Engineer to Order Supply Chain Improvement Based on the GRAI Meta-model for Interoperability: An Empirical Study

  • A. Errasti
  • R. Poler


Companies compete in saturated markets trying to be more productive and more efficient. In this context, to manage the entire supply network to optimize overall performance becomes critical. Enterprise Modelling of Decision Systems is an important instrument to structure this complexity. This paper explores the methodology in which the redesign of internal and external operational integrated processes should be done, applying the GRAI Meta Model and the Design Principles for Interoperability, in order to improve the overall performance of an Engineer to Order Supply Chain. This research has also conducted a case study in the Producer Goods Sector from an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) point of view. The main conclusions related to the aim of the paper are that, the reengineered system integrates the Supply Chain Network more effectively, as well as achieving the customers’ objectives in terms of time and cost.


Business Process Reengineering in interoperable scenarios Enterprise modelling for interoperability Modelling cross-enterprise business processes Experiments and case studies in interoperability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Acur N, Biticci U, (2000) Active assessment of strategy performance. Proceedings of the IFP WG 5.7, International Conference on Production Management, Tromso, Norway.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bittitci US, Martinez V, Albores P, Parung J, (2004) Creating and managing value in collaborative network. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management Vol. 34, No.3/4, pp.251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Browne J, Sackett PJ, Wortmann JC, (1995) Future Manufacturing Systems-towards the extended enterprise. Computers in Industry, Vol.25, pp.235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Caron F, Fiore A, (1995) Engineer to order companies: how to integrate manufacturing and innovative processes. International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 13, No.5.pp.313–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Coughlan, P., Coughlan D. (2002) “Action Research: Action research for operations management”.International Journal of Operations and Production Management Vol 22 No 2 pp. 220–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Dassisti M, Chen D, Scorziello F, (2006) GRAI and SCOR Meta-model and Design Principles for Interoperability. I-ESA’06 Conference, Bordeaux, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Doumeingts G, Vallespir B, Chen D, (1998) GRAI Grid Decisional Modelling. In Handbook on Architecture of Information Systems, Edited by P. Bernus, K. Mertins, G. Schmith, Springer Verlag, pp. 313–337.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Errasti A, Oyarbide A, Santos J, Case Research to gain competitive advantage through construction process reeingineering. Faim2005, 15thInternational Conference on Flexible Automation & Intelligent Manufacturing.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Errasti A, Poler R, Oyarbide A, Santos J, (2006) Supply chain improvement based on GRAI Method: an empirical study. Proceedings of 13th Euroma International Conference, Glasgow, Great Britain.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Fawcett S, Magnan G, (2002) The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol.32, No 5, pp.339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Feurer R, Chaharbaghi K, Wargin J. (1995) Analysis of strategy formulation and implementation at Hewlet Packard. Management Decision, Vol.33, No.10, pp.4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Gunn TG (1987) Manufacturing for Competitive Advantage: Becoming a World Class Manufacturer. Ballinger Publishing Company, Boston M.A.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001) The Strategy Focused Organization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Massachussets.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Lummus R, Vovurka R, (1999) Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems No.99/1, pp.11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Martinez, V. & Bititci, U.(2006) Aligning value propositions in supply chains. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 1, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Marucheck A, Pannesi R, Anderson C, (1990) An exploratory study of the manufacturing strategy in practice. Journal of Operations Management, Vol.9, No.1, pp.101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Platts KW (1990) Manufacturing audit in the process of strategy formulation. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Poler R, Lario FC, Doumeingts G, (2002) Dynamic Model of Decision Systems (DMDS). Computers in Industry, Vol.49, pp.175–193.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Porter ME, (1980) Competitive Strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ramsay, J. (2005) The real meaning of value in trading relationships. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Salvador F, Rungtusanatham M, Forza C, Trentin A, (2005) Understanding synergies and trade-offs between volume flexibility and mix flexibility in Build-to-Order strategies. Proceedings of 12th Euroma International Conference, Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Slack N, Chambers S, Johnston R, (2004) Operations Management. 4th ed., Pearson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Thomas S, (2002) Contractors risk in Design, Novate and Construct contracts”. International Journal of Project Management. 20 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Voss, C. Nikos Tsikriktsis and Mark Frohlich. (2002) “Case Research in operations management”.2002.International Journal of Operations and Production Management Vol 22 No 2 pp.195–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Errasti
    • 1
  • R. Poler
    • 2
  1. 1.Supply Chain Consulting, SCCUlma Handling SystemsSpain
  2. 2.Research Centre on Production Management and EngineeringPolytechnic University of ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations