Skip to main content

History of PPAR Discovery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors

Abstract

Using electron microscopy, microbodies were first discovered in 1954 in mouse renal cells by Rhodin (Afzelius 1965). Later in 1966, De Duve and Baudhuin were the first to isolate these organelles from rat liver and, based on biochemical studies, termed them peroxisomes (Schrader and Fahimi 2008). Peroxisomes were later found in all eukaryotic cells with the exception of mature erythrocytes and sperms (Schrader and Fahimi 2008; Fidaleo 2010). Although all peroxisomes have common metabolic pathways, unique cell- and/or tissue-specific peroxisomal functions may also exist. Future discovery of various peroxisomal marker proteins as well as more sensitive detection techniques such as mass spectrometry-based proteomics should provide insights toward better understanding of peroxisomal functions in different tissues and species (Islinger et al. 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afzelius BA (1965) The occurrence and structure of microbodies: a comparative study. J Cell Biol 26:835–843

    Google Scholar 

  • Baes M, Aubourg P (2009) Peroxisomes, myelination and axonal integrity in the CNS. Neuroscientist 15:367–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman NE, Moser AB, Steinberg SJ (2010) Rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata type 1. In: Pagon RA, Bird TC, Dolan CR, Stephens K, eds

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter-Mackie MB, White CT, Hurley RM, Chew BH, Lange D (2011) Primary hyperoxaluria type 1. In: Pagon RA, Bird TD, Dolan CR, Stephens K, Adam MP (eds) GeneReviews™ [Internet]. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 1993–2002. Jun 19 [updated 2011 Nov 17]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdinandusse S, Denis S, Clayton PT, Graham A, Rees JE, Allen JT, McLean BN, Brown AY, Vreken P, Waterham HR, Wanders RJ (2000) Mutations in the gene encoding peroxisomal alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase cause adult-onset sensory motor neuropathy. Nat Genet 24:188–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidaleo M (2010) Peroxisomes and peroxisomal disorders: the main facts. Exp Toxicol Pathol 62:615–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxworthy PS, White SL, Hoover DM, Eacho PL (1990) Effect of ciprofibrate, bezafibrate and LY171883 on peroxisomal beta-oxidation in cultured rat, dog and rhesus monkey hepatocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 104:386–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Góth L, Rass P, Páy A (2004) Catalase enzyme mutations and their association with diseases. Mol Diagn 8:141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara-Kuge S, Fujiki Y (2008) The peroxin Pex14p is involved in LC3-dependent degradation of mammalian peroxisomes. Exp Cell Res 314:3531–3541

    Google Scholar 

  • Huybrechts S, Van Veldhoven P, Brees C, Mannaerts GP, Los GV, Fransen M (2009) Peroxisome dynamics in cultured mammalian cells. Traffic 10:1722–1733

    Google Scholar 

  • Islinger M, Cardoso MJR, Schrader M (2010) Be different, the diversity of peroxisomes in the animal kingdom. Biochim Biophys Acta 1803:881–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Islinger M, Grille S, Fahimi HD, Schrader M (2012) The peroxisome: an update on mysteries. Histochem Cell Biol 137:547–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JM, Morrell JC, Gould SJ (2004) PEX19 is a predominantly cytosolic chaperone and import receptor for class 1 peroxisomal membrane proteins. J Cell Biol 164:57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake BG, Gray TJ (1985) Species differences in hepatic peroxisome proliferation. Biochem Soc Trans 13:859–861

    Google Scholar 

  • McNew JA, Goodman JM (1994) An oligomeric protein is imported into peroxisomes in vivo. J Cell Biol 127:1245–1257

    Google Scholar 

  • McNew JA, Goodman JM (1996) The targeting and assembly of peroxisomal proteins: some old rules do not apply. Trends Biochem Sci 21:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukaiyama H, Baba M, Osumi M, Aoyagi S, Kato N, Ohsumi Y, Sakai Y (2004) Modification of a ubiquitin-like protein Paz2 conducted micropexophagy through formation of a novel membrane structure. Mol Biol Cell 15:58–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Poll-The BT, Gärtner J (2012) Clinical diagnosis, biochemical findings and MRI spectrum of peroxisomal disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta 1822:1421–1429

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy JK, Krishnakantha TP (1975) Hepatic peroxisome proliferation: induction by two novel compounds structurally unrelated to clofibrate. Science 190:787–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Richert L, Price S, Chesne C, Maita K, Carmichael N (1996) Comparison of induction of hepatic peroxisome proliferation by the herbicide oxadiazon in vivo in rats, mice and dogs and in vitro in rat and human hepatocytes. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 141:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucktäschel R, Halbach A, Girzalsky W, Rottensteiner H, Erdmann R (2010) De novo synthesis of peroxisomes upon mitochondrial targeting of Pex3p. Eur J Cell Biol 89:947–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucktäschel R, Girzalsky W, Erdmann R (2011) Protein import machineries of peroxisomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1808:892–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader M, Fahimi HD (2008) The peroxisome: still a mysterious organelle. Histochem Cell Biol 129:421–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg SJ, Dodt G, Raymond GV, Braverman NE, Moser AB, Moser HW (2006) Peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763:1733–1748

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoms S, Gärtner J (2012) First PEX11β patient extends spectrum of peroxisomal biogenesis disorder phenotypes. J Med Genet 49:314–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Till A, Lakhani R, Burnett SF, Subramani S (2012) Pexophagy: the selective degradation of peroxisomes. Int J Cell Biol 2012:512721

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanders RJ, Waterham HR (2005) Peroxisomal disorders I: biochemistry and genetics of peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Clin Genet 67:107–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanders RJ, Ferdinandusse S, Brites P, Kemp S (2010) Peroxisomes, lipid metabolism and lipotoxicity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1801:272–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanders RJ, Komen J, Kemp S (2011) Fatty acid omega-oxidation as a rescue pathway for fatty acid oxidation disorders in humans. FEBS J 278:182–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller S, Gould SJ, Valle D (2003) Peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 4:165–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokota S (2003) Degradation of normal and proliferated peroxisomes in rat hepatocytes: regulation of peroxisomes quantity in cells. Microsc Res Tech 61:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokota S, Fahimi HD (2009) Degradation of excess peroxisomes in mammalian liver cells by autophagy and other mechanisms. Histochem Cell Biol 131:455–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutphen T, Veenhuis M, van der Klei I (2008) Pex14 is the sole component of the peroxisomal translocon that is required for pexophagy. Autophagy 4:63–66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Youssef, J.A., Badr, M.Z. (2013). History of PPAR Discovery. In: Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-420-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics