Skip to main content

Advances in Water Resources Systems Engineering: Applications of Machine Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modern Water Resources Engineering

Part of the book series: Handbook of Environmental Engineering ((HEE,volume 15))

Abstract

There has long existed a dichotomy in the field of water resources systems engineering between simulation and optimization modeling, with each approach having its own advantages and disadvantages. Simulation models provide a means of accurately representing the complex physiochemical, socioeconomic, and legal-administrative behavior of complex water resources systems, but lack the capability of systematically determining optimal water planning and management decisions. Optimization models, on the other hand, excel at automatic determination of optima, while often sacrificing the accurate representation of the underlying water system behavior. Various means of effectively establishing a synergy between simulation and optimization models that accentuates their advantages while minimizing their shortcomings have evolved from the field of artificial intelligence within the province of computer science. Artificial intelligence was defined by John McCarthy in 1955 as “the science and engineering of making intelligent decisions.” Machine learning, as a branch of artificial intelligence, focuses on the development of specific algorithms that allow computerized agents to learn optimal behaviors through interaction with a real or simulated environment. Although there are many aspects of machine learning, the focus here is on agent-based modeling tools for learning optimal decisions and management rule structures for water resources systems under conflicting goals and complex stochastic environments. A wide variety of machine learning tools such as reinforcement learning, artificial neural networks, fuzzy rule-based systems, and evolutionary algorithms are applied herein to complex decision problems in integrated management of multipurpose river-reservoir systems, real-time control of combined sewer systems for pollution reduction, and integrated design and operation of stormwater control systems for sustaining and remediating coastal aquatic ecosystems damaged by intensified urbanization and development.

John W. Labadie is former Senior Editor of the ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Labadie JW, Brazil LE, Corbu I, Johnson LE (eds) (1989) Computerized decision support systems for water managers. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keys AM, Palmer RN (1995) An assessment of shared vision model effectiveness in water resources planning, Proceedings of the 22nd annual water resources planning and management conference. American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, DC, pp 532–535

    Google Scholar 

  3. Labadie JW (2004) Optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. J Water Resour Plann Manage 130(2):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(3):489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ao S-I, Rieger B, Amouzegar MA (eds) (2010) Machine learning and systems engineering, vol 68, Series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Commission on Dams (WCD) (2000) Dams and development: a new framework for decision-making, report of the world commission on dams. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang D, Adams BJ (1986) Optimization of real-time reservoir operations with Markov decision processes. Water Resour Res 22(3):345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Braga BPF, Yeh WG, Becker L, Barros MTL (1991) Stochastic optimization of multiple reservoir system operation. J Water Resour Plann Manage 117(4):471–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tejada-Guibert JA, Johnson SA, Stedinger JR (1995) The value of hydrologic information in stochastic dynamic programming models of a multireservoir system. Water Resour Res 3(10):2571–2579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, J-H, Labadie JW (2007) Stochastic optimization of multi-reservoir systems via reinforcement learning. Water Resour Res 43, No. W11408

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kelman J, Stedinger JR, Cooper LA, Hsu E, Yuan S-Q (1990) Sampling stochastic dynamic programming applied to reservoir operation. Water Resour Res 26(3):447–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaelbling LP, Littman ML, Moore AW (1996) Reinforcement learning: a survey. J Artifi Intell Res 4:237–285

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dreyfus SE, Law AM (1977) The art and theory of dynamic programming. Academic, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ross SM (1983) Introduction to stochastic dynamic programming. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Watkins C, Dayan P (1992) Technical note: Q-Learning. Mach Learn 8:279–292

    Google Scholar 

  17. Foufoula-Georgiou E (1991) Convex interpolation for gradient dynamic-programming. Water Resour Res 27(1):31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson SA, Stedinger JR, Shoemaker CA, Li Y, Tejada-Guibert JA (1993) Numerical-solution of continuous-state dynamic programs using linear and spline interpolation. Oper Res 41(3):484–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K-water (2003) Geum river basin operational guidelines for MODSIM, technical report. Korea Water Resources Corporation, Daejeon

    Google Scholar 

  20. AMSA (1994) Approaches to combined sewer overflow program development. Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  21. U.S. EPA (1999) Combined sewer overflow management fact sheet. EPA/832/R-99-005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  22. McCarron J (2010) Chicago Sun Times. August 6

    Google Scholar 

  23. Water News Update (2010) Clean Water Council. http://waternewsupdaate.com, December 29

  24. Loucks ED, Locke EF, Heinz SR, Vitasovic ZC (2004) A real-time control strategy for operating the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) conveyance and storage system. Proceedings of the 2004 World Water and Environmental Resources Congress: Critical Transitions in Water and Environmental Resources Management, Environmental and Water Resources Institute and American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pleau M, Colas H, Lavallée P, Pelletier G, Bonin R (2005) Global optimal real-time control of the Quebec urban drainage system. Environ Model Software 20:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vazquez J, François M, Gilbert D (2003) Real-time management of a sewage system: verification of the optimality and applicability of graphical linear programming compared to mixed linear programming. J Water Sci 16(4):425–442, article in French

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weyand M (2002) Real-time control in combined sewer systems in Germany–some case studies. Urban Water 4:347–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schutze M, Campisano A, Colas H, Schilling W, Vanrolleghem PA (2004) Real-time control of urban wastewater systems–Where do we stand today? J Hydrol 299(3):335–348

    Google Scholar 

  29. Labadie JW (1993) Optimal use of in-line storage for real-time urban stormwater control. In: Cao C, Yen BC, Benedini M (eds) Urban storm drainage. Water Resources Publications, Inc, Highlands Ranch, CO

    Google Scholar 

  30. Darsono S, Labadie JW (2007) Neural optimal control algorithm for real-time regulation of in-line storage in combined sewer systems. Environ Model Software 22:1349–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kayhanian M, Stenstrom MK (2005) First flush pollutant mass loading: Treatment strategies. Trans ResRecord (Hydrology, Hydraulics, and Water Quality), No. 1904, 133–143

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huber WC, Dickinson RE (1992) Stormwater management model. Version 4: User’s Manual, EPA/600/3-88-001a, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Georgia, USA. October

    Google Scholar 

  33. Griva I, Nash SG, Sofer A (2010) Linear and nonlinear optimization. SIAM, Pennsylvania, PA

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen Y-H, Chai S-Y (1991) UNSTDY: combined sewer model user’s manual. Chen Engineering Technology, Inc, Ft. Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  35. Unver OL, Mays LW (1990) Model for real-time optimal flood control operation of a reservoir system. Water Res Manage 4:21–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parisini T, Zoppoli R (1994) Neural networks for feedback feed-forward nonlinear control systems. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(3):436–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Haykin S (1994) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. IEEE Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Freeman J (1994) Simulating neural networks with mathematica. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Inc, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hassoum M (1995) Fundamentals of artificial neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  40. County K (2004) 2003–2004 Annual combined sewer overflow report. King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment Division, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  41. Masters T (1996) Practical neural network recipes in C++. Elsevier Science and Technology Books, Burlington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wilson C, Scotto L, Scarpa J, Volety A, Laramore S, Haunert D (2005) Survey of water quality, oyster reproduction and oyster health status in the St. Lucie Estuary. J Shellfish Res 24:157–165

    Google Scholar 

  43. USCOE and SFWMD (2004) Central and southern Florida project: Indian river lagoon—south: final integrated project implementation report and environmental impact statement. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District, Jacksonville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  44. Haunert D, Konyha K (2001) Establishing St. Lucie Estuary Watershed Inflow Targets to enhance Mesohaline Biota, Appendix E., Indian River Lagoon—South Feasibility Study, South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wan Y, Labadie J, Konya K, Conboy T (2006) Optimization of frequency distribution of freshwater inflows for coastal ecosystem restoration. J Water Resour Plann Manage 132(5):320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bárdossy A, Duckstein L (1995) Fuzzy rule-based modeling with applications to geophysical, biological, and engineering systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zimmermann H (2001) Fuzzy Set theory and its applications. Kluwer, Boston, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Holland J (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial system. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  49. Goldberg D (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  50. Michalewicz Z (1996) Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  51. Sareni B, Krähenbühl L (1998) Fitness sharing and niching methods revisited. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 2(3):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bicknell B, Imhoff J, Kittle J, Jobes T, Donigan A (2001) Hydrologic simulation program-FORTRAN, version 12, user’s manual, national exposure research laboratory, office of research and development. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA

    Google Scholar 

  53. Aqua Terra Consultants (1996) Modifications to HSPF for high water table and Wetlands conditions in South Florida. Report submitted to South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  54. Smajstrla AG (1990) Agricultural field scale irrigation requirements simulation (AFSIRS) model, version 5.5. Technical manual. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hu G (1999) Two-dimensional hydrodynamic model of St. Lucie estuary. Proceedings of the ASCE-CSCE national conference on environmental engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Labadie, J.W. (2014). Advances in Water Resources Systems Engineering: Applications of Machine Learning. In: Wang, L., Yang, C. (eds) Modern Water Resources Engineering. Handbook of Environmental Engineering, vol 15. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-594-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-595-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics