Skip to main content

Rectoanal Intussusception, Solitary Rectal Ulcer, and Sigmoidoceles

  • Chapter
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
  • 1693 Accesses

Successful defecation requires the smooth coordination of neurologic and muscular events by the pelvic floor and rectum.Deterioration of a single component of this process may lead to symptomatic rectal dysfunction manifested as constipation from the inability to evacuate. Prolonged untreated dysfunction with straining may ultimately lead to occult or overt rectal prolapse with concomitant rectal ulceration or fecal incontinence. The etiology of rectal dysfunction remains obscure but is believed to be multi-factorial in nature, involving electromyogenic, psychologic, aging, and hormonal mechanisms. In addition, rectal dysfunction is usually one component of a pathophysiologic process that involves the entire pelvic floor. As a result, several clinical manifestations may occur together or separately as part of the spectrum of this disease process and include nonrelaxation of the puborectalis muscle,rectoanal intussusception, rectal prolapse, perineal descent, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), rectocele, sigmoidocele, and hemorrhoids. Consequently, the therapeutic approach to rectal dysfunction is multifactorial, with the primary focus on bowel and pelvic floor retraining, behavioral modifications, and, less frequently, surgical interventions. This chapter will primarily address rectoanal intussusception, solitary rectal ulcer, and sigmoidoceles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001;30(1):199–222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Madoff RD. Rectal prolapse and intussusception. In: Beck DE, Wexner SD, eds. Fundamentals of Anorectal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998:99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Timmcke AE. Functional anorectal disorders. In: Beck DE, Wexner SD,ed.Fundamentals of Anorectal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia:WB Saunders; 1998:91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989;30:1737–1749.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen MB, Buron B, Christiansen J, Hegedus V. Defecographic findings in patients with anal continence and constipation and their relation to rectal emptying. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:806–809.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mellgren A, Schultz I, Johansson C, Dolk A. Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:817–820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vaizey CJ, van den Bogaerde JB, Emmanuel AV, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 1998;85(12): 1617–1623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaizey CJ, Roy AJ, Kamm MA. Prospective evaluation of the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with biofeedback. Gut 1997; 41:817–820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Malouf A, Vaizey C, Kamm M. Results of behavioral treatment (biofeedback) for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44(1):72–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchal F, Bresler L, Brunaud L, et al. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a series of 13 patients operated with a mean follow-up of 4.5 years. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001;16(4):228–233.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sitzler PJ, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, McKee RF. Long-term clinical outcome of surgery for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 1998;85(9):1246–1250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fenner DE. Diagnosis and assessment of sigmoidoceles.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175(6):1438–1442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorge JM,Yang YK, Wexner SD. Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1112–1117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nogueras, J.J., Cera, S.M. (2008). Rectoanal Intussusception, Solitary Rectal Ulcer, and Sigmoidoceles. In: Davila, G.W., Ghoniem, G.M., Wexner, S.D. (eds) Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-348-4_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-348-4_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-347-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-348-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics