A Service-oriented Reference Architecture for Organizing Cross-Company Collaboration

  • Christoph Schroth


Today, cross-company collaboration is about to gain significant momentum, but still shows weaknesses with respect to productivity, flexibility and quality: Point-to-point, Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)-based approaches or Managed File Transfer installations provide only limited functional richness and low reach as they often represent proprietary island solutions. A new generation of providers of software (Multienterprise/ Business-to- Business (B2B) Gateway solutions) and services (Integration-as-a-Service and B2B Project Outsourcing) for multienterprise interaction is about to emerge today and allows for richer interaction while reducing the costs for electronic transactions heavily. However, these products and services still exhibit weaknesses with respect to both managerial and technological aspects. In this work, we present and thoroughly discuss a service-oriented reference architecture for business media that overcome the drawbacks of today’s B2B software products and services. Based on the IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description (IEEE 1471-2000) in combination with Schmid’s Media Reference Model, this reference architecture provides four main views: community (structural organization), process (process-oriented organization), services and infrastructure.


Support for cross-enterprise co-operative Work Service oriented Architectures for interoperability Interoperable enterprise architecture Architectures and platforms for interoperability Interoperable inter-enterprise workflow systems 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    McAfee, A. (2004). Will Web Services Really Transform Collaboration. Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 78–84.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Malone, T. (2001). The Future of E-Business. Sloan Management Review, 43(1), 104.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Porter, M. (2001). Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Business Review, 79(3), 63–78.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Schroth, C. (2007). Web 2.0 and SOA: Converging Concepts Enabling Seamless Cross Organizational Collaboration. Proceedings of the IEEE Joint Conference CEC’07 and EEE’ 07, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Frenzel, P., Schroth, C., Samsonova, T. (2007). The Enterprise Interoperability Center-An Institutional Framework Facilitating Enterprise Interoperability. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems, St. Gallen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lheureux, B. J., Malinverno, P. (2006). Magic Quadrant for Integration Service Providers, 1Q06. USA: Gartner Research Paper.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    White, A., Wilson, D., Lheureux, B. J. (2007). The Emergence of the Multienterprise Business Process Platform. USA: Gartner Research Paper.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lheureux, B. J., Biscotti, F., Malinverno, P., White, A., Kenney, L. F. (2007). Taxonomy and Definitons for the Multienterprise/B2B Infrastructure Market. USA: Gartner Research Paper.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lheureux, B. J., Malinverno, P. (2007). Spider Diagram Ratings Highlight Strengths and Challenges of Vendors in the B2B Infrastructure Market. USA: Gartner Research Paper.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    IEEE Computer Society (2000). IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description; IEEE Std. 1471-2000.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Greunz, M. (2003). An Architecture Framework for Service-Oriented Business Media. Dissertation, University of St. Gallen. Bamberg, Germany: Difo-Druck.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Schmid, B. F., Lechner, U., Klose, M., Schubert, P. (1999). Ein Referenzmodell für Gemeinschaften und Medien. in: M. Englien (Hrsg.), J. Homann (Hrsg.): Virtuelle Organisation und neue Medien. Lohmar: Eul Verlag-Workshop GeNeMe 99, Gemeinschaften in neuen Medien.-Dresden.-ISBN 3-89012-710-X, 125–150.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Schmid, B. F. Elektronische Märkte-Merkmale, Organisation und Potentiale, available online at:, accessed in 2007.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Schmid, B. F., Schroth, C. (2008). Organizing as Programming: A Reference Model for Cross-Organizational Collaboration. Proceedings of the 9th IBIMA Conference on Information Management in Modern Organizations, Marrakech, Morocco.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Parnas, D. L. (1972). On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules, Communications of the ACM, 15(12), 1053–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Schroth, C., Pemptroad, G., Janner, T. (2007). CCTS-based Business Information Modelling for Increasing Cross-Organizational Interoperability. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications, Madeira, Potugal.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    HERA project, available online at:, accessed in 2007.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Müller, W. (2007). Event Bus Schweiz. Konzept und Architektur, Version 1.5, Eidgenössiches Finanzdepartement (EFD), Informatikstrategieorgan Bund (ISB).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Schroth
    • 1
  1. 1.MCM Institute and SAP Research CECUniversity of St. GallenSt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations