Multiscale Computational Engineering of Bones: State-of-the-Art Insights for the Future
Computational models provide a platform that is equivalent to an in vivo, in vitro, and in situ or ex vivo model platform. Indeed, the National Institutes of Health have made the development of predictive computational models a high priority of the “Roadmap for the Future” (http://nihroadmap.nih.gov/overview.asp; see especially “New Pathways to Discovery”). The power of computational models lies in their usefulness to predict which variables are most likely to influence a given result, simulation of the system response to changes in that variable, and optimization of system variables to achieve a desired bio logical effect. Typically, these models are computer representations of the actual system, based on experimentally determined parameters and system variables; increasingly these computer models are referred to as in silico models (Fig. 10.1).
KeywordsPore Pressure Medullary Cavity Osteocyte Density Transverse Layer Pericellular Space
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Anderson EJ, Savrin J, Cooke M, Dean D, Knothe Tate ML (2005) Evaluation and optimization of tissue engineering scaffolds using computational fluid dynamics. In: Annual Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society, Baltimore.Google Scholar
- 3.Bassett CAL (1966) Electromechanical factors regulating bone architecture. In: Fleisch H, Blackwood HJJ, Owen M, eds. Third European Symposium on Calcified Tissues. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
- 6.Knothe Tate ML (1994) Diffusive and convective transport in the osteon. M.S. thesis, Divisions of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Design, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Informatics, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.Google Scholar
- 7.Knothe Tate ML (1997) Theoretical and experimental study of load-induced fluid flow phenomena in compact bone. Ph.D. thesis, Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich.Google Scholar
- 11.Knothe Tate ML, Niederer P (1998) A theoretical FE-based model developed to predict the relative contribution of convective and diffusive transport mechanisms for the maintenance of local equilibria within cortical bone. Adv Heat Mass Transfer Biotechnol 40:133–142.Google Scholar
- 13.Lanyon L, Mosley J, Torrance A (1994) Effects of the viscoelastic behavior of the rat ulna loading model. Bone 25:383–384.Google Scholar
- 14.Maurer B, Lehmann C (2006), Die Statik von Knochen. In: Karl Culmann und die graphische Statik. Zeichnen, die Sprache des Ingenieurs. Ernst und Sohn, Berlin.Google Scholar
- 17.Mishra S, Knothe Tate M (2004) Allometric scaling relationships in microarchitecture of mammalian cortical bone. 50th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, 29:0401.Google Scholar
- 18.Niederer PF, Knothe Tate ML, Steck R, Boesiger P (2000) Some remarks on intravascular and extravascular transport and flow dynamics. Int J Cardiovasc Med Sci 3:21–31.Google Scholar
- 24.Sidler H, Steck R, Knothe Tate ML (2006) Site-Specific Porosity and its Impact on Load-Induced Fluid Movement in Cortical Bone, 52nd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Chicago, 31:1591.Google Scholar
- 27.Tami AE, Niederer P, Steck R, Knothe Tate ML (2003) New insights into mechanical loading behavior of the ulna-radius-interosseous membrane construct based on finite element analysis of the ulnar compression model. 49th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, New Orleans. 28:1196.Google Scholar
- 29.Wolff J (1892) Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: Herschwald Verlag.Google Scholar