Skip to main content

Remarks on the Complexity of Cooperative Work (2002)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cooperative Work and Coordinative Practices

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

Cooperative work, as an aspect of human ecology, seems to have existed in human societies for hundreds of thousands of years, but until recently only as a marginal phenomenon. Work has, of course, been socially situated and socially organized in all human societies, and ‘cooperation’ as the sharing of the fruits of our toil is arguably constitutive of human sociality (Reynolds, 1981).

Kjeld Schmidt: ‘Remarks on the complexity of cooperative work,’ Revue des sciences et technologies de l’information. Série Revue d’intelligence artificielle (RSTI-RAI), vol. 16, no. 4–5, Hermes/Lavoisier, Paris, 2002, pp. 443–483.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bittner’s analysis of the observer’s perspective is a development of Schutz’ analysis of ‘common-sense’ and scientific perspectives (Schütz, 1953).

  2. 2.

    For identical observations about the complexity of hospital work, cf. (Strauss et al., 1985).

  3. 3.

    One may object that the phenomenon of selective attention has been subjected to extensive research since 1976. However, in an extensive review of the literature on this issue from 1986 Johnston and Dark wonder whether ‘understanding the nature of selective attention is ultimately futile’ (Johnston and Dark, 1986, p. 70). Again, in a sweeping review of the literature from 1993 Allport questions whether attention is a coherent field of study and whether any theoretical progress has been made in 25 years of research (Allport, 1993).

  4. 4.

    George Miller is quite explicit about this (Miller, 1953, 1956).

  5. 5.

    Notice how diligently Miller makes ‘the number of bits of information’ the measure of ‘familiarity’ and ‘learning’.

  6. 6.

    Wood’s distinctions hark back to Thompson’s (1967).

  7. 7.

    The more intense the interdependencies of activities are, the larger the space of possible states the actor will need to take into account before taking action, especially with respect to the state of the field of work of colleagues, etc.

  8. 8.

    The terms ‘mobilization’ and ‘deployment’ are here used as the neutral terms to denote the processes of (a) identifying potential actors and (b) specifying the relationship between actors and activities, irrespective of the particular social form of these processes. Mobilization may thus involve conscription as well as volunteering. Likewise, ‘deployment’ may mean somebody’s assigning somebody else to a particular task as well as somebody’s assuming a particular task. The point is that the styles and forms of mobilization and deployment vary immensely. When deploying, actors may be commanded to do something, they may be specifically paid to do it, they may be expected to do it, they may believe they might be expected to do it, they may do it because they believe it may be in their interest to do it, they may offer to do it as a helpful gesture, they may do it because it’s fun, and so on. Very often all of these styles and forms of governance coexist and complement each other in an infinitely variegated pattern.

  9. 9.

    Cf. Leigh Star’s concept of ‘boundary objects’ (Star and Griesemer, 1989; Star, 1989).

  10. 10.

    It is worth noticing that the two usages of the term ‘articulation work’ are reflected in the literature. On one hand, Anselm Strauss consistently uses the term ‘articulation work’ in the sense of ‘first order’ articulation work. To him the ‘granularity’ of the concept is defined by the concept of ‘tasks’ and articulation work is simply same as the ‘articulation of tasks’ as he also puts it (Strauss, 1985). By contrast, Gerson and Star do not treat ‘task’ as a black box; they open up the box and generalize the concept of articulation work to denote the ongoing adjustment of action in view of inexorable contingencies: the concretization, instantiation, adaptation, modification, etc. of routines, plans, and representations (Gerson and Star, 1986).—In my usage of the term ‘articulation work’ I am following Gerson and Star.

  11. 11.

    It should be emphasized, however, that actors observe and understand the bodily conduct of colleagues, not simply on the basis of some putatively generic and innate semantic scheme of postures and gestures, but with respect to and in terms of the actor’s knowledge of the state of the field of work. I am stressing this because the role of bodily conduct in cooperative work is often idealized and overstated. An actor’s observation of the bodily conduct of a co-worker may or may not be critical in a particular setting or situation but it is always grounded in the observer’s understanding of the structural and behavioral characteristics of the common field of work, its current state, as well as the operational constraints and procedures and is thus an integrated aspect of their domain-specific professional competences.

References

  • Allport, Alan: ‘Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years’, in D. E. Meyer and S. Kornblum (eds.): Attention and Performance XIV: Synergies in Experimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993, pp. 183–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbage, Charles: On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures, Charles Knight, London, 1832. (4th ed., 1835). – Augustus M. Kelley, Publishers, Fairfield, NJ, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, Chester I.: The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, Ludwig von: General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications, Braziller, New York, NY, 1968. – Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Egon: ‘Objectivity and realism in sociology’, in G. Psathas (ed.): Phenomenological Sociology: Issues and Applications, Wiley, New York, NY, etc., 1973, pp. 109–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre: The Logic of Practice. Transl. by R. Nice. Polity Press, Cambridge, 1990. (French original, Le sens pratique, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, Peter H.: Computer Supported Coordination, Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, 1996. – Risø-R-890(EN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, Peter H.; Kjeld Schmidt; and Uffe Kock Wiil: ‘Supporting shop floor intelligence: A CSCW approach to production planning and control in flexible manufacturing’, in S. C. Hayne (ed.): GROUP’99: International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 14–17 November 1999, Phoenix, AZ, ACM Press, New York, NY, 1999, pp. 111–120.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Harold: Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, NJ, 1967. – Polity Press, Cambridge, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford: The Interpretation of Culture: Selected Essays, Basic Books, New York, NY, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, Rebecca E.: ‘Supporting articulation work using software configuration management systems’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 5, no. 4, 1996a, pp. 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannsen, Gunnar, et al.: ‘Final report of experimental psychology group’, in N. Moray (ed.): Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement, Plenum Press, New York, NY, and London, 1979, pp. 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, Stuart: At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, and Oxford, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George Armitage: ‘What is information measurement?’, The American Psychologist, vol. 8, January 1953, pp. 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George Armitage: ‘The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information’, Psychological Review, vol. 63, no. 2, March 1956, pp. 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moray, Neville (ed.): Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement, Plenum Press, New York, NY, and London, 1979a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moray, Neville: ‘Models and measures of mental workload’, in N. Moray (ed.): Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement, Plenum Press, New York, NY, and London, 1979b, pp. 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, Ulric: Cognition and Reality: Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology, W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, CA, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttgens, Patrick: The Story of Architecture, Phaidon Press, London, 1997. (2nd ed.; 1st ed., 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles: ‘The Organizational Context of Human Factors Engineering’, Administrative Science Quaterly, vol. 28, December 1983, pp. 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles: Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Basic Books, New York, NY, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles: Complex Organizations. A Critical Essay, Random House, New York, NY, 1986. (3rd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Peter C.: On the Evolution of Human Behavior: The Argument from Animals to Man, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, Karl: Skyscraper: The Making of a Building Macmillan, London, 1989. – Penguin Books, New York, NY, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Kjeld: ‘Riding a tiger, or computer supported cooperative work’, in L. J. Bannon; M. Robinson; and K. Schmidt (eds.): ECSCW’91: Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 24–27 September 1991, Amsterdam, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991a, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Kjeld: ‘Computer support for cooperative work in advanced manufacturing’, International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, vol. 1, no. 4, October 1991b, pp. 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Kjeld: ‘Cooperative work: A conceptual framework’, in J. Rasmussen; B. Brehmer; and J. Leplat (eds.): Distributed Decision Making: Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work, Wiley, Chichester, 1991c, pp. 75–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Kjeld: ‘Cooperative work and its articulation: Requirements for computer support’, Travail Humain, vol. 57, no. 4, December 1994a, pp. 345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Kjeld (ed.): Social Mechanisms of Interaction, Computing Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, September 1994e. COMIC Deliverable D3.2.<http://ftp://ftp.comp.lancs.ac.uk/pub/comic>

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Kjeld: ‘Of maps and scripts: The status of formal constructs in cooperative work’, in S. C. Hayne and W. Prinz (eds.): GROUP’97: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 16–19 November 1997, Phoenix, AZ, ACM Press, New York, NY, 1997, pp. 138–147.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Kjeld: ‘The critical role of workplace studies in CSCW’, in P. Luff; J. Hindmarsh; and C. C. Heath (eds.): Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000, pp. 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, Claude E.: ‘A mathematical theory of communication’, The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, July, October 1948, pp. 379–423, 623–656.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Dan Z., et al.: ‘Visual re-representation of database information: the flight data strip in air traffic control’, in M. Tauber; D. E. Mahling; and F. Arefi (eds.): Cognitive Aspects of Visual Languages and Visual Interfaces, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 349–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A.: Models of Thought, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, and London, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh: ‘The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving’, in L. Gasser and M. Huhns (eds.): Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, Pitman, London, 1989, pp. 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L., et al.: Social Organization of Medical Work, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, and London, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Lucy A.: ‘Response to Vera and Simon’s situated action: A symbolic interpretation’, Cognitive Science, vol. 17, no. 1, January–March 1993a, pp. 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Talbot J.: ‘Language constructing language: The implications of reflexivity for linguistic theory’, Language Sciences, vol. 22, 2000, pp. 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, James D.: Organizations in Action: Social Science Base of Administrative Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, David: ‘The ad hoc collective work of building Gothic cathedrals with templates, string, and geometry’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 18, no. 3, Summer 1993, pp. 315–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmidt, K. (2008). Remarks on the Complexity of Cooperative Work (2002). In: Cooperative Work and Coordinative Practices. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-068-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-068-1_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84800-067-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84800-068-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics