Skip to main content

History of Ureteroscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Urology ((CCU))

Abstract

Technology is the application of science, engineering to producing products or devices that improve upon mankind’s existence. Ureteroscopy has rapidly evolved to become one of the most common procedures performed by the urologist in his/her everyday work life and represents one of urology’s remarkable technologies [Bratslavsky and Moran (Urol Clin NA 31(1):181–187, 2004)]. To fully comprehend ureteroscopy and the urologic applications that will be presented in this textbook, looking backwards in time is essential. The history of this technology is fascinating in its own right and demonstrates the rapidity of impact that the technology can have upon the profession of urology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bratslavsky G, Moran ME. Current trends in ureteroscopy. Urol Clin NA. 2004;31(1):181–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bragg W. The Universe of Light. New York: Macmillan Co; 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hecht J. In City of Lights: the story of fiber optics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kelly, Howard A, Curtis F. Burnam. Diseases of the Kidneys. New York: Ureters and Bladder. D Appleton and Co.; (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly HA. On a method of post-mortem examination of thoracic and abdominal viscera through vagina, perineum, and rectum, and without incision of the abdominal parietes. The Medical News. 1883;26:733–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Institute of Medicine. Assessing medical technologies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moran ME. Advances in ureteroscopy. Urol Cl NA. 2003;31:xv–xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lang P. Candles to computers: the story of minimally invasive procedures. UWOMJ. 2011;80(1):34–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Figdor PP. Philip Bozzini: The Beginnings of Modern Endoscopy. Tuttlingen: Verlag Endo-Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Colladon D. On the reflections of a ray of light inside a parabolic liquid stream. Comptes Rendus. 1842; 15:800.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Desmoreaux AJ. The endoscope and its application to the diagnosis and treatment of affections of the genitourinary passages. Chicago Med J. 1867;24:177–94.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halsted TH. Esophagoscopy, and bronchoscopy, with reports of six cases. NY State J Med. 1908;8(7): 869–74.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stutt RG. Charles Vernon Boys (1855–1944). Obit Notice Fellows Roy Soc. 1944;4(13):771–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sircus W, Flisk E, Craigs Z. Milestones in the evolution of endoscopy: a short history. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2003;33:124–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schollmeyer T, Soyinka AS, Schollmeyer M, Meinhold-Heerlein I. Gerog Kelling (1866–1945): the root of modern day minimal invasive surgery. A forgotten legend? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;276(5):505–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zollner F. Gustave Killian, father of bronchoscopy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1965;82(6):656–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nitze M. Eine neue Beleuchtungs und Untersuchungs method fur Harnrohre, Harnblase, und Rektum. Wiener Med Wochen. 1879;24:649.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reuter MA, Reuter HJ. The development of the cystoscope. J Urol. 1998;159:638–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moran ME. The light bulb, cystoscopy and Thomas Alva Edison. J Endourol. 2010;24(9):1395–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Musehold A. Stroboskopische und Photographische Studien. Ann des Mal du Larynx Jan. 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nitze MCF. Kystophotograpischer Atlas. Wiesbaden: JF Bergmann; 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brittain JE. Scanning the past. Proc IEEE 1996;84(4).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Henning N, Keilhack H. Die gezielte Farben photographie in der Magenhohle. Deutsche Med Wschr. 1938;64:1392–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. vanHeel ACS. A method of transporting optical images without aberrations. Nature. 1954;173:39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hopkins HH, Kapany NS. A flexible fiberscope, using static scanning. Nature. 1954;173:39–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirschowitz BI. A personal history of the fiberscope. Gastroenterology. 1970;36:864–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kieser CW. Introduction of cold light endoscopy. Akt Urol. 2008;39(2):130–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Epstein M. Endoscopy: developments in optical instrumentation. Science. 1980;210(4467):280–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bagley DH. Ureteroscopic surgery: changing times and perspectives. Urol Cl NA. 2004;30(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnston III WK, Low RK, Das S. The evolution and progress of ureteroscopy. Urol Cl NA. 2004;31(1):5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bozzini P. Lichtlieter, eine Enfindung zur Auschschauung innere Theiler und Krankheiten. J der Practischen Arzneykunde und Wunderartzney kunst. 1806;24:107–24.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Segalas PR. Un moyen d’eclairer ‘uretre et la vessie de maniere a voir dans l’interieur de ces organs. Revue Medicale Francaise et de L’etrangere. 1827;1:157–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fisher J. Instruments for illuminating dark cavities. Phil J Med. 1827;14:409.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Desmormeaux AJ. De l’Endoscopie, instrument proper a’ ec lairer certaines cavities interieures de l’economie. Compte rendus de L’Academie des Sciences. 1855;40:692–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bruck J. Das Urethroscop und Stomatoscop Durch Galvanisches Gluhlict. Breslau: Marushke and Berendt; 1867.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Killian G. Zur Geschicnte der Oesophago und Gastroskopie. Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Chirirgie. 1900;59:499–512.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nitze M. Beitrage zur Endosckopie der mannlichen Hamblase. Arch fur Klinishce Chirurgie. 1881;36: 661–732.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Newell OK. The endoscopic instruments of Joseph Leiter of Vienna and the present development of endoscopy. Boston Med. 1887;117:528–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Young HH, McKay RW. Congenital valvular obstruction of the prostatic urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1929;48:509.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Goodman T. Ureteroscopy with pediatric cystoscope in adults. Urology. 1977;9(4):394.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lyon ES, Kyker JS, Schoenberg HW. Tranurethral ureteroscopy in women: a ready addition to the urological armamentarium. J Urol. 1978;119:35–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lyon ES. The birth of modern ureteroscopy: the Albona Jaybis story. J Endourol. 2004;18(6):525–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Perez-Castro EE, Martinez-Piniero JA. Transurethral ureteroscopy- a current urological procedure. Arch Esp Urol. 1980;33(5):445–60.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Marshall VF. Fiber optics in urology. J Urol. 1964;91:110–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Takagi T, Go T, Takayasu H, Aso Y. A small-caliber fiberscope for visualization of urinary tract, biliary tract, and spinal canal. Surgery. 1968;64:1033.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Takagi T, Go T, Takayasu H, Aso Y. Fiberoptic pyeloureteroscopy. Surgery. 1971;70:661.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Takayasu H, Aso Y. Recent development for pyeloureteroscopy: guide tube method for tis introduction into the ureter. J Urol. 1974;112:176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Vilardell F. Digestive endoscopy in the second millennium. Thieme, Madrid: From Lichleiter to endoscopy; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Das S. Transureteral ureteroscopy and stone manipulation under direct vision. J Urol. 1981;125:112–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Lyon ES. Treatment of distal ureteral calculi using rigid ureteroscope. Urology. 1982;20(6):574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Huffman JL, Bagley DH, Lyon ES. Extending cystoscopic techniques into the ureter and renal pelvis: experience with ureteroscopy and pyeloscopy. JAMA. 1983;250:2002–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Goodfiend R. Ultrasonic and electrohydraulic ­lithotripsy of ureteral calculi. Urology. 1984;23:5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dretler SP, Watson G, Parrish JA, Murray S. Pulsed dye laser fragmentation of ureteral calculi: initial clinical experience. J Urol. 1987;137:386–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Webb DR, Kockelburgh R, Johnson WF. The VersaPpulse holmium surgical laser in clinical urology: a pilot study. Minim Invasive Ther. 1993;2: 23–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Fritzsche P, Moorhead JD, Axford PD, Torrey RR. Urologic applications of andiographic guide wire and catheter techniques. J Urol. 1981;125(6):774–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Newman RC, Hunter PT, Hawkins IF, Finlayson B. A general ureteral dilator-sheathing system. Urology. 1985;25(3):287–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL. Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol. 1967;97(5): 840–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Gibbons RP, Correa RJJ, Cummings KB, Mason JT. Experience with indwelling ureteral stent catheters. J Urol. 1976;115:22–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Finney RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. J Urol. 2002;167(2 Pt 2):1135–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Basillote JB, Lee DI, Eichel L, Clayman RV. Ureteroscopes: flexible, rigid, and semirigid. Urol Cl NA. 2004;31(1):21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Marberger M. “Needle” ureteroscopes- where are the limits of miniaturization [abstract]. J Endourol. 1992;1–2:46.

    Google Scholar 

  62. White MD, Moran ME. Fatigability of the latest generation ureteropyeloscopes [abstract]. J Endourol. 1998;12:S182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Natalin RA, Landman J. Where next for the endoscope? Nat Rev Urol. 2009;6(11):622–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Moran ME. The history of robotic surgery. In: Hemal AK, Menon M, editors. Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery. London: Springer; 2011. p. 3–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. Moran M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moran, M.E. (2013). History of Ureteroscopy. In: Monga, M. (eds) Ureteroscopy. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-206-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-62703-205-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-62703-206-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics