Skip to main content

Antegrade Continent Colonic Conduit

  • Chapter
Constipation

Conclusion

Thus far, CCC surgery has been performed in heterogeneous groups of patients with chronic intractable constipation in whom pathophysiology and etiology often differed. For example, patients with both slow-transit constipation and disordered rectal evacuation, secondary to either a mechanical (large rectocoele) or functional obstruction (pelvic floor dyssynergia) have been included, as have patients with lifelong idiopathic symptoms, as well as patients who have acquired their symptoms following pelvic surgery (hysterectomy; secondary to continence-restoring operations). In addition, we have combined CCC formation with an ESGN procedure, as part of total anorectal reconstruction for patients born with anorectal atresia, who have had a poor functional result (persistent soiling, constipation) following initial surgery. Although early results with the CCC are promising, and equivalent to those of the more established ACE, with successful evacuation, improved continence, and resolution of abdominal symptoms appearing possible in all patient groups studied, the numbers are small and controlled trials (perhaps in comparison to other methods of antegrade irrigation), involving more homogeneous patient groups, may help to identify specific determinants of success for this procedure. Certainly, patient education and multidisciplinary support are integral to obtaining a successful outcome, and patients must be highly motivated and be capable of self-administering the enema.

In our experience, the CCC has particularly revolutionized bowel care in a small highly selected subset of patients with chronic constipation or soiling/constipation secondary to anorectal atresia, who wish to avoid a permanent end-stoma. Notably, failure of this procedure does not preclude further surgical intervention. Despite these very exciting preliminary results, its place as a therapy for idiopathic constipation remains to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hasegawa H, Radley S, Fatah C, Keighley MRB. Long-term results of colorectal resection for slow transit constipation. Colorectal Dis 1999;1:141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Knowles CH, Scott M, Lunniss PJ. Outcome of colectomy for slow transit constipation. Ann Surg 1999;230:627–638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams NS, Hughes SF, Stuchfield B. Continent colonic conduit for rectal evacuation in severe constipation. Lancet 1994;343:1321–1324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wald A. Outlet dysfunction constipation. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2001;4:293–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sotos JF, Cutler EA, Finkel MA, Doody D. Hypocalcemic coma following two pediatric phosphate enemas. Pediatrics 1977;60:305–307.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweeney JL, Hewett P, Riddell P, Hoffmann DC. Rectal gangrene: a complication of phosphate enema. Med J Aust 1986;144:374–375.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith I, Carr N, Corrado OJ, Young A. Rectal necrosis after a phosphate enema. Age Ageing 1987;16:328–330.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell AM. Colonic perforation with a phosphate enema. J R Soc Med 1990;83:54–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hewitt J, Reeve J, Rigby J, Cox AG. Whole-gut irrigation in preparation for large-bowel surgery. Lancet 1973;2:337–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crapp AR, Tillotson P, Powis SJ, Cooke WT, Alexander-Williams J. Preparation of the bowel by whole-gut irrigation. Lancet 1975;2:1239–1240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith RG, Currie JE, Walls AD. Whole gut irrigation: a new treatment for constipation. Br Med J 1978;2:396–397.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dueholm S, Rubinstein E, Reipurth G. Preparation for elective colorectal surgery. A randomized, blinded comparison between oral colonic lavage and whole-gut irrigation. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:360–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dudley HA, Racliffe AG, McGeehan D. Intraoperative irrigation of the colon to permit primary anastomosis. Br J Surg 1980;67:80–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Radcliffe AG, Dudley HA. Intraoperative antegrade irrigation of the large intestine. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;156:721–723.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Muir EG. Safety in colonic resection. Proc R Soc Med 1968;61:401–406.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM. Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema. Lancet 1990;336:1217–1218.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Squire R, Kiely EM, Carr B, Ransley PG, Duffy PG. The clinical application of the Malone antegrade colonic enema. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:1012–1015.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitrofanoff P. Cystostomie continente transappendiculare dans le traitement des vessies neurologiques. Chir Pediatr 1980;21:297–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Webb HW, Barraza MA, Crump JM. Laparoscopic appendicostomy for management of fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:457–458.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koyle MA, Kaji DM, Duque M, Wild J, Galansky SH. The Malone antegrade continence enema for neurogenic and structural fecal incontinence and constipation. J Urol 1995;154:759–761.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Malone PS, Curry JI, Osborne A. The antegrade continence enema procedure why, when and how? World J Urol 1998;16:274–278.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Curry JI, Osborne A, Malone PS. How to achieve a successful Malone antegrade continence enema. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:138–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Curry JI, Osborne A, Malone PS. The MACE procedure: experience in the United Kingdom. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:338–340.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yerkes EB, Cain MP, King S, et al. The Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: quality of life and family perspective. J Urol 2003;169:320–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill J, Stott S, MacLennan I. Antegrade enemas for the treatment of severe idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 1994;81:1490–1491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vos A, Cuesta M, Meuwissen S. Antegrade colonic enema (ACE): a new therapeutic approach to chronic constipation. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 1996;26:225–226.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerharz EW, Vik V, Webb G, Leaver R, Shah PJ, Woodhouse CR. The value of the MACE (Malone antegrade colonic enema) procedure in adult patients. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:544–547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Krogh K, Laurberg S. Malone antegrade continence enema for faecal incontinence and constipation in adults. Br J Surg 1998;85:974–977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rongen MJ, van der Hoop AG, Baeten CG. Cecal access for antegrade colon enemas in medically refractory slow-transit constipation: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:1644–1649.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Christensen P, Kvitzau B, Krogh K, Buntzen S, Laurberg S. Neurogenic colorectal dysfunction—use of new antegrade and retrograde colonic wash-out methods. Spinal Cord 2000;38:255–261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Monti PR, Lara RC, Dutra MA, de Carvalho JR. New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle. Urology 1997;49:112–115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marsh PJ, Kiff ES. Ileocaecostomy: an alternative surgical procedure for antegrade colonic enema. Br J Surg 1996;83:507–508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Christensen P, Buntzen S, Krogh K, Laurberg S. Ileal neoappendicostomy for antegrade colonic irrigation. Br J Surg 2001;88:1637–1638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tackett LD, Minevich E, Benedict JF, Wacksman J, Sheldon CA. Appendiceal versus ileal segment for antegrade continence enema. J Urol 2002;167:683–686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shandling B, Chait PG, Richards HF. Percutaneous cecostomy: a new technique in the management of fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:534–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fonkalsrud EW, Dunn JC, Kawaguchi AI. Simplified technique for antegrade continence enemas for fecal retention and incontinence. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:457–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Fukunaga K, Kimura K, Lawrence JP, Soper RT, Phearman LA. Button device for antegrade enema in the treatment of incontinence and constipation. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:1038–1039.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Duel BP, Gonzalez R. The button cecostomy for management of fecal incontinence. Pediatr Surg Int 1999;15:559–561.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gauderer MW, Decou JM, Boyle JT. Sigmoid irrigation tube for the management of chronic evacuation disorders. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:348–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Heriot AG, Tilney HS, Simson JN. The application of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy to the management of obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:700–702.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McAndrew HF, Malone PS. Continent catheterizable conduits: which stoma, which conduit and which reservoir? BJU Int 2002;89:86–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE. Severe chronic constipation of young women: “idiopathic slow transit constipation.” Gut 1986;27:41–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hughes SF, Williams NS. Antegrade enemas for the treatment of severe idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 1995;82:567.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hughes SF, Williams NS. Continent colonic conduit for the treatment of faecal incontinence associated with disordered evacuation. Br J Surg 1995;82:1318–1320.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Eccersley AJ, Maw A, Williams NS. Comparative study of two sites of colonic conduit placement in the treatment of constipation due to rectal evacuatory disorders. Br J Surg 1999;86:647–650.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Maw A, Eccersley AJ, Wiliams NS. Ileocaecostomy: an alternative surgical procedure for antegrade colonic enema. Br J Surg 1996;83:1304–1305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Proano M, Camilleri M, Phillips SF, Brown ML, Thomforde GM. Transit of solids through the human colon: regional quantification in the unprepared bowel. Am J Physiol 1990;258 (Gastrointest Liver Physiol 21):G856–862.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kamm MA, Van Der Sijp JR, Lennard-Jones JE. Observations on the characteristics of stimulated defaecation in severe idiopathic constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:197–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lubowski DZ, Meagher AP, Smart RC, Butler SP. Scintigraphic assessment of colonic function during defaecation. Int J Colorect Dis 1995;10:91–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Halls J. Bowel content shift during normal defaecation. Proc R Soc Med 1965;58:859–860.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bassotti G, Gaburri M, Imbimbo BP, et al. Colonic mass movements in idiopathic chronic constipation. Gut 1988;29:1173–1179.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dinning PG, Bampton PA, Andre J, et al. Abnormal predefecatory colonic motor patterns define constipation in obstructed defecation. Gastroenterology 2004;127:49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Saunders JR, Williams NS, Eccersley AJ. The combination of electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter and continent colonic conduit: a step forward for total anorectal reconstruction? Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:354–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Graf JL, Strear C, Bratton B, et al. The antegrade continence enema procedure: a review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1294–1296.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE, Young AC. A new method for studying gut transit times using radioopaque markers. Gut 1969;10:842–847.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Scott SM, Knowles CH, Lunniss PJ, Newell M, Garvie N, Williams NS. Scintigraphic assessment of colonic transit in patients with slow transit constipation arising de novo (chronic idiopathic) and following pelvic surgery or childbirth. Br J Surg 2001;88:405–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, et al. Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1133–1141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:899–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Farthing MJ, Lennard-Jones JE. Sensibility of the rectum to distension and the anorectal distension reflex in ulcerative colitis. Gut 1978;19:64–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Penning C, Steens J, van der Schaar PJ, et al. Motor and sensory function of the rectum in different subtypes of constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol 2001;36:32–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Knowles CH, Eccersley AJ, Scott SM, Walker SM, Reeves B, Lunniss PJ. Linear discriminant analysis of symptoms in patients with chronic constipation: validation of a new scoring system (KESS). Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:1419–1426.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Locke GR III, Pemberton JH, Phillips SF. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: guidelines on constipation. Gastroenterology 2000;119:1761–1778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chan CL, Scott SM, Knowles CH, Lunniss PJ. Exaggerated rectal adaptation—another cause of outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 2001;3:141–142.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Obstructed defecation. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:280–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Gladman MA, Scott SM, Chan CL, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Rectal hyposensitivity: prevalence and clinical impact in patients with intractable constipation and fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gladman MA, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Clinical and physiological findings, and possible aetiological factors of rectal hyposensitivity. Br J Surg 2003;90:860–866.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kamm MA. Constipation and its management. BMJ 2003;327:459–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Stuchfield B. The continent colonic conduit in the management of severe constipation. Br J Nurs 1995;4:1012–1016.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Keighley MRB, Williams NS, eds. Constipation. In: Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon, 2nd ed. London: WB Saunders, 1999:737–755.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Saunders JR, Eccersley AJ, Williams NS. Use of a continent colonic conduit for treatment of refractory evacuatory disorder following construction of an electrically stimulated gracilis neoanal sphincter. Br J Surg 2003;90:1416–1421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991;338:1166–1169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Yerkes EB, Rink RC, King S, Cain MP, Kaefer M, Casale AJ. Tap water and the Malone antegrade continence enema: a safe combination? J Urol 2001;166:1476–1478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Schreiber CK, Stone AR. Fatal hypernatremia associated with the antegrade continence enema procedure. J Urol 1999;162:1433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Christensen P, Olsen N, Krogh K, Laurberg S. Scintigraphic assessment of antegrade colonic irrigation through an appendicostomy or a neoappendicostomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:1275–1280.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gladman, M.A., Scott, S.M., Williams, N.S. (2006). Antegrade Continent Colonic Conduit. In: Wexner, S.D., Duthie, G.S. (eds) Constipation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-275-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-275-1_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-724-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-275-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics