Abdel-Hamid, T.K., Sengupta, K. and Ronan, D., Software project control: an experimental investigation of judgement with fallible information, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(6): 603–612, 1993.
Anda, B.C.D. and Hansen, K., A case study on the application of UML in legacy development. In ISESE’2006 (Fifth ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering), J. Maldonado and C. Wohlin (eds.), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, ACM Press, September 21–22, pp. 124–133, 2006.
Anda, B.C.D., Hansen, K., Gullesen, I. and Thorsen, H.K., Experiences from using a UML-based development method in a large safety-critical project, Empirical Software Engineering, 11(4): 555–581, 2006.
Arisholm, E., Briand, L.C., Hove, S.E. and Labiche, Y., The impact of UML documentation on software maintenance: an experimental evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 32(6): 365–381, 2006.
Bacharach, S.B., Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 496–515, 1989.
Baker, P., Loh, S. and Weil, F., Model-driven engineering in a large industrial context–motorola case study. In MoDELS 2005, LNCS 3713, L. Briand and C. Williams (eds.), New York, Springer-Verlag, pp. 476–491, 2005.
Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173–1182, 1986.
Basili, V.R., Editorial, Empirical Software Engineering, 1(2), 1996.
Basili, V.R., Shull, F. and Lanubile, F., Building knowledge through families of experiments, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 24(4): 456–473, 1999.
Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J. and Jacobson, I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Boston, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1999.
Bunge, M., Scientific Research: The Search for a System, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1967.
Burkhardt, J.M., Detienne, F. and Wiedenbeck, S., Object-oriented program comprehension: effect of expertise, task and phase, Empirical Software Engineering, 7(2): 115–156, 2002.
Carroll, J. and Swatman, P.A., Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research, European Journal of Information Systems, 9: 235–242, 2000.
Cohen, B., Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and Method, 2nd edn, Belmont, CA, Wadsworth Publishing, 1989.
Dobing, B. and Parsons, J., How UML is used, Communications of the ACM, 49(5): 109–113, 2006.
Dewey, J., The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 15, J.A. Boydston, (ed.), Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 1976–1983.
Dubin, R., Theory Building, Free Press, New York, 1978.
Endres, A. and Rombach, D., A Handbook of Software and Systems Engineering. Empirical Observations, Laws and Theories. Fraunhofer IESE Series on Software Engineering, Pearson Education Limited, 2003.
Feynman, R.P., QED–The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, Penguin Science, Harmondsworth, 1985.
Franck, R., The Explanatory Power of Models, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
Glaser H.G. and Strauss A.L., The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Hawthorne, NY, Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.
Godfrey-Smith, P., Pragmatism: philosophical aspects, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 17: 11954–11958, 2001.
Gregor, S., The nature of theory in information systems, MIS Quarterly, 30(3): 611–642, 2006.
Gruber, T.R., A translation approach to portable ontology specifications, Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2): 199–220, 1993.
Haig, B.D., An abductive theory of scientific method, Psychological Methods, 10(4): 371–388, 2005.
Hannay, J.E., Sjøberg, D.I.K. and Dybå, T., A systematic review of theory use in software engineering experiments, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(2): 87–107, 2007.
Hawking, S. and Penrose R., The Nature of Space and Time, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1996.
Herbsleb, D.J. and Mockus, A., Formulation and preliminary test of an empirical theory of coordination in software engineering, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 28(5): 138–147, 2003.
Hevner, A.R. and March, S.T., The information systems research cycle, IEEE Computer Society, 36(119): 111–113, 2003.
Hevner, A., March, S.T., Park, J., and Ram, S, Design science research in information systems, MIS Quarterly, 28(1): 75–105, 2004.
James, W., Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, New York: Longman Green and Co, 1907.
Jørgensen, M. and Sjøberg, D.I.K., Generalization and theory-building in software engineering research. In Empirical Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE2004), IEE Proceedings, pp. 29–36, 2004.
Kitchenham, B.A., Pfleeger, S.L., Pickard, L.M., Jones, P.W., Hoaglin, D.C., El Emam, K. and Rosenberg, J., Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering, IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 28(8): 721–734, 2002.
Land, L.P.W., Wong, B. and Jeffery, R., An extension of the behavioral theory of group performance in software development technical reviews, Proceedings of the Tenth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference Software Engineering Conference, pp. 520–530, 2003.
Lewin, K., The research center for group dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sociometry, 8: 126–135, 1945.
Lindblom, C.E., Alternatives to validity. Some thoughts suggested by Campbell’s guidelines, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8: 509–520, 1987.
Lindsay, R.M. and Ehrenberg, A.S.C., The design of replicated studies, The American Statistician, 47: 217–228, 1993.
Lucas, J.W., Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity, Sociological Theory, 21: 236–253, 2003.
Lynham, S.A., The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3): 221–241, 2002.
MacDonald, A., Russel, D. and Atchison, B. Model-driven development within a legacy system: an industry experience report, Proceedings of the 2005 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC’2005). IEEE Computer Society, pp. 14–22, April 2005.
March, S.T. and Smith, G.F., Design and natural science research on information technology, Decision Support Systems, 15(4): 251–266, 1995.
Markovsky, B., The structure of theories. In Group Processes, M. Foschi and E.J. Lawler, (eds.), Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, pp. 3–24, 1994.
Merton, R.K., Social Theory and Social Structure, 3rd ed, The Free Press, New York, 1968.
Nagel, E., The Structure of Science, Hackett, Indianapolis, 1979.
Peirce, C.S., Collected Papers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1958.
Petit, R.G., Lessons learned applying UML in embedded software systems designs, Proceedings of the Second IEEE Workshop on Software Technologies for Future Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems (WSTFEUS’04), Vienna, Austria, May 11–12, pp., 75–79, 2004.
Popper, K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchison, London, 1959.
Ramanujan, S., Scamell, R.W. and Shah, J.R., An experimental investigation of the impact of individual, program, and organizational characteristics on software maintenance effort, Journal of Systems and Software, 54(2): 137–157, 2000.
Rosenberg, A., Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction, Routledge, London, 2001.
Ruse, M. (1995). Theory. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. T. Honderich, Oxford University Press, New York, 870–871.
Salmon, W.C., Four decades of scientific explanation. In Scientific Explanation, P. Kitcher and W.C. Salmon, (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13, Minnesota Press, Series, pp. 3–219, 1989.
Sandborg, D., Mathematical explanation and the theory of why-questions, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49(4): 603–624, 1998.
Sauer, C, Jeffery, D.R., Land, L. and Yetton, P., The effectiveness of software development technical reviews: a behaviorally Motivated program of research, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(1): 1–14, 2000.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T., Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, 2002.
Simon, H.A., The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
Sjøberg, D.I.K., Dybå, T. and Jørgensen, M., The future of empirical methods in software engineering research. In Future of Software Engineering (FOSE ‘07), L. Briand and A. Wolf, (eds.), IEEE-CS Press, Minneapolis, US, pp. 358–378, 2007.
Sjøberg, D.I.K., Hannay, J.E., Hansen, O., Kampenes, V.B., Karahasanović, A., Liborg, N.-K. and Rekdal, A.C., A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(9): 733–753, 2005.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.
Sutton, R.I. and Staw, B.M., What theory is not, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371–384, 1995.
Thagard, P., Conceptual Revolutions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992.
Tichy, W.F., Should computer scientist experiment more? 16 excuses to avoid experimentation, IEEE Computer, 31(5): 32–40, 1998.
Van Dijk, T.A. and Kintsch, W., Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York, 1983.
Van Fraassen, B., The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, New York, 1980.
Wagner, D.G., The growth of theories. In Group Processes, M. Foschi and E. J. Lawler, (eds.), Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago, pp. 25–42, 1994.
Weber, R., Editor’s comments, MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 3–12, 2003.
Weick, K.E., Theory construction as disciplined imagination, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 516–531, 1989.
Whetten, D.A., What constitutes a theoretical contribution, Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 490–495, 1989.
Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1984.
Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series 5, 3rd ed, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2003.