Advertisement

Heterogeneous Domains’ e-Business Transactions Interoperability with the use of Generic Process Models

  • Sotirios Koussouris
  • George Gionis
  • Aikaterini Maria Sourouni
  • Dimitrios Askounis
  • Kostas Kalaboukas

Abstract

Interoperability is the key factor which will drive e-Business to the next level by offering fully automated transactions among Enterprise Applications, such as Enterprise Resource Planning or Supply Chain Management systems. Nowadays, research seems to have dealt with the problem of interoperability in various business domains, however the issue of interoperability in heterogeneous business domains — Enterprises, Governmental and Banking Institutions of different countries (cross-border) or Enterprises of different interests (cross-sector) - remains still a big challenge. This paper presents generic models of the most common business transactions carried out mainly by Small and Medium Enterprises. These models are constructed using state-of-the art notations and methodologies which facilitate the Application-to-Application interconnection and the automated business documents exchange between enterprises, governmental and banking institutions, covering not only national or sector specific business domain transactions but also cross-border and cross-sector processes, which imply different requirements as apart from the differences in the execution way, different legal rules and data entities, are also present.

Keywords

Modeling cross-enterprise business processes Enterprise modeling for interoperability Meta-data and meta-models for interoperability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Androutsellis-Theotokis S, Karakoidas V, Gousios G, Spinellis D, Charalabidis Y, (2005) Building an e-Business Platform: An Experience Report. e-Challenges 2005 Conference, European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary, (1990), A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer GlossariesGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Charalabidis Y, Gionis G, Askounis D, Koussouris S, (2006) Enterprise Application Interoperability via Internet Integration for SME’s, Governmental Organisations and Intermediaries in the New European Union. eChallenges 2006 ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Charalabidis Y, Karakoidas V, Theotokis S, Spinelis D, (2004) Enabling B2B Transactions over the Internet through Application Interconnection. eAdoption and the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies, IOS Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    The INTEROP Network of Excellence: http://www.interop-noe.org.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    The ATHENA project website: http://www.athena-ip.orgGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Research Project FUSION, Business process fusion based on Semantically-enabled Service-oriented Business Applications http://www.fusionweb.org/fusionGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    En-Vision, A New Vision for the participation of European SMEs in the future e-Business scenario, http://www.e-nvision.orgGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Genesis IST Project: http://www.genesis-ist.euGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Sixth Framework Programme: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp6/Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    GENESIS Annex I — “Description of Work”, Version 7.0, (December 2005)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Bussler C, (2001) B2B Protocol standards and their role in semantic B2B integration engines. Bull Tech Comm Data Eng 24(1):3–11Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Athena Project Deliverable-A1.1.2 Second Version of State of the Art in Enterprise Modelling Techniques and Technologies to Support Enterprise InteroperabilityGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    IDEAS Project Deliverable: D11_PartA Enterprise Modeling State-of-the-ArtGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Dayal U, Hsu M, Ladin R, (2001) Business process coordination: state of the art, trends, and open issues. In: VLDB Conference, pp 3–11Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Business Process Modeling Notation: http://www.bpmn.orgGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Business Process Execution Language (BPEL): http://www.oasis-open.orgGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    UBL 2.0: http://docs.oasis-open.org/ubl/prd-UBL-2.0/Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    eEUROPE 2005: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2005/index_en.htmGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    IDABC: http://europa.eu.int/idabc/Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    OFX, available online at, http://www.ofx.net/Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Nikolaidou M, Anagnostopoulos D, Tsalgatidou, A, (2001) Business process Modelling and Automation in the Banking Sector: A case study. IJSSST, Special Issue on “Business Process Modelling”, vol 22, p.65–76Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sotirios Koussouris
    • 1
  • George Gionis
    • 1
  • Aikaterini Maria Sourouni
    • 1
  • Dimitrios Askounis
    • 1
  • Kostas Kalaboukas
    • 2
  1. 1.National Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.SingularLogic SoftwareN. IoniaGreece

Personalised recommendations