Skip to main content

Enabling Simulation – Simulation and Process Improvement Methodology

  • Chapter
Enabling a Simulation Capability in the Organisation

Part of the book series: Decision Engineering ((DECENGIN))

  • 559 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates how a process-centred change methodology can be used as a framework for undertaking a simulation study and simulation can be seen as an important technique when undertaking process improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aguilar, M.; Rautert, T.; Pater, A. (1999), Business Process Simulation: A fundamental step supporting process centred management, Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. by Farrington PA, Nembhard HB, Sturrock DT, Evans GW, SCS, 1383–1392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P.C.; Anderson, C.K.; Staples, D.S.; Elder, M. (1999), Decision-makers’ perceptions of the value and impact of visual interactive modelling, Omega, 27: 2, 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D. (1998), Representing process: the contribution of a reengineering frame, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18: 12, 1163–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. and Kleiner, B.H. (1997), New developments in re-engineering organizations, Work Study, 46: 3, 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. and Bal, J. (1998), Process analysis techniques and tools for business improvements, Business Process Management Journal, 4: 4, 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotoia, M. and Johnson, S. (2001), Applying the axiomatic approach to business process redesign, Business Process Management Journal, 7: 4, 304–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T.J. and Rolfes, J.D. (1998), Selecting BPR projects based on strategic objectives, Business Process Management Journal, 4: 2, 114–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, P. (1998), Marketing Management and Strategy, 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathee, M.M.; Redd, R.; Gorgas, D.; Modarres, B. (1998), The Effects of Complexity on Business Process Reengineering: Values and Limitations of Modeling and Simulation Techniques, Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. by Mederios DF, Watson EF, Carson JS, Manivannan MS, SCS, 1339–1345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaglis, G.M. (1999), On the Integrated Design and Evaluation of Business Processes and Information Systems, Communications of the AIS, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaglis, G.M.; Mylonopoulos, N.; Doukidis, G.I. (1999), The ISSUE methodology for quantifying benefits from information systems, Logistics Information Management, 2, 50–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greasley, A. (2001), Costing Police Custody Operations, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 24: 2, 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greasley, A. and Barlow, S. (1998), Using simulation modelling for BPR: resource allocation in a police custody process, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18: 9/10, 978–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulledge, T.R. and Sommer, R.A. (2002), Business process management: public sector implications, Business Process Management Journal, 8, 364–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, H.J. (1991), Business Process Improvement, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, H.J. and Tumay, K. (2000), Simulation Modeling Methods: To reduce risks and increase performance, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. (1998), Investigating business processes: does process simplification always work?, Business Process Management Journal, 4: 2, 137–153.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, H.; McHugh, P.; Pendlebury, J.; Wheeler, W. (1993), Business Process Re-engineering: Break Point Strategies for Market Dominance, John Wiley & Sons, Chicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelton, W.D., Sadowski, R.P., Sadowski, D.A. (1998), Simulation with Arena, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelton, W.D.; Sadowski, R.P.; Sadowski, D.A. (2001), Simulation with ARENA, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettinger, W.; Teng, J.; Guha, S. (1997), Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques and tools, MIS Quarterly, March, 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1994), Re-engineering methodologies and tools: a prescription for enhancing success, Information Systems Management, Spring, 30-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levas, A.; Boyd, S.; Jain, P.; Tulskie, W.A. (1995), Panel discussion on the role of modelling and simulation in business process reengineering, Proceedings of the 1995 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. by C. Alexopoulos, K. Kang, W.R. Lilegdon and D. Goldsman, SCS, 1341–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, L.O. and Aurand, S.S. (1994), Evaluating Automated Work-Flow Systems for Administrative Processes, Interfaces, 24, 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majed, A. and Zairi, M. (2000), Revisiting BPR: a holistic review of practice and development, Business Process Management Journal, 6: 1, 10–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martilla, J.A. and James, J.C. (1977), Importance-Performance Analysis, Journal of Marketing, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, R. and Bailie, B. (2002), Business performance measures and alignment impact on strategy: The role of business improvement models, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 22: 9, 972–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A.; Gregory, M.; Platts, K. (1995), Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15: 4, 80–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, M.K.; Fernandes, R.; Padmanaban, N.; Mayer, R.J. (1996), A methodology for integrating business process and infrastructure models, Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. by Charnes JM, Morrice DJ, Brunner DT, Swain JJ, SCS, 1305–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppard, J. and Rowland, P. (1995), The Essence of Business Process Re-engineering, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrozzo, D.P. and Stepper, J.C. (1994), Successful Reengineering, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidd, M. (1998), Computer Simulation in Management Science, 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Profozich, D. (1998), Managing Change with Business Process Simulation, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, J. (2000), Implementing and integrating crime mapping into a police intelligence environment, International Journal of Police Science and Management, 2, 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (1994a), Successful Simulation: A Practical Approach to Simulation Projects, McGraw-Hill, Berkshire.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (1994b), Simulation projects: building the right conceptual model, Industrial Engineering, September, 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. (2001), Soft with a hard centre: discrete-event simulation in facilitation, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52, 905–915.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, M. (2000), Police chiefs crack down on shirkers, The Sunday Times, February 27, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack, N. and Lewis, M. (2002), Operations Strategy, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumay, K. (1996), Business Process Simulation, Proceedings of the 1996 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. by Charnes JM, Morrice DJ, Brunner DT, Swain JJ, SCS, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, R.; Gibbs, G.D.; Gilgan, R.J. (2000), Redesigning check-processing operations using animated computer simulation, Business Process Management Journal, 6, 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J.R. and Crosslin, R.L. (1995), Simulation Modeling for BPR, Information Systems Management, 12, 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R.B. and Keyser, T.K. (1998), Discrete event simulation experiments and geographic information systems in congestion management planning, Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. by Mederios DF, Watson EF, Carson JS, Manivannan MS, SCS, 1087–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B. and Wright, D.T. (1997), Software tools supporting business process analysis and modelling, Business Process Management Journal, 3: 2, 133–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Enabling Simulation – Simulation and Process Improvement Methodology. In: Enabling a Simulation Capability in the Organisation. Decision Engineering. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-169-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-169-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-168-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-169-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics