Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anorectal Physiology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anus

  • 1516 Accesses

Abstract

Disorders of the pelvic floor are common and cause considerable morbidity. It is important to identify which patients need which intervention and as importantly which patients will not benefit from intervention. This in turn depends on accurate clinical and physiological assessment as well as a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach to treatment. The latter is especially important since many of these patients have a global pelvic floor dysfunction which requires a holistic approach to the pelvic floor rather than dividing it into anterior, middle and posterior compartments. This chapter is divided into three sections:

  1. 1.

    Clinical assessment: history and examination

  2. 2.

    Standard physiological measurements

  3. 3.

    Advanced physiological measurements

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stewart WF, Liberman JN, Sandler RS, Woods MS, Stemhagen A, Chee E, et al. Epidemiology of constipation (EPOC) study in the United States: relation of clinical subtypes to sociodemographic features. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(12):3530–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130(5):1480–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lubowski DZ, King DW. Obstructed defecation: current status of pathophysiology and management. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65(2):87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gladman MA, Lunniss PJ, Scott SM, Swash M. Rectal hyposensitivity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(5):1140–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao SS. Dyssynergic defecation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2001;30(1):97–114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Altomare D, Portincasa P, Rinaldi M, Ciaula A, Martinelli E, Amoruso A, et al. Slow-transit constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(2):231–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(6):681–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Varma M, Wang J, Berian J, Patterson T, McCrea G, Hart S. The constipation severity instrument: a validated measure. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(2):162–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA. 1995;274(7):559–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roberts RO, Jacobsen SJ, Reilly WT, Pemberton JH, Lieber MM, Talley NJ. Prevalence of combined fecal and urinary incontinence: a community-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(7):837–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grover M, Busby-Whitehead J, Palmer Rn MH, Heymen S, Palsson OS, Goode PS, et al. Survey of geriatricians on the effect of fecal incontinence on nursing home referral. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(6):1058–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamm MA. Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1994;344(8924):730–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Macarthur C, Glazener C, Lancashire R, Herbison P, Wilson D, Grant A. Faecal incontinence and mode of first and subsequent delivery: a six-year longitudinal study. BJOG. 2005;112(8):1075–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ. 1994;308(6933):887–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):933–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Elfaghi I, Johansson-Ernste B, Rydhstroem H. Rupture of the sphincter ani: the recurrence rate in second delivery. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1361–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Parades V, Etienney I, Thabut D, Beaulieu S, Tawk M, Assemekang B, et al. Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery: myth or reality? A prospective ultrasound study of 93 females. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(1):24–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Hudson CN. Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993;43(3):263–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT. Midline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000;320(7227):86–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson RL, Furner SE, Westercamp M, Farquhar C. Cesarean delivery for the prevention of anal incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(2):CD006756.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McKenna DS, Ester JB, Fischer JR. Elective cesarean delivery for women with a previous anal sphincter rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(5):1251–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A. New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(5):482–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(1):77–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut. 1999;44(1):77–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dobben A, Terra M, Deutekom M, Gerhards M, Bijnen A, Felt-Bersma R, et al. Anal inspection and digital rectal examination compared to anorectal physiology tests and endoanal ultrasonography in evaluating fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;22(7):783–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Vilotte J, Bretagne JF, Heresbach D, Raoul JL, et al. How accurate is clinical examination in diagnosing and quantifying pelvirectal disorders? A prospective study in a group of 50 patients complaining of defecatory difficulties. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(5):430–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tantiphlachiva K, Rao P, Attaluri A, Rao SSC. Digital rectal examination is a useful tool for identifying patients with dyssynergia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(11):955–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Minguez M, Herreros B, Sanchiz V, Hernandez V, Almela P, Anon R, et al. Predictive value of the balloon expulsion test for excluding the diagnosis of pelvic floor dyssynergia in constipation. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(1):57–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bennett RC, Duthie HL. The functional importance of the internal anal sphincter. Br J Surg. 1964;51:355–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Duthie HL, Watts JM. Contribution of the external anal sphincter to the pressure zone in the anal canal. Gut. 1965;6:64–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Frenckner B, Euler CV. Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut. 1975;16(6):482–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Floyd WF, Walls EW. Electromyography of the sphincter ani externus in man. J Physiol. 1953;122(3):599–609.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weber J, Beuret-Blanquart F, Ducrotte P, Touchais JY, Denis P. External anal sphincter function in spinal patients. Electromyographic and manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(5):409–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Rigauts H, Kerremans R. The internal anal sphincter can not close the anal canal completely. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;7(3):159–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Enck P, Eggers E, Koletzko S, Erckenbrecht JF. Spontaneous variation of anal “resting” pressure in healthy humans. Am J Physiol. 1991;261(5 Pt 1):G823–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lubowski DZ, Nicholls RJ, Swash M, Jordan MJ. Neural control of internal anal sphincter function. Br J Surg. 1987;74(8):668–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Parks AG, Fishlock DJ, Cameron JD, May H. Preliminary investigation of the pharmacology of the human internal anal sphincter. Gut. 1969;10(8):674–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Frenckner B, Ihre T. Influence of autonomic nerves on the internal and sphincter in man. Gut. 1976;17(4):306–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Speakman CT, Hoyle CH, Kamm MA, Henry MM, Nicholls RJ, Burnstock G. Neuropeptides in the internal anal sphincter in neurogenic faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993;8(4):201–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jones OM, Brading AF, Mortensen NJ. Role of nitric oxide in anorectal function of normal and neuronal nitric oxide synthase knockout mice: a novel approach to anorectal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(7):963–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rattan S, Culver PJ. Influence of loperamide on the internal anal sphincter in the opossum. Gastroenterology. 1987;93(1):121–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Holdsworth PJ, Sagar PM, Lewis WG, Williamson M, Johnston D. Internal anal sphincter activity after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(1):32–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ. Relationship between anal pressure and anodermal blood flow. The vascular pathogenesis of anal fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(7):664–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lund JN, Scholefield JH. A randomised, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate ointment in treatment of anal fissure. Lancet. 1997;349(9044):11–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McNamara MJ, Percy JP, Fielding IR. A manometric study of anal fissure treated by subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy. Ann Surg. 1990;211(2):235–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bielecki K, Kolodziejczak M. A prospective randomized trial of diltiazem and glyceryltrinitrate ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(3):256–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut. 1977;18(8):656–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation to puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut. 1985;26(5):470–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Faecal incontinence due to external anal sphincter division in childbirth is associated with damage to the innervation of the pelvic floor musculature: a double pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92(8):824–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Marcello P, Barrett R, Coller J, Schoetz D, Roberts P, Murray J, et al. Fatigue rate index as a new measurement of external sphincter function. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(3):336–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Telford KJ, Ali ASM, Lymer K, Hosker GL, Kiff ES, Hill J. Fatigability of the external anal sphincter in anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(5):746–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bannister JJ, Gibbons C, Read NW. Preservation of faecal continence during rises in intra-abdominal pressure: is there a role for the flap valve? Gut. 1987;28(10):1242–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Locke-Edmunds JC, Virjee J, Mortensen NJ. Flap-valve theory of anorectal continence. Br J Surg. 1986;73(12):1012–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lubowski DZ, Meagher AP, Smart RC, Butler SP. Scintigraphic assessment of colonic function during defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(2):91–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Freimanis MG, Wald A, Caruana B, Bauman DH. Evacuation proctography in normal volunteers. Invest Radiol. 1991;26(6):581–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989;30(12):1737–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Greenberg T, Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD. Barium trapping in rectoceles: are we trapped by the wrong definition? Abdom Imaging. 2001;26(6):587–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Maglinte DD, Bartram C. Dynamic imaging of posterior compartment pelvic floor dysfunction by evacuation proctography: techniques, indications, results and limitations. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61(3):454–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Marshall M, Halligan S, Fotheringham T, Bartram C, Nicholls RJ. Predictive value of internal anal sphincter thickness for diagnosis of rectal intussusception in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg. 2002;89(10):1281–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Singh B, Mortensen NJM, Warren BF. Histopathological mimicry in mucosal prolapse. Histopathology. 2007;50(1):97–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE. Anismus in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 1985;30(5):413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Halligan S, Bartram CI, Park HJ, Kamm MA. Proctographic features of anismus. Radiology. 1995;197(3):679–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Jones PN, Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Henry MM. Is paradoxical contraction of puborectalis muscle of functional importance? Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30(9):667–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Seo HI, Park JH, Sohn CI. Is abnormality in the conventional anorectal manometry really abnormal? J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010;16(2):213–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Klauser AG, Voderholzer WA, Heinrich CA, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA. Behavioral modification of colonic function. Can constipation be learned? Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35(10):1271–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Denny-Brown D, Robertson EG. ‘An investigation of the nervous control of defecation’ by Denny-Brown and Robertson: a classic paper revisited. 1935. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6(5):376–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zbar A, Aslam M, Gold D, Gatzen C, Gosling A, Kmiot W. Parameters of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex in patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence and chronic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(2):200–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Whitehead WE, Orr WC, Engel BT, Schuster MM. External anal sphincter response to rectal distention: learned response or reflex. Psychophysiology. 1982;19(1):57–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Duthie HL, Bennett RC. The relation of sensation in the anal canal to the functional anal sphincter: a possible factor in anal continence. Gut. 1963;4(2):179–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Kaur G, Gardiner A, Duthie GS. Rectoanal reflex parameters in incontinence and constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(7):928–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Cervero F, Mortensen NJ. Anorectal sampling: a comparison of normal and incontinent patients. Br J Surg. 1988;75(1):44–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Pryde A, Bartolo DC. Abnormal transient internal sphincter relaxation in idiopathic pruritus ani: physiological evidence from ambulatory monitoring. Br J Surg. 1994;81(4):603–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. O’Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P, Horgan A, Kirwan WO. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35(9):874–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Saigusa N, Belin BM, Choi HJ, Gervaz P, Efron JE, Weiss EG, et al. Recovery of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy: does it correlate with nocturnal continence? Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(2):168–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Schizas AMP, Emmanuel AV, Williams AB. Vector volume manometry – methods and normal values. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;23(9):886–e393.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Perry RE, Blatchford GJ, Christensen MA, Thorson AG, Attwood SEA. Manometric diagnosis of anal sphincter injuries. Am J Surg. 1990;159(1):112–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kahrilas PJ. Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290(5):G1033–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ, Kahrilas PJ. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2009;21(8):796–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Jones MP, Post J, Crowell MD. High-resolution manometry in the evaluation of anorectal disorders: a simultaneous comparison with water-perfused manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(4):850–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Whitehead WE, Delvaux M. Standardization of barostat procedures for testing smooth muscle tone and sensory thresholds in the gastrointestinal tract. The Working Team of Glaxo-Wellcome Research, UK. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42(2):223–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Petersen P, Gao C, Arendt-Nielsen L, Gregersen H, Drewes AM. Pain intensity and biomechanical responses during ramp-controlled distension of the human rectum. Dig Dis Sci. 2003;48(7):1310–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Mortensen NJ. New method for assessment of anal sensation in various anorectal disorders. Br J Surg. 1986;73(4):310–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Bharucha AE, Seide B, Fox JC, Zinsmeister AR. Day-to-day reproducibility of anorectal sensorimotor assessments in healthy subjects. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16(2):241–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE. AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology. 1999;116(3):735–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Rogers J, Laurberg S, Misiewicz JJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal physiology validated: a repeatability study of the motor and sensory tests of anorectal function. Br J Surg. 1989;76(6):607–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Goligher JC, Hughes ES. Sensibility of the rectum and colon. Its role in the mechanism of anal continence. Lancet. 1951;1(6654):543–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Walls EW. Recent observations on the anatomy of the anal canal. Proc R Soc Med. 1959;52(Suppl):85–7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Read MG, Read NW. Role of anorectal sensation in preserving continence. Gut. 1982;23(4):345–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kamm MA, Lennard-Jones JE. Rectal mucosal electrosensory testing – evidence for a rectal sensory neuropathy in idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(5):419–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Baldi F, Ferrarini F, Corinaldesi R, Balestra R, Cassan M, Fenati GP, et al. Function of the internal anal sphincter and rectal sensitivity in idiopathic constipation. Digestion. 1982;24(1):14–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Chan CL, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Rectal hypersensitivity worsens stool frequency, urgency, and lifestyle in patients with urge fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(1):134–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Chan CL, Facer P, Davis JB, Smith GD, Egerton J, Bountra C, et al. Sensory fibres expressing capsaicin receptor TRPV1 in patients with rectal hypersensitivity and faecal urgency. Lancet. 2003;361(9355):385–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Fox M, Thumshirn M, Fried M, Schwizer W. Barostat measurement of rectal compliance and capacity. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(3):360–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Hammer HF, Phillips SF, Camilleri M, Hanson RB. Rectal tone, distensibility, and perception: reproducibility and response to different distensions. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(3 Pt 1):G584–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Sun WM, Read NW, Prior A, Daly JA, Cheah SK, Grundy D. Sensory and motor responses to rectal distension vary according to rate and pattern of balloon inflation. Gastroenterology. 1990;99(4):1008–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Bell AM, Pemberton JH, Hanson RB, Zinsmeister AR. Variations in muscle tone of the human rectum: recordings with an electromechanical barostat. Am J Physiol. 1991;260(1 Pt 1):G17–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Suzuki H, Fujioka M. Rectal pressure and rectal compliance in ulcerative colitis. Jpn J Surg. 1982;12(1):79–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Varma JS, Smith AN, Busuttil A. Correlation of clinical and manometric abnormalities of rectal function following chronic radiation injury. Br J Surg. 1985;72(11):875–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Dall FH, Jorgensen CS, Houe D, Gregersen H, Djurhuus JC. Biomechanical wall properties of the human rectum. A study with impedance planimetry. Gut. 1993;34(11):1581–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Kiff ES, Swash M. Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg. 1984;71(8):614–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GI Physiology Unit, GI Physiology Department, University College London Hospital, London, UK

    Jonathan Gosling MBChB, MRCS & Anton Emmanuel BSc, MD, FRCP, FRCP (Ed)

Authors
  1. Jonathan Gosling MBChB, MRCS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anton Emmanuel BSc, MD, FRCP, FRCP (Ed)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Emmanuel BSc, MD, FRCP, FRCP (Ed) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of GI Surgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom

    Richard Cohen

  2. Department of GI Surgery, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom

    Alastair Windsor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gosling, J., Emmanuel, A. (2014). Anorectal Physiology. In: Cohen, R., Windsor, A. (eds) Anus. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-091-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-091-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-090-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-091-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation