Promote Aggregation of SMEs: Suggestions and Actions



The discussion in Chap. 2 presents common characteristics of SME aggregations in different European countries, but also describes some causes of potential crisis. SME clusters and networks essentially are groups of weak industrial bodies – as small enterprises surely appear – which try to enforce their individual weakness by stipulating an agreement for reciprocal help and support. This is the real problem: not only how to define this agreement, but mainly for which actions and common decisions. In developing the CODESNET project, the partners from different European countries have focused a few main critical aspects which should be improved in existing SME networks: on one side, the necessity of a stronger coordination, to be applied either by a central committee or by some commonly accepted consortium management; on the other, the opportunity of having at their disposal efficient tools for improving the performance of clusters and supply chains, as well as the competence of the employed personnel. These critical aspects and proposals to approach them, in terms of new development projects and also of new training and research plans, are analysed in this chapter. The set of contributions has been selected in such a way to give an overview of the new initiatives in different European countries.


Supply Chain Training Network Supply Network Quality Function Deployment Supply Chain Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akao Y (1990) Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Productivity, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand B, Khanna T (2000) Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Manage J 21(3):295–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson et al. (2004) Relationship dynamics: developing business relationships and creating value. In: Mahnke V, Pedersen T (eds) Knowledge flows, governance and the multinational enterprise. Macmillian, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonelli D, Villa A (2007) Network analysis by the CODESNET Approach. In: Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks. Springer, Boston. pp. 67–74, Vol. 243/2007, ISBN: 978-0-387-73797, DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73798-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appley DG, Winder AE (1977) An Evolving Definition of Collaboration and Some Implications for the World of Work. J Appl Behavioral Sci 13(3):279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arda Y, Hennet JC (2006) Inventory control in a multi-supplier system. Int J Prod Econ 104(2):249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arda Y, Hennet JC (2007) Inventory control in a decentralized two-stage make-to-stock queuing system. Special issue on Production Coordination and Inventory Policies. Int J Syst Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Asheim BT, Isaksen A (2002) Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. J Technol Transf 27(1):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Babich V, Ritchken PH, Burnetas AN (2007) Competition and Diversification Effects in Supply Chains with Supplier Default Risk. Manufact Service Oper Manage 9(2):123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barad M, Gien D (2001) Linking improvement models to manufacturing strategies – a methodology for SMEs and other enterprises. Int J Prod Res 39(12):2675–2695zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barley S, Freeman J, Hybels R (1992) Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology. In: Nohria N, Eccles R (eds) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Batt PJ, Purchase S (2004) Managing collaboration within networks and relationships. Indust Market Manage 33(3):169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Becattini G (1990) Industrial district and interfirm cooperation in Italy: the marshallian industrial district and the socio-economic notion. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, pp. 37–51Google Scholar
  14. Bergman EM, Feser EJ (1999) Industrial and Regional Clusters: Concepts and Comparative Applications. Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WVGoogle Scholar
  15. Biswas S, Roy S, Seshagiri S (2007) Collaboration in Indian SME Clusters: A Case Study. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 28–30 June 2007Google Scholar
  16. Bititci US, Martinez V, Albores P, Parung J (2004) Creating and managing value in collaborative networks. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 34(3/4):251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bitran GR, AC Hax (1977) On the Design of Hierarchical Production Planning Systems. Decision Sci 8(1):28–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bossert J (1991) Quality Function Deployment: A Practitioner’s Approach. ASQC Quality, Milwaukee, WIGoogle Scholar
  19. Burt R (1992) Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  20. Cachon GP, Netessine S (2004) Game theory in Supply Chain Analysis. In: Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen ZJ (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the eBusiness Era. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  21. Cachon GP, Zipkin PH (1999) Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Manage Sci 45(7):936–953Google Scholar
  22. Chopra S, Meindl P (2004) Supply Chain Management – Strategy, Planning and Operation, Pearson, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Clancy P, Twomey M (1997) The Irish Popular Music Industry: An Application of Porter’s Cluster Analysis. Research Series Paper No. 2. National Economic and Social Council, DublinGoogle Scholar
  24. Culliton J (1992) A Time for Change: Industrial Policy for the 1990s. Report of the Industrial Policy Review Group. Stationery Office, DublinGoogle Scholar
  25. De Kok AG, Graves SC (eds) (2003) Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operation. Elsevier, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. DeBresson C, Amesse F (1991) Networks of innovators: a review and introduction to the issue. Regional Policy 20(5):363–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Delapierre M, Mytelka L (1998) Blurring boundaries: new inter-firm relationships and the emergence of networked, knowledge-based oligopolies. In: Colombo MG (ed) The Changing Boundaries of the Firm: Explaining evolving inter-firm relations. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Department of Enterprise and Employment (1997) Human Resource Development, White Paper. 1997. Ireland Government Publications, DublinGoogle Scholar
  29. EMult (2005) European Multi-threaded Dynamic SME Networks for Market-Driven ELV Recycling. Contract EC-IST- 27212/, Annex I. Description of Work. PIAP, Warsaw, pp. 1–101. Accessed 2008Google Scholar
  30. Ferguson NS (2002) An information system for end of life product recovery. Dissertation, CIMRU, National University of Ireland, GalwayGoogle Scholar
  31. Gadde LE, Huemer L, Hakansson H (2003) Strategizing in industrial networks. Indust Market Manage 32(5):357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gavirneni S, Kapuscinski R, Tayur S (1999) Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Manage Sci 45(1):16–24Google Scholar
  33. GFP (2005) Enabling SMEs to enter the International supply chain. The World Bank Group, GFP Exploratory Notes, June 2005. Accessed 2008Google Scholar
  34. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The Voice of the Customer. Market Sci 12:1–27Google Scholar
  36. Guide DV (2000) Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. J Oper Manage 18(4):467–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gulati R, Nohria N, Zaheer A (2000) Strategic Networks. Strategic Manage J 21(3):203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haidegger G, Kovács Gy (2003) On general issues of Technology Transfer in Hungary. In: Kovács Gy, Haidegger G (eds) EW-ISME Success Stories Seminar 20 Oct 2003. MTA SZTAKI, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  39. Haidegger G, Kovács Gy, Bámer B (2003) Recycling Technology Implementation by the Integration of SME Operations. In: Tóth T, Bikfalvi P, Göndri Nagy J (eds) WESIC 2003, Advanced Technologies in Manufacturing 28–30 May, University of Miskolc, Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on European Scientific and Industrial Collaboration vol I, pp. 611–615Google Scholar
  40. Hakansson H (1990) Technological collaboration in industrial networks. Eng Manage 8(3):371–379Google Scholar
  41. Hakansson H, Ford D (2002) How should companies interact in business networks. J Bus Res 55(2):133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hardy C, Phillips N (1998) Strategies of engagement: lessons from the critical examination of collaboration and conflict in an interorganizational domain. Organ Sci 9(2):217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harland CM, Lamming RC, Zheng J, Johnsen TE (2001) A taxonomy of Supply Networks. J Supply Chain Manage (Fall 2001):21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Himmelman AT (1992) Communities Working Collaboratively for a Change. The Himmelman Consulting Group, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  45. Huxham C (1996) Collaboration and collaborative advantage. In: Huxham C (ed) Creating Collaborative Advantage. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  46. Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H (2000) Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Manage J 21(3):217–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kanter RM (1994) Collaborative advantage: the art of alliances. Harvard Bus Rev 72(4):16–108Google Scholar
  48. King R (1995) Designing Products and Services that Customer Wants. Productivity, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  49. Knights D, Murray F, Willmott H (1993) Networking as knowledge work: a study of strategic interorganizational development in the financial services industry. J Manage Studies 30(6):975–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kovács GL, Haidegger G (eds) (2001) Business Growth through European Partnerships, Conference for SME-s. Proceedings of the EU IPS-2001-42012 EW ISME project’s Final Conference. MTA SZTAKI, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  51. Krupansky J (2004) Agtivity: State of the Art for Software Agent Technology. http://agtivity. com. Accessed 2008Google Scholar
  52. Lariviere MA, Porteus EL (2001) Selling to the newsvendor: an analysis of price-only contracts. Manuf Service Oper Manage 3(4):293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lewis DJ (1990) Partnership for Profit: Structuring and Maintaining Strategic Alliances. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Lincoln JR, Gerlach ML, Takahashi P (1992) Keiretsu networks in the Japanese economy: a dyad analysis of intercorporate ties. Am Sociol Rev 57(5):561–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Martin R, Sunley P (2003) Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concepts or policy panacea? J Econ Geogr 3(1):5–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Myhr N, Spekman RE (2005) Collaborative supply-chain partnerships built upon trust and electronically mediated exchange. J Bus Indust Market 20(4–5):179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nix N, Zacharia ZG, Lusch RF, Bridges WR, Thomas A (2004) Keys to Effective Supply Chain Collaboration: A Special Report from the Collaborative Practices Research Program. The M. J. Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, Fort WorthGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Connell L, Van Egeraat C, Enright P (1997) The Irish Dairy Processing Industry: An Application of Porter’s Cluster Analysis, Research Series Paper No. 1. National Economic and Social Council, DublinGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Gorman C, O’Malley E, Mooney J (1997) The Irish Indigenous Software Industry: An Application of Porter’s Cluster Analysis, Research Series Paper No. 3. National Economic and Social Council, DublinGoogle Scholar
  60. Osborne MJ, Rubinstein A (1994) A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  61. Pander S, Wagner R (2005) Unternehmensübergreifende Zusammenarbeit in der Automobilentwicklung – durch erfahrungsgeleitete Kooperation die Grenzen der Planbarkeit überwinden. Hampp, MeringGoogle Scholar
  62. Phillips N, Lawrence TB, Hardy C (2000) Interorganizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. J Manage Studies 37(1):23–45Google Scholar
  63. Porter ME (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Pouly M, Monnier F, Bertschi D (2005) Success and Failure Factors of Collaborative Networks of SME. In: Camarinha-Matos LM, Afsarmanesh H (eds) Collaborative Networks and Their Breeding Environments, vol 186. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin Sci Q 41(1):116–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Radhakrishnan S, Srinidhi B (2005) Sharing Demand Information in a Value Chain: Implication for Pricing and Profitability. Rev Quant Finance Account 24(1):23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ringle CM (2004) Kooperation in virtuellen Unternehmungen – Auswirkungen auf die strategischen Erfolgsfaktoren der Partnerunternehmen. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  68. Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D (2000) Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Manage J 21(3):369–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sabel CF (1996) A measure of federalism: assessing manufacturing technology centers. Regional Policy 25(2):281–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Science Technology and Innovation Advisory Council (1995) Making Knowledge Work For Us. Stationary Office, DublinGoogle Scholar
  71. Shapiro J (2001) Modeling the Supply Chain. Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CAGoogle Scholar
  72. Shoham Y (1993) Agent-oriented Programming. Artif Intell 60:51–92CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  73. Simchi-Levi D, Kaminsky P, Simchi-Levi E (2000) Designing and managing SC. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  74. Skillnets (2006) The Skillnets Company Satisfaction Survey 2006. resources/publications.html. Accessed 20 Dec 2007Google Scholar
  75. Slack N (1994) The importance performance matrix as a determinant of improvement priority. Int J Oper Product Manage 14(5):59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Subramaniam V (1998) Efficient sourcing and debt financing in imperfect product markets. Manage Sci 44(9):1167–1178zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. Sucky E (2007) A model for dynamic strategic vendor selection. Comput Oper Res 34:3638–3651zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tayur S, Ganeshan R, Magazine M (eds) (1999) Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  79. Terk E, Haidegger G et al. (2005) Enterprises in technology-intensive business. Toolkit for coping with international environment and developing management competences. Module 2: East-West cooperation. Estonian Institute for Futures Studies, Tallinn, pp. 26–39Google Scholar
  80. Tomkins C (2001) Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks. Account Organ Soc 26(2):161–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Brussel H, Wyns J, Valckenaers P, Bongaerts L, Peeters P (1998) Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Comput Indust 37:255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Villa A, Bellomo D, Cassarono I (2005) Uncertain demand and supply network management: application to a regional health care service. In: 16th IFAC World Congress, PragueGoogle Scholar
  83. Villa A, Cassarino I (2005) CODESNET: an approach to modelling COllaborative Demand and Supply NETwork. In: Collaborative Networks and their Breeding Environments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Von Hippel E (1988) Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Wasserman S, Galaskiewicz J (1994) Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Science. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  86. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  87. Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia (2008) Graph theory. theory. Accessed 2008Google Scholar
  88. Winand U (ed), Klaus N (1998) Unternehmensnetzwerke und virtuelle Organisation. Schäffer-Poeschel, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  89. Wood DJ, Gray B (1991) Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration. J Appl Behav Sci 27(2):139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zeller C (2002) Project teams as means of restructuring and development in the pharmaceutical industry. Regional Studies 36(3):275–289CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2009

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations