Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applying a User-centered Approach to Interactive Visualisation Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trends in Interactive Visualization

Part of the book series: Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing ((AI&KP))

Abstract

Analysing users in their context of work and finding out how and why they use different information resources is essential to provide interactive visualisation systems that match their goals and needs. Designers should actively involve the intended users throughout the whole process. This chapter presents a user-centered approach for the design of interactive visualisation systems. We describe three phases of the iterative visualisation design process: the early envisioning phase, the global specification phase, and the detailed specification phase. The whole design cycle is repeated until some criterion of success is reached. We discuss different techniques for the analysis of users, their tasks and domain. Subsequently, the design of prototypes and evaluation methods in visualisation practice are presented. Finally, we discuss the practical challenges in design and evaluation of collaborative visualisation environments. Our own case studies and those of others are used throughout the whole chapter to illustrate various approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. K. Allendörfer, S. Aluker, G. Panjwani, J. Proctor, D. Sturtz, M. Vukovic, and C. Chen. Adapting the cognitive walkthrough method to assess the usability of a knowledge domain visualisation. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualisation (InfoVis’05) , 2005. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Amar, and J. Stasko. A knowledge task-based framework for design and evaluation of information visualisations. In M. Ward and T. Munzer, editors, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualisation (InfoVis’04), volume 04, 143–149, Austin, TX, USA, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnstein, L. Hung, C.-Y. Franza, R. Zhou, Q. H. Borriello, G. Consolvo, and S. Su. J. 2002.Labscape: A smart environment for the cell biology laboratory. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1:(3)13–21,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bardram, C. Bossen, A. Lykke-Olesen, R. Nielsen, and K. H. Madsen. Virtual video prototyping of pervasive healthcare systems. In W. Mackay and J. A. W. Gaver, editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’02), 167–177, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Benyon, P. Turner, and S. Turner. Designing Interactive Systems: People, Edinburgh, 2005. Addison Wesley, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Berry, J. Smith, and S. Wahid. Visualizing case studies. Computer Science TR-04- 12, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg VA, 2004. Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beyer. H. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems, Morgan Kaufmann.San Francisco, USA,

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Card and J. Mackinlay. The structure of the information visualisation design space. In J. Dill and N. Gershon, editors, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualisation (InfoVis’97), 92–100, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 1997. IEEE Computer Society Press

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Carroll, editor. Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development, 1995. John Wiley and Sons, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll and J. M. Carrithers. C. 1984.Training wheels in a user interface. Communication of the ACM, 27:(8)800–806,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen and C. Yu. Y. 2000.Empirical studies of information visualisation: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53:(5)851–866,

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chenna, R. Sugawara, H. Koike, T. Lopez, R. Gibson, T. Higgins, and D. Thompson. J. 2003.Multiple sequence alignment with the clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 31:(13)3497–3500,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clamp, M. Cuff, J. Searle, and S. M. Barton. G. J. 2004.The jalview java alignment editor. Bioinformatics, 20:(3)426–427,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Consolvo, L. Arnstein, and B. Franza. User study techniques in the design and evaluation of a ubicomp environment. In G. Borriello and L. E. Holmquist, editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 73–90, GGöteborgteborg, Sweden, 2002. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cooper. A. The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How To Restore The Sanity, volume 1, Sams, Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.Indianapolis, IN, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. C. der Veer, M. van Welie, and C. Chisalita. Introduction to groupware task analysis. In C. Pribeanu and J. Vanderdonckt, editors, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design (TAMODIA’02), 32–39, Bucharest, Romania, 2002. INFOREC Publishing House Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Dietz, R. Raskar, S. Booth, J. V. Baar, K. Wittenburg, and B. Knep. Multiprojectors and implicit interaction in persuasive public displays. In Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI’04), 209–217, 2004. ACM Press, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. F. Dumas and J. C. Redish. A Practical Guide to Usability Testing, 1993. Greenwood Publishing Group Inc, Westport CT.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dunbar. K. 1995. The Nature of Insight, chapter How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories, The MIT Press.Cambridge, MA, 365–395,

    Google Scholar 

  20. O. Espinosa, C. Hendrickson, and J. Garrett. Domain analysis: A technique to design a user-centered visualisation framework. In D. Keim and G. Wills, editors, INFOVIS’99: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualisation, 44–52, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Fallman. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In G. Cockton and P. Korhonen, editors, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 225–232, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 2003. ACM Press. New York NY

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Fekete, G. Greinstein, and C. Plaisant. Infovis contest, 2004. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/iv04contest Retrieved 14–12–2007.

  23. J. Fekete and C. Plaisant. Information visualisation benchmark repository, 2004.http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/InfovisRepository/ Retrieved 14–12–2007.

  24. Figueroa, P. Bischof, W. F. Boulanger, and P. James Hoover. H. 2005.Efficient comparison of platform alternatives in interactive virtual reality applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62:73–103,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Fikkert, M. D’Ambros, T. Bierz, and T. Jankun-Kelly. Interacting with visualisations. In A. Kerren, A. Ebert, and J. Meyer, editors, Human-Centered Visualisation Environments, volume 4417 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter 3, 77–162. London, 2007. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fuchs. Beyond the desktop metaphor: Toward more effective display, interaction, and telecollaboration in the office of the future via a multitude of sensors and displays. In S. Nishio and F. Kishino, editors, AMCP’98: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advanced Multimedia Content Processing, 30–43, London, UK, 1999. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Graham, M. Kennedy, and J. Benyon. D. 2000.Towards a methodology for developing visualisations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53:789–807,

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Grudin and J. Pruitt. Personas, participatory design, and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In T. Binder, J. Gregory, and I. Wagner, editors, Participatory Design Conference 2002, 144–161, Malmo, Sweden, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. G. Hendry. Sketching with conceptual metaphors to explain computational processes. In J. Grundy and J. Howse, editors, Proceedings of the Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC’06), 95–102, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Holman, R. Vertegaal, M. Altosaar, N. Troje, and D. Johns. Paper windows: Interaction techniques for digital paper. In W. Kellogg and S. Zhai, editors, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05), 591–599, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2005. ACM Press New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. House, V. Interrante, D. Laidlaw, R. Taylor, and C. Ware. Panel: Design and evaluation in visualisation research. In IEEE Visualisation Conference, 705–708, Minneapolis, United States, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Iqbal, J. Sturm, O. Kulyk, J. Wang, and J. Terken. User-centred design and evaluation of ubiquitous services. In International Conference on Design of Communication: Documenting and Designing for Pervasive Information, 138–145, Coventry, United Kingdom, 2005. ACM Press, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  33. ISO-13407. Human-Centered Design Processes for Interactive Systems. Technical report, ISO, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Javahery, H. Seffah, and A. Radhakrishnan. T. 2004.Beyond power: Making bioinformatics tools user-centered. Communications of the ACM, 47:(11)58–63,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J. Kelley. An empirical methodology for writing user-friendly natural language computer applications. In A. Janda, editor, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’83), 193–196, New York, NY, USA, 1983. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. Kobsa. An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualisation systems. In A. Jacobs, editor, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualisation 2001 (INFOVIS’01), 123–130, Washington, DC, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Koua and M. Kraak. A usability framework for the design and evaluation of an exploratory geovisualisation environment. In E. Banissi, K. Borner, C. Chen, M. Dastbaz, G. Clapworthy, A. Failoa, E. Izquierdo, C. Maple, J. Roberts, C. Moore, A. Ursyn, and J. Zhang, editors, Eighth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV’04), volume 00, 153–158, Parma, Italy, 2004. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Kujala and M. Kauppinen. Identifying and selecting users for user-centered design. In R. Raisamo, editor, NordiCHI: Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, volume 82, 297–303, Tampere, Finland, 2004. ACM Press, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  39. O. Kulyk, R. Kosara, J. Urquiza-Fuentes, and I. Wassink. Human-Centered Visualisation Environments, volume 4417 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, chapter Human-Centered Aspects, 13–75, Human-centered aspects, 2007. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  40. O. Kulyk, E. van Dijk, P. van der Vet, and A. Nijholt. Do you know what I know? Situational awareness and scientific team-work in collaborative environments. In A. Nijholt, O. Stock, and T. Nishida, editors, Social Intelligence Design 2007. Proceed-ings Sixth Workshop on Social Intelligence Design, volume WP07–02 of CTIT Workshop Proceedings Series, 207–215, London, UK, 2007. Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enshede, the Netherlands. ISSN 15 74–0846.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kulyk, O. Wang, and C. Terken. J. 2006. Real-time feedback based on nonverbal behaviour to enhance social dynamics in small group meetings. In Renals and S. Bengio, editors, S. editors, Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction, volume 3869 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 150–161, Edinburgh, UK, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  42. O. Kulyk and I. Wassink. 2006. Getting to know bioinformaticians: Results of an exploratory user study. In E. Zudilova-Seinstra and T. Adriaansen, editors, HCI 2006 Engage, Combining Visualisation and Interaction to Facilitate Scientific Exploration and Discovery, London, UK, 30–37,

    Google Scholar 

  43. Landay and J. A. Myers. B. A. 2001.Sketching interfaces: Toward more human interface design. IEEE Computer, 34:(3)56–64,

    Google Scholar 

  44. Latour and B. Woolgar. S. 1979. Laboratory Life, Sage publications.Beverly Hills, CA,

    Google Scholar 

  45. S. Lauesen. User Interface Design, 2005. Addison Wesley, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  46. MacEachren, A. Gahegan, M. Pike, W. Brewer, I. Cai, G. Lengerich, and E. Hardisty. F. 2004.Geovisualisation for knowledge construction and decision support. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24:13–17,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. W. E. Mackay. Ethics, lies and videotape. In SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, 138–145, Denver, Colorado, United States , 1995 . ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  48. Morgan. D. 1997. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, Sage.London,

    Google Scholar 

  49. B. A. Nardi and J. R. Miller. An ethnographic study of distributed problem solving in spreadsheet development. In F. Halasz, editor, Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported cooperative work (CSCW’90), 197–208, New York, NY, USA, 1990. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. D. Neale, J. Carroll, and M. Rosson. Evaluating computer-supported cooperative work: Models and frameworks. In ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’04), 112–121, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2004. ACM Press, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nielsen. J. 1994. Usability Engineering, Morgan Kaufmann.San Francisco,

    Google Scholar 

  52. J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack. 1994. Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  53. North and C. Shneiderman. B. 2000. Snap-together visualisation: Can users construct and operate coordinated visualisations? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53:715–741,

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Novick and D. G. Scholtz. J. C. 2002.Universal usability. Interacting with Computers, 14:(4)269–270,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pevzner. P. A. 2004.Educating biologists in the 21st century: Bioinformatics scientists vs bioinformatics technicians. Bioinformatics, 20:(14)2159–2161,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. C. Plaisant. The challenge of information visualisation evaluation. In Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 109’116, Gallipoli, Italy, 2004. ACM Press, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  57. C. Plaue, T. Miller, and J. Stasko. Is a picture worth a thousand words?: An evaluation of information awareness displays. In Conference on Graphics Interface, 117’126, Ontario, Canada, 2004. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society.

    Google Scholar 

  58. M. Polanyi. 1983. The Tacit Dimension, Paul Smith Publishing, Gloucester MA.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Poppe, R. Rienks, and R. van Dijk. E. 2007. Evaluating the future of hci: Challenges for the evaluation of emerging applications. In Huang, T. Nijholt, A. Pantic, and M. Pentland, editors, A. Artificial Intelligence for Human Computing, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 234–250, ISBN=3–540–72346–2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Preece, J. Rogers, and Y. Sharp. H. 2002. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, John Wiley and Sons Ltd.New York,

    Google Scholar 

  61. R. Pressman and D. Ince. 2000. Software Engineering, volume 5, McGraw-Hill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  62. M. Ramage. 1999. The Learning Way: Evaluation of Cooperative Systems. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rauwerda, H. Roos, M. Hertzberger, and B. Breit. T. 2006.The promise of a virtual lab in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today, 11:(5–6)228–236,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rettig. M. 1994.Prototyping for tiny fingers. Communications of the ACM, 37:(4)21–27,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. P. Saraiya, C. North, and K. Duca. An evaluation of microarray visualisation tools for biological insight. In M. Ward and T. Munzer, editors, Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualisation (INFOVIS’04), 1–8,Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society Press

    Google Scholar 

  66. Seo and J. Shneiderman. B. 2002.Interactively exploring hierarchical clustering results. Computer, 35:(7)80–86,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. H. Sharp, Y. Rogers, and J. Preece. 2007. Interaction Design, volume 2, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  68. B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualisations. In R. S. Sipple, editor, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, 336–343, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Shneiderman. B. 2000.Universal usability. Communications of ACM, 43:(5)84–91,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant. 2005. Designing the User Interface, Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.

    Google Scholar 

  71. C. Snyder. 2003. Paper Prototyping: The Fast and Easy Way to Design and Refine User Interfaces, Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  72. R. Spence. Information Visualisation, Edinburgh Gate, 2001. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA.

    Google Scholar 

  73. B. Stolk, F. Abdoelrahman, A. Koning, P. Wielinga, J. Neefs, A. Stubbs, A. de Bondt, P. Leemans, and P. van der Spek. Mining the human genome using virtual reality. In Eurographics Workshop on Parallel Graphics and Visualisation, 17–21, 2002. Germany Eurographics Digital Library.

    Google Scholar 

  74. D. Stone, C. Jarrett, M. Woodroffe, and S. Minocha. 2005. User Interface Design and Evaluation: Series in Interactive Technologies, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  75. A. Sutcliffe. Advises project: Scenario-based requirements analysis for e-science applications. In S. J. Cox, editor, UK e-Science All Hands Meeting 2007, 142–149, Nottingham, UK, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Sutcliffe, A. Ennis, and M. Watkinson. S. 2000.Empirical studies of end-user information searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51:(13)1211–1231,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Thompson, J. D. Plewniak, and F. Poch. O. 1999.A comprehensive comparison of multiple sequence alignment programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 27:(13)2682–2690,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. B. Tognazzini. The starfire video prototype project: A case history. In B. Adelson, S. Dumais, and J. Olson, editors, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 99–105, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tory and M. Möller. T. 2005.Evaluating visualisations: Do expert reviews work? IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25:8–11,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Trafton, G. J. Kirschenbaum, S. S. Tsui, T. L. Miyamoto, R. T. Ballas, and J. A. Raymond. P. D. 2000.Turning pictures into numbers: Extracting and generating information from complex visualisations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53:827–850,

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. van der Lelie. C. 2006.The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10:(2–3)159–162,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. G. van der Veer and M. van Welie. Task based groupware design: Putting theory into practice. In D. Boyarski and W. A. Kellogg, editors, Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’00), 326–337, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  83. P. van der Vet, O. Kulyk, I. Wassink, F. Fikkert, H. Rauwerda, E. van Dijk, G. van der Veer, T. Breit, and A. Nijholt. Smart environments for collaborative design, implementation, and interpretation of scientific experiments. In T. Huang, A. Nijholt, M. Pantic, and A. Pentland, editors, Workshop on AI for Human Computing (AI4HC), 79–86, Hyderabad, India, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  84. M. van Welie, G. van der Veer, and A. Koster. Integrated representations for task modeling. In P. Wright, E. Hollnagel, and S. Dekker, editors, Tenth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 129–138, Link¨oping, Sweden, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  85. D. Vyas, S. Groot, and G. der Veer. Understanding the academic environments: From field study to design. In G. Grote, editor, 13th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Switzerland, 119–120, New York, September 2006. ACM Press, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ware, C. Christopher, and D. Hollands. J. 2004. Information Visualisation: Perception for Design, volume 2, Morgan Kaufmann.San Fransisco, CA, USA,

    Google Scholar 

  87. Westerman and S. Cribbin. T. 2000.Mapping semantic information in virtual space: Dimensions, variance and individual differences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53:765–787,

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. S. Wilson, M. Bekker, P. Johnson, and H. Johnson. Helping and hindering user involvement – a tale of everyday design. In S. Pemberton, editor, CHI’97: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 178–185, New York, NY, USA, 1997. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  89. M. A. Winckler, P. Palanque, and C. M. Freitas. Tasks and scenario-based evaluation of information visualisation techniques. In 3rd annual conference on Task models and diagrams, 165–172, Prague, Czech Republic, 2004. ACM Press, New York NY.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wood. L. E. 1997. Semi-structured interviewing for user-centered design. Interactions, 4:(2)48–61,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhang. J. 1996.A representational analysis of relational information displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45:(1)159–74,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. J. Zhang, K. Johnson, J. Malin, and J. Smith. Human-centered information visualisation. In R. Ploetzner, editor, International Workshop on Dynamic Visualisations and Learning, Tübingen, 2002. Digital Enterprise Research Institute, University of Inns-bruck.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was part of the BioRange Programme of the Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre (NBIC), which is supported by a BSIK grant through the Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI).

Authors
  1. Ingo Wassink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olga Kulyk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Betsy van Dijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerrit van der Veer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paul van der Vet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

    About this chapter

    Cite this chapter

    Wassink, I., Kulyk, O., Dijk, B., Veer, G., Vet, P. (2009). Applying a User-centered Approach to Interactive Visualisation Design . In: Liere, R., Adriaansen, T., Zudilova-Seinstra, E. (eds) Trends in Interactive Visualization. Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-269-2_8

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-269-2_8

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Springer, London

    • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-268-5

    • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-269-2

    • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics

    Search

    Navigation