Mini-Laparoscopic Systems

Chapter

Abstract

One of the driving forces behind the development of laparoscopy has always been to decrease the morbidity of a laparotomy incision. The evolution from open surgery to laparoscopy was the initial and most dramatic step in this progression. Mini-laparoscopy, whereby the size of each laparoscopic instrument was decreased to the limits of useful instrumentation, was thought to be the next natural evolution in accomplishing this goal. By developing the smallest tools possible to safely and effectively perform surgery, and if each access point creates pain and potential complications, one might limit the trauma inherent to a given operation by miniaturizing each access point.

Keywords

Laparoscopy Minimally invasive LESS Mini-laparoscopy NOTES 

References

  1. 1.
    Dorsey JH, Tabb CR. Mini-laparoscopy and fiber-optic lasers. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1991;18(3):613–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer O, Devroey P, Wisanto A, et al. Small diameter laparoscopy using a microlaparoscope. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(6):1461–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Faber BM, Coddington III CC. Microlaparoscopy: a comparative study of diagnostic accuracy. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(5):952–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thakur V, Schlachta CM, Jayaraman S. Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2011;253:244–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sajid MS, Khan MA, Cheek E, Baig MK. Needlescopic versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review. Can J Surg. 2009;52(2):129–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tu FF, Advincula AP. Miniaturizing the laparoscope: current applications of micro- and minilaparoscopy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;100:94–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soble JJ, Gill IS. Needlescopic urology: incorporating 2-mm instruments in laparoscopic surgery. Urology. 1998;52:187–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J, et al. Nomenclature of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTESTM) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology. J Endourol. 2008;22(11):2575–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M, et al. Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:762–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Micali S, Pini G, Teber D, et al. New trends in minimally invasive urological surgery. What is beyond the robot? World J Urol. 2010. doi:10.1007/s00345-010-0588-5.
  11. 11.
    Canes D, Desai MM, Aron M, et al. Transumbilical single-port surgery: evolution and current status. Eur Urol. 2008;54:1020–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M, et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int. 2008;101:83–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ho C, Yang SS, Tsai Y. Minilaparoscopic high-ligation with the processus vaginalis undissected and left in situ is a safe, effective, and durable treatment for pediatric hydrocele. Urology. 2010;76:134–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gill IS, Ross JH, Sung GT, Kay R. Needlescopic surgery for cryptorchidism: the initial series. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(10):1426–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chung SD, Wu CC, Lin VC, et al. Minilaparoscopic varicocelectomy with preservation of testicular artery and lymphatic vessels by using intracorporeal knot-tying technique: five-year experience. World J Surg. 2011;35(8):1785–90. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1115-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liao CH, Lai MK, Li HY, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy using needlescopic instruments for adrenal tumors less than 5 cm in 112 cases. Eur Urol. 2008;54:640–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsai YC, Wu CC, Ho CH, et al. Minilaparoscopic herniorrhaphy in pediatric inguinal hernia: a durable alternative treatment to standard herniotomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:708–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liao CH, Chueh SC. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for a 6-cm left adrenal pheochromocytoma with needlescopic instruments. J Endourol. 2008;22(9):1949–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tagaya N, Aoki H, Mikami H, et al. The use of needlescopic instruments in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Surg Today. 2001;31:945–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, et al. Needlescopic hysterectomy: incorporation of 3-mm instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2153–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al. Pure natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): transvaginal nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:723–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Branco AW, Filho AJ, Kondo W. Hybrid transvaginal nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;53:1290–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsin DA, Colombero LT, Lambeck J, Manolas P. Minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery. JSLS. 2007;11:24–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Morra I, Scarpa RM. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted minilaparoscopic nephrectomy: a step towards scarless surgery. Eur Urol. 2011;60:862–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Noguera J, Dolz C, Cuadrado A, et al. Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, NOTES, and minilaparoscopy: analysis of a prospective clinical series. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:876–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Irwin BH, Rao PP, Stein RJ, Desai MM. Laparoendoscopic single site surgery in urology. Urol Clin North Am. 2009;36:223–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Park YH, Park JH, Jeong CW, Kim HH. Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site radical nephrectomy with conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal-cell carcinoma. J Endourol. 2010;24(6):997–1003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Andonian S, Herati AS, Atalla MA, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site Pfannenstiel donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2010;75(1):9–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kawauchi A, Kamoi K, Soh J, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site urological surgery: initial experience in Japan. Int J Urol. 2010;17:289–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, et al. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology. 2007;70:1039–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gill IS, Canes D, Aron M, et al. Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008;180:637–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aron M, Canes D, Desai MM, et al. Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2008;103:516–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ganpule AP, Dhawan DR, Kurien A, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a single-center experience. Urology. 2009;74:1238–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Desai MM, Stein R, Rao P, et al. Embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for advanced reconstruction: initial experience. Urology. 2009;73:182–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina R, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients. Urology. 2009;74:805–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Caddedu JA. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1198–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Caddedu JA. Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology. 2009;74:1029–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Raybourn III JH, Rane A, Sundaram CP. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for nephrectomy as a feasible alternative to traditional laparoscopy. Urology. 2010;75:100–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, et al. Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol. 2010;57:95–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lahey Clinic Institute of Urology, Institute of Urology, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Tufts University School of MedicineBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations