Advertisement

Proposal for an Object Oriented Process Modeling Language

  • Reiner Anderl
  • Jens Malzacher
  • Jochen Raßler

Abstract

Processes are very important for the success within many business fields. They define the proper application of methods, technologies and company structures in order to reach business goals. Not only manufacturing processes have to be defined from the start point to their end, also other processes like product development processes need a proper description to gain success. For example in automotive industries complex product development processes are necessary and defined prior to product development. Over the last decades several product modeling languages have been developed moving to object oriented modeling languages, such as UML, but the used process modeling languages are still procedural. The paradigm shift caused by object oriented description within product modeling languages has to be transferred to process modeling languages. This paper introduces an object oriented approach for process modeling. Using UML as a starting point an object oriented process modeling method is differentiated. The basic concepts which are needed for process modeling are put into an object oriented context and are explained. The paper also deals with the most important methods behind object oriented process modeling and gives an outlook, what can be achieved by this approach.

Keywords

process modeling object orientation UML modeling language 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    IEEE Std 1320.1-1998. IEEE Standard for Functional Modeling Language—Syntax and Semantics for IDEF0. New York: IEEE, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bernius, P.; Mertins, K.; Schmidt, G. (Eds): Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, 2nd Edition. Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS — Business Process Frameworks, 2nd Edition, Berlin, 1998Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS — Business Process Modeling, 2nd Edition, Berlin, 1999Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    OMG: Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure v2.1.1, of Feb 2007, www.omg.org, 2007Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Eriksson, H.-E.; Penker, M.: Business modeling with UML: business patterns at work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Burkhardt, R.: UML — Unified Modeling Language: Objektorientierte Modellierung für die Praxis. Addison-Wesley-Longman, Bonn (1997)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    OMG: Business Process Modeling Notation Specification, of Feb 2006, www.omg.org, 2006Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Spur, G.; Mertins, K.; Jochem, R.; Warnecke, H.J.: Integrierte Unternehmensmodellierung Beuth Verlag GmbH (1993)Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    International Standards Organization (ISO): ISO 18629 Series: Process Specification Language of 2004, www.iso.org, 2004Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Luh, W.: Mathematik für Naturwissenschaftler, Bd.1, Differentialrechnung und Integralrechnung, Folgen und Reihen, Aula, Wiesbaden (1987)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Clausert, H., Wiesemann, G.: Grundgebiete der Elektrotechnik 2. Wechselströme, Leitungen, Anwendungen der Laplace-und Z-Transformation, Oldenbourg, München (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reiner Anderl
    • 1
  • Jens Malzacher
    • 1
  • Jochen Raßler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Integrated Design (DiK)Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadt

Personalised recommendations