Advertisement

Adopting Service Oriented Architectures Made Simple

  • L. Bastida
  • A. Berreteaga
  • I. Cañadas

Abstract

Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) is envisioned as providing major benefits related to business, such as: increasing efficient cost and complexity management; enabling organisational evolution and interoperability; or increasing competitiveness. But, will the adoption of SOA benefit your organisation? Before adopting SOA, organisations must understand not only what it is, how it can benefit them and what their motivations to adopt SOA are, but also the organisational challenges required to undertake this transition as well as the changes required to manage the entire Service based systems lifecycle. The adoption of SOA has to be carefully understood from the organisational and technological perspectives. In this paper we analyse the organisational and technological challenges an organisation adopting SOA faces and propose a set of best practices that will enable an organisation to efficiently adopt SOA.

Keywords

Service oriented Architectures for interoperability Intelligent infrastructure and automated methods for business system integration Modelling methods tools and frameworks for (networked) enterprises 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    IST-SeCSE project, VI Framework Programme (2004–2008). http://secse.eng.itGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    SODA ITEA Project, 2006–2008. http://www.soda-itea.orgGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    IST-AMIGO project, VI Framework Programme (2004–2008). http://www.hitechprojects.com/euprojects/amigo/Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Sonic, Systinet, AmberPoint, BearingPoint: A New SOA Maturity Model, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Andrew Pugsley: SOA Domain Model & HP SOA Maturity Model, HP, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    David Groves: Successfully Planning for SOA: Building Your SOA Roadmap, BEA, 2005, http://dev2dev.bea.com/pub/a/2005/12/soa-roadmap.htmlGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Ali Arsanjani: Increase flexibility with the Service Integration Maturity Model (SIMM), IBM, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Software Engineering Institute: CMMI® A-Specification v1.6, February 2004.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Software Engineering Institute: CMMI for Services: Initial Draft, September 2006Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), www.w3.orgGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Organisation for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS), www.oasis-open.orgGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Web services Interoperability (WS-I), www.ws-i.orgGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    InfoWorld Research Report, SOA, 2005–2006Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Booby Woolf: Composite Services, April 2006 ww-03.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/woolf?entry=composite_servicesGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Bastida
    • 1
  • A. Berreteaga
    • 1
  • I. Cañadas
    • 1
  1. 1.European Software InstituteZamudio, BizkaiaSpain

Personalised recommendations