Skip to main content

Co-Realization: Toward a Principled Synthesis of Ethnomethodology and Participatory Design

  • Chapter
Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts

Abstract

This paper calls for a respecification of IT systems design and development practice as co-realization. Co-realization is an orientation to technology production that develops out of a principled synthesis of ethnomethodology and participatory design. It moves the locus of design and development activities into workplace settings where technologies will be used. Through examples drawn from case studies of IT projects, we show how co-realization, with its stress on design-in-use and the longitudinal involvement by IT professionals in the “lived work” of users, helps to create uniquely adequate, accountable solutions to the problems of IT-organizational integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1998) Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers J (1991) The Janus faces of design. In Bowers J, Benford S (eds.) Studies in Computer Supported Work. Elsevier Science, Burlington, MA, pp. 333–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buscher M, Mogensen P, Shapiro D (1996) Bricolage as a software culture. In Wagner I (ed.) Proceedings of the COSTA4 Workshop on Software Cultures Vienna, December, Technical University of Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büscher M, Shapiro D, Hartswood M, Procter R, Slack R, Voß A, Mogensen P (2002) Promises, premises and risks: Sharing responsibilities, working up trust and sustaining commitment in participatory design projects. In Binder T, Gregory J, Wagner I (eds.) PDC’2002 Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. June, pp. 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button G (2000) The ethnographic tradition and design. Design Studies 21(4): 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A (2000) Balancing lightness with sufficiency. Available at http://members.aol.com/acockburn/papers/barelysufficient.htm. Accessed September 19, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich Y (1998) Developing a language for participation. Research Report 18/98, Department of Computer Science and Business Administration, University of Karlskrona/Ronneby. ISSN 1103–1581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich Y, Eriksèn, Hansson C (2002) PD in the wild; Evolving practices of design in use. In Proceedings of PDC 2002. Malmo, Sweden, 2002. CPSR, pp 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish P, Button G (1998) On “technomethodology”: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Human-Computer Interaction 13(4): 395–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum J, Kyng M (eds.) (1991) Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin J (1990) The computer reaches out. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’90). ACM, New York, pp. 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartswood M, Procter R, Rouncefield M, Sharpe M (2000) Being there and doing IT in the workplace: A case study of a co-development approach in healthcare. In Cherkasky T, Greenbaum J, Mambrey P (eds.) Proceedings of the CPSR/IFIP WG 9.1 Participatory Design Conference. New York, December, pp. 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath C, Luff P (2000) Technology in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J, O’Brien J, Rodden T, Rouncefield M. Ethnography, communication and support for design. In Heath C, Luff P (eds.) Workplace Studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyng M (1995) Making representations work. Special issue of CACM 38(9):46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (2002) Interaction Design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter R, Williams R (1996) Beyond design: Social learning and CSCW-Some lessons from innovation studies. In Shapiro DS, Tauber MJ, Traunmüller R (eds.). The Design of CSCW and Groupware Systems. Elsevier Science, Burlington, MA, pp. 445–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall D, Rouncefield, M, Hughes J (1995) Chalk and cheese: BPR and ethnomethodologically informed ethnography in CSCW. In Harmolin H, Sunblad Y, Schmidt, K (eds.) Proceedings of ECSCW ‘95, Stockholm. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Ashgate Arena, Aldershot (revised 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharrock W (1974) On owning knowledge. In Turner R (ed.) Ethnomethodology.. Penguin Education, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (1995a) Representations of work. Editorial, special issue of CACM 38(9): 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (1995b) Making work visible. Special issue of CACM 38(9): 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman L (1999) Located accountabilities in technology production. Available at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc039ls.html. Accessed September 21, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg R, Blomberg J, Suchman L (1999) Moving document collections online: The evolution of a shared repository. In: Bodker S, Kyng M, Schmidt K (eds.) Proceedings of ECSCW’99, Copenhagen. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turk D, France R, Rumpe B (2002) Limitations of agile software processes. In Proceedings of Third International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Italy, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss A, Procter R, Williams R (2000) Innovation in use: Interleaving day-to-day operation and systems development. In Cherkasky T, Greenbaum J, Mambrey P (eds.) Proceedings of the CPSR/IFIP WG 9.1 Participatory Design Conference. New York, December, pp. 192–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss A, Procter R, Slack R, Hartswood M, Williams R, Rouncefield M (2001) Production management as ordinary action: An investigation of situated, resourceful action in production planning and control. In Levine J (ed.) Proceedings of 20th UK Planning and Scheduling (SIG) Workshop. Edinburgh, December, pp. 230–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams R, Slack R, Stewart J (2000) Social learning in multimedia, final report to European commission, DGXII TSER. University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar S (1991) Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In Law J (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters. Routledge, London, pp. 58–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartswood, M. et al. (2008). Co-Realization: Toward a Principled Synthesis of Ethnomethodology and Participatory Design. In: Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-901-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-901-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-900-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-901-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics