Abstract
Quality engineers often face the job of identifying process or product design parameters that optimize performance response. The first step is to construct a model, using historical or experimental data, that relates the design parameters to the response measures. The next step is to identify the best design parameters based on the model. Clearly, the model itself is only an approximation of the true relationship between the design parameters and the responses. The advances in optimization theory and computer technology have enabled quality engineers to obtain a good solution more efficiently by taking into account the inherent uncertainty in these empirically based models.
Two widely used techniques for parameter optimization, described with examples in this chapter, are the response surface methodology (RSM) and Taguchi loss function. In both methods, the response model is assumed to be fully correct at each step. In this chapter we show how to enhance both methods by using robust optimization tools that acknowledge the uncertainty in the models to find even better solutions. We develop a family of models from the confidence region of the model parameters and show how to use sophistical optimization techniques to find better design parameters over the entire family of approximate models.
Section 12.1 of the chapter gives an introduction to the design parameter selection problem and motivates the need for robust optimization. Section 12.2 presents the robust optimization approach to address the problem of optimizing empirically based response functions by developing a family of models from the confidence region of the model parameters. In Sect. 12.2 robust optimization is compared to traditional optimization approaches where the empirical model is assumed to be true and the optimization is conducted without considering the uncertainty in the parameter estimates. Simulation is used to make the comparison in the context of response surface methodology, a widely used method to optimize products and processes that is briefly described in the section. Section 12.3 introduces a refined technique, called weighted robust optimization, where more-likely points in the confidence region of the empirically determined parameters are given heavier weight than less-likely points. We show that this method provides even more effective solutions compared to robust optimization without weights. Section 12.4 discusses Taguchiʼs loss function and how to leverage robust optimization methods to obtain better solutions when the loss function is estimated from empirical experimental data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- CCD:
-
central composite design
- QCQP:
-
quadratically constrained quadratic programming
- RSM:
-
response surface methodology
- SDP:
-
semidefinite program
- SSE:
-
sum of squared errors
References
G. E. P. Box, W. G. Hunter, J. S. Hunter: Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building (Wiley, New York 1978)
G. E. P. Box, N. R. Draper: Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces (Wiley, New York 1987)
R. H. Myers, D. C. Montgomery: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (Wiley, New York 1995)
A. I. Khuri, J. A. Cornell: Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses (Marcel Dekker, New York 1996)
G. E. P. Box, K. B. Wilson: On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 13, 1–45 (1951)
D. Xu, S. L. Albin: Robust optimization of experimentally derived objective functions, IIE Trans. 35, 793–802 (2003)
C. F. Wu, M. Hamada: Experiments: Planning, Analysis, And Parameter Design Optimization (Wiley, New York 2000)
E. Erhardt, H. Mai: The search for the optimal paper helicopter, personal communication, (2002) http://www.stat.unm.edu/∼erike/projects/Erhardt_-Erik_rsmproj.pdf
G. E. P. Box, P. Y. T. Liu: Statistics as a catalyst to learning by scientific method, J. Qual. Technol. 31, 1–15 (1999)
K. Shimizu, E. Aiyoshi: Necessary conditions for Min-Max problems and algorithms by a relaxation procedure, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 25, 62–66 (1980)
R. G. Miller: Simultaneous Statistical Inference (McGraw–Hill, New York 1966)
R. H. Myers: Classical and Modern Regression with Applications (PWS–Kent, Boston 1990)
D. Xu: Multivariate statistical Modeling and robust optimization in quality engineering, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Rutgers University (2001)
L. Vandenberghe, S. Boyd: Semidefinite programming, SIAM Rev. 38, 49–95 (1996)
F. Alizadeh, S. Schmieta: Optimization with semidefinite, quadratic and linear constraints, Rutcor Res. Rep., Rutgers University , 23–97 (1997)
E. Frazzoli, Z. H. Mao, J. H. Oh, E. Feron: Resolution of conflicts involving many aircraft via semidefinite programming, MIT Research Report , MIT–ICAT 99–5 (1999)
F. Alizadeh, J. P. Haeberly, M. Nayakkankuppam, M. Overton, S. Schmieta: SDPPACK Userʼs Guide. NYU Computer Science Department Technical Report (1997)
J. Sturm: Using SeDuMi 1.0x, a Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones, Optim. Methods Softw. 11, 625–663 (1999)
D. Jones, C. Perttunen, B. Stuckman: Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant, J. Opt. Theory Appl. 79, 157–181 (1993)
M. Bjorkman, K. Holmstrom: Global optimization using the DIRECT algorithm in Matlab, Adv. Model. Opt. 1, 17–37 (1999)
G. Taguchi: System of Experimental Design (Unipub/Kraus, White Plains 1987)
W. J. Welch, T. K. Yu, S. M. Kang, J. Sacks: Computer experiments for quality control by robust design, J. Qual. Technol. 22, 15–22 (1990)
A. C. Shoemaker, K. L. Tsui, C. F. J. Wu: Economical experimentation methods for robust parameter design, Technometrics 33, 415–428 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag
About this entry
Cite this entry
Albin, S., Xu, D. (2006). Robust Optimization in Quality Engineering. In: Pham, H. (eds) Springer Handbook of Engineering Statistics. Springer Handbooks. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-288-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-288-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-806-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-288-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)