Towards Understanding Motivational and Emotional Factors in Driver Behaviour: Comfort Through Satisficing

  • Heikki Summala

Abstract

The early’ skill models’ of driver behaviour and safety posited that the safety of a driver is mainly determined by the level of his or her perceptual and motor skills in relation to the task demands: a crash — a failure in driver performance —occurs when task demands exceed driver capabilities (e.g., Blumenthal, 1968). Consequently, improving driver skills and reducing task demands would make traffic safer. Obviously, however, this early concept was too simple. A good piece of counterevidence, among others, came from (1974), who showed that classified U.S. race drivers have more crashes per exposure than average drivers — and also more speeding tickets. At least the advanced skills which make those drivers competitive in race track did not save them from crashes, as they obviously traded skills for speed on ordinary roads, too. Theorists and road safety people indeed forgot that driving is a self-paced task and drivers themselves do determine their task demands to a large extent (Näätänen and Summala, 1974). The behavioural adaptation concept is now one of basic tenets in traffic psychology, here defined by (1996): ‘the driver is inclined to react to changes in the traffic system, whether they be in the vehicle, in the road environment, in road and weather conditions, or in his/her own skills or states, and that this reaction occurs in accordance with his/her motives’.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned action. Organizational Behavior and Human Deision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baguley, C.J. (1988). ‘Running the red’ at signals on high-speed roads. Traffic Engineering and Control, 29, 415–420.Google Scholar
  3. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. and Damasio, A.R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, S. (1966). Man and motor cars. Seeker & Warburg, London.Google Scholar
  5. Blumenthal, M. (1968). Dimensions of the traffic safety problem. Traffic Safety Research Review, 12, 7–12.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, I.D. (1980). Error-correction probability as a determinant of drivers’ subjective risk. In D.J. Oborne and J.A. Levis(Eds.). Human factors in transport research (Vol. 2, pp. 311–319). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. Canudas-de-Wit, C., Bechart, H., Claeys, X., Dolcini, P. and Martinez, J.J. (2005). Fun-to-drive by feedback. European Journal of Control, 11(4/5), 353–383.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Connolly, T. and Åberg, L. (1993). Some contagion models of speeding. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 25(1), 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Damasio, A.R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  10. De Vos, A.P., Theeuwes, J., Hoekstra, W. and Coëmet, M.J. (1997). Behavioral aspects of automatic vehicle guidance. Relationship between headway and driver comfort. Transportation Research Record, 1573, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donges, E. (1978). A two-level model of driver steering behavior. Human Factors, 20, 691–707.Google Scholar
  12. Evans, L. (1991). Traffic safety and the driver. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Fajen, B.R. (2005). Calibration, information, and control strategies for braking to avoid a collision. Journal of Experimental Psychology — Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 480–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finucane, M.L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P. and Johnson, S.M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuller, R. (2000). The task-capability interface model of the driving process. Journal Recherche-Transport-Sécurité (RTS), 66, 47–59.Google Scholar
  17. Fuller, R. (2004). Zero risk versus target risk: Can they both be right? Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Traffic and Transport Psychology 2004, Symposium on Traffic Psychology Theories. Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Fuller, R. (2005). Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gameiro da Silva, M.C. (2002). Measurements of comfort in vehicles. Measurement Science and Technology, 13, R41–R60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  21. Gibson, J.J. and Crooks, L.E. (1938). A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. American Journal of Psychology, 51, 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Godthelp, H. (1988). The limits of path error-neglecting in straight lane driving. Ergonomics, 31, 609–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Godthelp, H., Milgram, P. and Blaauw, G.J. (1984). The development of a time-related measure to describe driving strategy. Human Factors, 26, 257–268.Google Scholar
  24. Goodrich, M.A., Stirling, W.C. and Boer, E.R. (2000). Satisficing revisited. Minds and Machines, 10(1), 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greeno, J.G. (1994). Gibson’s Affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Groeger, J. (2000). Understanding Driving. Psychology Press, Hove.Google Scholar
  27. Haglund, M. and Åberg, L. (2000). Speed choice in relation to speed limit and influences from other drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 3(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hall, E.T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Doubleday, Garden City.Google Scholar
  29. Hancock, P.A. and Caird, J.K. (1993). Experimental evaluation of a model of mental workload. Human Factors, 35, 413–429.Google Scholar
  30. Hancock, P.A. and Warm, J.S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519–537.Google Scholar
  31. Harms, L. (1991). Variation in drivers’ cognitive load: Effects of driving through village areas and rural junctions. Ergonomics, 34, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart, S.G. and Staveland, L.E. (1988). Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock and N. Meshkati (Eds.). Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Elsevier, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hollnagel, E. (2002). Time and time again. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hollnagel, E. and Woods, D.D. (2005). Joint cognitive systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jiang, Z.Y., Streit, D.A. and El-Gindy, M. (2001). Heavy vehicle ride comfort: Literature survey. Heavy Vehicle Systems — International Journal of Vehicle Design, 8(3/4), 258–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawton, R., Parker, D., Stradling, S.G. and Manstead, A.S.R. (1997). Predicting road traffic accidents: The role of social deviance and violations. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 249–262.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, D.N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception, 5, 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKenna, F.P. (1982). The human factor in driving accidents: An overview of approaches and problems. Ergonomics, 25, 867–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Näätänen, R. and Summala, H. (1974). A model for the role of motivational factors in drivers’ decision-making. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Näätänen, R. and Summala, H. (1976). Road-user behavior and traffic accidents. North-Holland/American Elsevier, Amsterdam/New York.Google Scholar
  41. Niittymäki, J. and Pursula, M. (1994). Valoohjattujen liittymien simulointi ja ajodynamiikka (Simulation of signalized intersections and driving dynamics) (Publication No. 81). Helsinki University of Technology, Transportation Engineering.Google Scholar
  42. Ohta, H. (1993). Individual differences in driving distance headway. In A.G. Gale et al. (Eds.). Vision in vehicles (Vol. 4, pp. 91–100). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  43. Olson, P.L. and Sivak, M. (1984). Discomfort glare from automobile headlights. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 13, 296–303.Google Scholar
  44. Ouellette, J.A. and Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Räsänen, M. and Summala, H. (2000). Car drivers’ adjustments to cyclists at roundabouts. Transportation Human Factors, 2, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reymond, G., Kemeny, A., Droulez, J. and Berthoz, A. (2001). Role of lateral acceleration in curve driving: Driver model and experiments on a real vehicle and a driving simulator. Human Factors, 43(3), 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robertson, L.S. and Pless, I.B. (2002). For and against: Does risk homoeostasis theory have implications for road safety. British Medical Journal, 324, 1151–1152.Google Scholar
  48. Rothengatter, T. (1988). Risk and the absence of pleasure: A motivational approach to modelling road user behaviour. Ergonomics, 31, 599–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roufs, J.A.J. and Boschman, M.C. (1997). Text quality metrics for visual display units. 1. Methodological aspects. Displays, 18(1), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rumar, K. (1988). Collective risk but individual safety. Ergonomics, 31, 507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rumar, K., Berggrund, U., Jernberg, P. and Ytterbom, U. (1976). Driver reaction to a technical safety measure: Studded tires. Human Factors, 18, 443–454.Google Scholar
  52. Russell, J.A. and Barrett, L.F. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sivak, M., Flannagan, M., Ensing, M. and Simmons, C.J. (1991). Discomfort glare is task dependent. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 12, 152–159.Google Scholar
  55. Slovic, P., Finucane, M.L., Peters, E. and MacGregor, D.G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smeed, R.J. (1949). Some statistical aspects of road safety research. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 112, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Summala, H. (1985). Modeling driver task: A pessimistic prediction? In L. Evans and R.C. Schwing (Eds.). Human behavior and traffic safety (pp. 43–65). Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Summala, H. (1988). Risk control is not risk adjustment: The zero-risk theory of driver behaviour and its implications. Ergonomics, 31, 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Summala, H. (1996). Accident risk and driver behaviour. Safety Science, 22, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Summala, H. (1997). Hierarchical model of behavioural adaptation and traffic accidents. In T. Rothengatter and E. Carbonell Vaya(Eds.). Traffic and transport psychology (pp. 41–52). Pergamon, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  61. Summala, H. (2000). Brake reaction times and driver behavior analysis. Transportation Human Factors, 2, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Summala, H. (2005). Traffic psychology theories: Towards understanding driving behaviour and safety efforts. In G. Underwood (Ed.). Traffic and transport psychology (pp. 383–394). Elsevier, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Summala, H. and Koivisto, I. (1990). Unalerted drivers’ brake reaction times: Older drivers compensate their slower reactions by driving more slowly. In T. Benjamin (Ed.). Driving behaviour in a social context (pp. 680–683). Paradigme, Caen.Google Scholar
  64. Summala, H. and Merisalo, A. (1980). A psychophysical method for determining the effect of studded tires on safety. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Summala, H. and Räsänen, M. (2000). Top-down and bottom-up processes in driver behavior at roundabouts and crossroads. Transportation Human Factors, 2, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sylwan, C. (1919). Trafiksäkerheten på gata och landsväg (Traffic safety on streets and highways). Industritidningen i Norden (No. 50), 357–364.Google Scholar
  67. Taieb-Maimon, M. and Shinar, D. (2001). Minimum and comfortable driving headways: Reality versus perception. Human Factors, 43(1), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor, D.H. (1964). Drivers’ galvanic skin response and the risk of accident. Ergonomics, 7, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Theeuwes, J., Alferdinck, J. and Perel, M. (2002). Relation between glare and driving performance. Human Factors, 44(1), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vaa, T. (2004). Developing a driver behaviour model based on emotions and feelings: Proposing building blocks and interrelationships. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Traffic and Transport Psychology 2004, Symposium on Traffic Psychology Theories. Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
  71. Van der Horst, R. and Wilmink, A. (1986). Drivers’ decision making at signalized intersections: An optimization of the yellow timing. Traffic Engineering & Control, 27, 615–622.Google Scholar
  72. Van der Horst, A.R.A. (1990). A Time-Based Analysis of Road User Behaviour in Normal and Critical Encounters. TNO Institute for Perception, Soesterberg.Google Scholar
  73. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A. and Moonen, A. (1998). Habit versus planned behaviour: A field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 111–128.Google Scholar
  74. Warren, W.H. (1984). Perceiving affordances — Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology — Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Warren, W.H. and Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through Apertures — Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology ? Human Perception and Performance, 13(3), 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wikman, A.-S., Laakso, M. and Summala, H. (1997). Time sharing of car drivers as a function of driving speed and task eccentricity. In The 13th Triennial Congress of International Ergonomics Association. Tampere, Finland, June 29–July 4, 1997.Google Scholar
  77. Wikman, A.S., Nieminen, T. and Summala, H. (1998). Driving experience and time-sharing during in-car tasks on roads of different width. Ergonomics, 41(3), 358–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wikman, A.S. and Summala, H. (2005). Aging and time-sharing in highway driving. Optometry and Vision Science, 82(8), 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wilde, G.J.S. (1982). The theory of risk homeostasis: Implications for safety and health. Risk Analysis, 2, 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van Winsum, W. and Heino, A. (1996). Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking. Ergonomics, 39(4), 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Williams, A.F. and O’Neill, B. (1974). On-the-road driving records of licensed race drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 6, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wong, Y.D. and Nicholson, A. (1992). Driver behavior at horizontal curves — risk compensation and the margin of safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 24(4), 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heikki Summala
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations