardized global consensus. J Endourol. 2007;21(4):378-385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Usón Gargallo J, Sánchez Margallo FM, Díaz-Güemes Martín-Portugués I, Loscertales Martín de Agar B, Soria Gálvez F, Pascual Sánchez-Gijón S. Animal models in urological laparoscopic training. Actas Urol Esp. 2006;30(5):443–450.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Salkini MW, Hamilton AJ. The effect of age on acquiring laparoscopic skills. J Endourol. 2010;24(3):377-379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hollenbeck BK, Roberts WW, Wolf JS. Importance of perioperative processes of care for length of hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery. J Endourol. 2006;20(10):776-781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Touijer K, Guillonneau B. Teaching laparoscopic urologic oncology. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Actas Urol Esp. 2006;30(5):464-468.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McDougall EM, Kolla SB, Santos RT, et al. Preliminary study of virtual reality and model simulation for learning laparoscopic suturing skills. J Urol. 2009;182(3):1018-1025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rassweiler J, Klein J, Teber D, Schulze M, Frede T. Mechanical simulators for training for laparoscopic surgery in urology. J Endourol. 2007;21(3):252-262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones A, Eden C, Sullivan ME. Mutual mentoring in laparoscopic urology - a natural progression from laparoscopic fellowship. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(4):422-425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedican SP, Nakada SY. Videotape mentoring and surgical simulation in laparoscopic courses. J Endourol. 2007;21(3):288-293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marguet CG, Young MD, L’Esperance JO, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic training for postgraduate urologists: the role of mentoring. J Urol. 2004;172(1):286-289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW, Docimo SG, Kavoussi LR. Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 1996;10(2):107-110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee BR, Caddedu JA, Janetschek G, Schulam P, Docimo SG. International surgical telementoring: our initial experience. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998;50:41-47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Micali S, Virgili G, Vannozzi E, et al. Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome (Italy): the first five cases. J Endourol. 2000;14(6):493-496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vilos GA. Laparoscopic bowel injuries: forty litigated gynaecological cases in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24(3):224-230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chisari MG, Finocchiaro A, Lo Menzo E, Rosato V, Basile G. Laparoscopic surgery: from clinic to legal medicine. Minerva Chir. 2004;59(6):589-596.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rougé C, Tuesch JJ, Casa C, Ludes B, Arnaud JP. Patient information and obtaining informed consent in laparoscopic surgery. J Chir (Paris). 1997;134(7–8):340-344.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dagash H, Chowdhury M, Pierro A. When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(5):720-724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roth K, Heeg P, Reichl R. Specific hygiene issues relating to reprocessing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(7):1091-1097.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182(3):1126-1132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed M. Al-Kandari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Al-Kandari, A.M., Gill, I.S. (2011). Difficulties in Laparoscopic Training, Mentoring, and Medico-Legal Issues. In: Al-Kandari, A., Gill, I. (eds) Difficult conditions in laparoscopic urologic surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-105-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-105-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-104-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-105-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics