Abstract
Physicians commonly fear being sued in a medical malpractice case. Society expects perfect results from physicians, including urologists who perform endourological procedures. The question is not whether a urologist will be sued but when. In order to understand the rationale behind the risk management best practices discussed in this chapter, the urologist must understand the four legal elements of medical malpractice.
Portions of the risk management advice contained in this chapter have been reprinted with permission from Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company, 2 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016. Copyright © 2010 by Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company. All Rights Reserved. No part of these articles may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, photocopying, or otherwise, without the written permission of MLMIC.
Keywords
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
- Ureteral Calculus
- Medical Malpractice
- Discharge Instruction
- Operating Room Nurse
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
New York Education Law § (Section) 6530 (11) and (25).
- 2.
Gerber GS, Brendler CB. Chapter 3: Evaluation of the Urologic Patient: History, Physical Examination and Urinalysis. 1–9. Wein: Campbell-Walsh Urology (9th ed. 2007). www.mdconsult.com/das/book/body/224870721-3/1076918018/1445/6.html#4-u1.0. Accessed on 11/1/2010.
- 3.
New York Education Law § (Section) 6530 (25-a), Interpretive Guidelines, 42 C.F.R. § (Section) 482.24 (c) (2) (v). www.cms.gov/manuals/downloads/som107ap_a_hospitals.pdf. Accessed on December 13, 2010.
- 4.
Interpretive Guidelines, 42 C.F.R. § (Section) 482.24 (c) (2) (v) www.cms.gov/manuals/downloads/som107ap_a_hospitals.pdf. Accessed on December 13, 2010.
- 5.
Grasso M et al. Percutaneous Endourology: Treatment. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/446934-treatment. Accessed on 10/28/2010. Lingeman J E et al. Current Perspective on Adverse Effects in Shock Wave Lithotripsy. © 2009 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. http://www.auanet.org/content/media/whitepaper.pdf. Accessed on 11/1/2010.
- 6.
New York State Public Health Law § (Section) 2504 (2).
- 7.
United States Code of Federal Regulations, 42 C.F.R. § (Section) 482.13 (b) (3).
- 8.
Novello MD, Antonia C et al. New York State Surgical and Invasive Procedure Protocol for Hospitals, Diagnostic and Treatment Centers, Ambulatory Surgery Centers and Individual Practitioners, New York State Department of Health, Office of Health Systems Management, Division of Primary and Acute Care Services, September 2006. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: 2009 Hospital, Accreditation Standards, pp. 245 – 249.
- 9.
42 C.F.R. § (Section) 489.20(r)(2) and 489.24(j).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richman, D., Robb, J.H. (2013). Avoiding and Overcoming Medicolegal Difficulties in Endourology. In: Al-Kandari, A., Desai, M., Shokeir, A., Shoma, A., Smith, A. (eds) Difficult Cases in Endourology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-083-8_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-083-8_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-082-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-083-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)