Skip to main content

Outcomes and Standards for Hip Resurfacing

  • Chapter
Modern Hip Resurfacing

Abstract

Only in the past decade has the routine use of outcome instruments been introduced into orthopedic practice. Early arthroplasty literature was dominated by actuarial survival analysis and the outcome instruments of Harris [1] and Charnley [2] hip scores. These latter two traditional approaches to outcome required both signs and symptoms to be measured, thus when regular follow-up was required, these instruments imposed a large burden on clinical and hence financial resources. The emphasis has now moved to the design of patient self-reporting questionnaires, which are much more practical to implement. This is a reasonable approach as a patient presents with symptoms and the “healing physician” is expected to relieve these symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. W H Harris. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation in acetabular fractures: treatment by mould arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 51:737–755, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J Charnley. Long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 54:61–76, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Joint Registry Centre. 2nd Annual Report — September 2005. Annual report, National Joint Registry for England and Wales, 2006. Available at www.njrcentre.org.uk.

  4. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2007. Available at http://www.R-project.org.

  5. A C August, C H Aldam, and P B Pynsent. The McKee-Far-rar hip arthroplasty. A long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 68:520–527, 1986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J Daniel, P B Pynsent, and D McMinn. Survival analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in young patients with osteo-arthiritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86:177–184, 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J M Bland. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T M Therneau and P M Grambsch. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Available at http://www.searo.who.int/en/section898/section1441.htm.

  10. J E Ware. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide. Nimrod Press, The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 2nd edition, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E C Nelson, J H Wasson, D J Johnson, and R D Hays. Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts: Brief measures for clinical practice. Available at http://www.dartmouth.edu/coop-proj/index.html.

  12. J M Landgraf and E C Nelson. Summary of the WONCA/COOP International Health Assessment Field Trial. the Dartmouth COOP Primary Care Network. Aust Fam Physician, 21:255–7, 260–2, 266–9, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C van Weel. Functional status in primary care: COOP/WONCA charts. Disabil Rehabil, 15:96–101, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J Dawson, R Fitzpatrick, A Carr, and D Murray. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 78:185–90, 1996.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. P B Pynsent. Choosing an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83:792–794, 2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. P B Pynsent, D J Adams, and S P Disney. The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87:241–248, 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J Dawson, R Fitzpatrick, D Murray, and A Carr. The problem of ‘noise’ in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement. Journal of Health Services & Research Policy, 1:224–31, 1996.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. A S Bryk and S W Raudenbush. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J Daniel, H Ziaee, C Pradhan, P B Pynsent, and D J W McMinn. Blood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: Four-year results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89:169–73.

    Google Scholar 

  21. H C Amstutz, B J Thomas, R Jinnah, W Kim, T Grogan, and C Yale. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 66:228–41, 1984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S B Detmar, M J Muller, J H Schornagel, L D V Wever, and N K Aaronson. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288:3027–3034, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. M L Essink-Bot, P F Krabbe, G J Bonsel, and N K Aaronson. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. the Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care, 35:522–537, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. D Bruusgaard, I Nessiy, O Rutle, K Furuseth, and B Natvig. Measuring functional status in a population survey. The Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts/WONCA used in an epidemiological study. Fam Pract, 10:212–218, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McBryde, C.W., Pynsent, P.B. (2009). Outcomes and Standards for Hip Resurfacing. In: McMinn, D.J.W. (eds) Modern Hip Resurfacing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-088-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-088-9_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-087-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-088-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics