Abstract
Only in the past decade has the routine use of outcome instruments been introduced into orthopedic practice. Early arthroplasty literature was dominated by actuarial survival analysis and the outcome instruments of Harris [1] and Charnley [2] hip scores. These latter two traditional approaches to outcome required both signs and symptoms to be measured, thus when regular follow-up was required, these instruments imposed a large burden on clinical and hence financial resources. The emphasis has now moved to the design of patient self-reporting questionnaires, which are much more practical to implement. This is a reasonable approach as a patient presents with symptoms and the “healing physician” is expected to relieve these symptoms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
W H Harris. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation in acetabular fractures: treatment by mould arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 51:737–755, 1969.
J Charnley. Long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 54:61–76, 1972.
National Joint Registry Centre. 2nd Annual Report — September 2005. Annual report, National Joint Registry for England and Wales, 2006. Available at www.njrcentre.org.uk.
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2007. Available at http://www.R-project.org.
A C August, C H Aldam, and P B Pynsent. The McKee-Far-rar hip arthroplasty. A long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 68:520–527, 1986.
J Daniel, P B Pynsent, and D McMinn. Survival analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in young patients with osteo-arthiritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86:177–184, 2004.
J M Bland. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. Oxford University Press, 3rd edition, 2000.
T M Therneau and P M Grambsch. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, 2000.
World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Available at http://www.searo.who.int/en/section898/section1441.htm.
J E Ware. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide. Nimrod Press, The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, 2nd edition, 1997.
E C Nelson, J H Wasson, D J Johnson, and R D Hays. Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts: Brief measures for clinical practice. Available at http://www.dartmouth.edu/coop-proj/index.html.
J M Landgraf and E C Nelson. Summary of the WONCA/COOP International Health Assessment Field Trial. the Dartmouth COOP Primary Care Network. Aust Fam Physician, 21:255–7, 260–2, 266–9, 1992.
C van Weel. Functional status in primary care: COOP/WONCA charts. Disabil Rehabil, 15:96–101, 1993.
World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1986.
J Dawson, R Fitzpatrick, A Carr, and D Murray. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 78:185–90, 1996.
P B Pynsent. Choosing an outcome measure. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83:792–794, 2001.
P B Pynsent, D J Adams, and S P Disney. The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87:241–248, 2005.
J Dawson, R Fitzpatrick, D Murray, and A Carr. The problem of ‘noise’ in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement. Journal of Health Services & Research Policy, 1:224–31, 1996.
A S Bryk and S W Raudenbush. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1992.
J Daniel, H Ziaee, C Pradhan, P B Pynsent, and D J W McMinn. Blood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: Four-year results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89:169–73.
H C Amstutz, B J Thomas, R Jinnah, W Kim, T Grogan, and C Yale. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 66:228–41, 1984.
S B Detmar, M J Muller, J H Schornagel, L D V Wever, and N K Aaronson. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288:3027–3034, 2002.
M L Essink-Bot, P F Krabbe, G J Bonsel, and N K Aaronson. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. the Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care, 35:522–537, 1997.
D Bruusgaard, I Nessiy, O Rutle, K Furuseth, and B Natvig. Measuring functional status in a population survey. The Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment charts/WONCA used in an epidemiological study. Fam Pract, 10:212–218, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McBryde, C.W., Pynsent, P.B. (2009). Outcomes and Standards for Hip Resurfacing. In: McMinn, D.J.W. (eds) Modern Hip Resurfacing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-088-9_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-088-9_26
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-087-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-088-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)