Enterprise Architecture: A Service Interoperability Analysis Framework

  • J. Ullberg
  • R. Lagerström
  • P. Johnson


Enterprise architecture is a model-based approach to IT management used for promotion of good IT decision making. Thus, an enterprise architecture framework needs to support various forms of analysis. Creation of enterprise architecture models is costly and without intrinsic value, therefore it is desirable to create models that effectively support the sought after analysis. This paper presents an extended influence diagram describing theory of enterprise service interoperability. The theory is augmented with a metamodel containing the information needed to perform analysis of interoperability. A fictional example is provided to illustrate the employment of the metamodel and the theory in the context of IT decision making.


Measuring validating and verifying interoperability Enterprise modeling for interoperability Modelling methods tools and frameworks for (networked) enterprises Formal approaches and formal models of interoperability Enterprise applications analysis and semantic elicitation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Johnson, P., et al.: Enterprise Architecture Analysis with Extended Influence Diagrams. In: Information System Frontiers, vol 9(2), Springer, The Netherlands (2007)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Shachter, R.: Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Research, 34(6) pp 871–882, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, Hanover Maryland (1986)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Howard, R.A., Matheson, J.E.: Influence Diagrams. Decision Analysis Vol. 2(3), pp. 127–143, Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, Hanover Maryland (2005)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Neapolitan, R.: Learning Bayesian Networks. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Jensen, F.V.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Springer New York, Secaucus, NJ, USA (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Johnson, P., Lagerström, R., Närman, P.: Extended Influence Diagram Generation. In: Enterprise Interoperability II — New Challenges and Approaches, pp. 599–602, Springer, London (2007)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Shachter, R.: Probabilistic inference and influence diagrams. Operations Research, 36(4), pp 36–40 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Johnson, P., Ekstedt, M.: Enterprise Architecture — Models and Analyses for Information System Decision Making. Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden (2007)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lagerström, R.: Analyzing System Maintainability Using Enterprise Architecture Models. In: Proceedings of the 2 nd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR’07), pp. 31–39, St Gallen, Switzerland (2007)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture: A Field Guide to Integrating XML and Web Services. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2004)Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology, and Design. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2005)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Marks, E., Bell, M.: Service-Oriented Architecture: A Planning and Implementing Guide for Business and Technology. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (2006)Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kasunic, M., Anderson, W.: Measuring Systems Interoperability: Challenges and Opportunities. Technical Note, CMU/SEI-2004-TN-003, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh (2004)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Linthicum, D.: Enterprise Application Integration. Addison-Wesley, New Jersey (2000)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    IEEE: Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology. Std 610.12-1990. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Saeed, J.: Semantics. Second Edition, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK (2003)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Papazoglou, M., Georgakopoulos, D.: Service-Oriented Computing. In: Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46 No. 10 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Gottschalk, K., Graham, S., Kreger, H., Snell, J.: Introduction to Web services architecture. In: IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 41 No. 2 (2002)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Zachman, J.A.: A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, IBM, vol 26(3), pp 454–470 (1987)Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group: DoD Architecture Framework, version 1.0. Department of Defense, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    The Open Group: The Open Group Architecture Framework, version 8 Enterprise Edition. Reading U.K. (2005), Scholar
  22. [22]
    Office of Management and Budget: FEA Consolidated Reference Model Document Version 2.1. OMB, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    IFAC-IFIP: Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration Geram: Generalized enterprise reference architecture and methodology, version 1.6. (1999)Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Scheer, A.W.: Business Process Engineering — Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises 2nd Edition. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany (1994)Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Troux Technologies: Metis Architect — Datasheet. (2007)Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Papazoglou, M.: Service-Oriented Computing: Concepts, Characteristics and Directions. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE’03), IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Närman, P., Johnson, P., Nordström, L.: Enterprise Architecture: A Framework Supporting System Quality Analysis. Will appear in: Proceedings of the 11 th International IEEE EDOC Conference, Annapolis, USA (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Ullberg
    • 1
  • R. Lagerström
    • 1
  • P. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Information & Control SystemsKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations