Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contemporary Medical Imaging ((CMI,volume 1))

Abstract

This chapter presents endovascular strategies for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, including embolization (e.g., coiling or Onyx infusion), flow diversion, and parent vessel sacrifice. Techniques are discussed in detail, and complications are covered. A primer on imaging of intracranial aneurysms is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Khan J, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms by using Guglielmi detachable coils in awake patients: safety and feasibility. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:880–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogilvy CS, Yang X, Jamil OA, et al. Neurointerventional procedures for unruptured intracranial aneurysms under procedural sedation and local anesthesia: a large-volume, single-center experience. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:120–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Qureshi AI, Luft AR, Sharma M, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: part II – clinical aspects and recommendations. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:1360–75; discussion 75–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Qureshi AI, Luft AR, Sharma M, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: part I – pathophysiological and pharmacological features. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:1344–59.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang G, Jung C, Park SQ, et al. Thromboembolic complications of elective coil embolization of unruptured aneurysms: the effect of oral antiplatelet preparation on periprocedural thromboembolic complication. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:743–8; discussion 8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwon BJ, Im SH, Park JC, et al. Shaping and navigating methods of microcatheters for endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:34–40; discussion 40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Matsumoto S, et al. Shapability, memory, and luminal changes in microcatheters after steam shaping: a comparison of 11 different microcatheters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2610–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murayama Y, Tateshima S, Gonzalez NR, Vinuela F. Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing of intracranial aneurysms: long-term experimental study. Stroke. 2003;34:2031–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ, Sandhu JS, Akkawi N, Schenck AE, Linfante I. Complex-shaped platinum coils for brain aneurysms: higher packing density, improved biomechanical stability, and midterm angiographic outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1395–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Quasar Grunwald I, Molyneux A, Kuhn AL, Watson D, Byrne JV. Influence of coil geometry on intra-aneurysmal packing density: evaluation of a new primary wind technology. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2010;44:289–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kallmes DF, Fujiwara NH. New expandable hydrogel-platinum coil hybrid device for aneurysm embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1580–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Slob MJ, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M. Coil thickness and packing of cerebral aneurysms: a comparative study of two types of coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:901–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawanabe Y, Sadato A, Taki W, Hashimoto N. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: correlation between coil packing density and coil compaction. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143:451–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Slob MJ, Bescos JO, Slump CH, Wijnalda D. Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology. 2004;231:653–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slob MJ, Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ. The relation between packing and reopening in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:942–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morales HG, Kim M, Vivas EE, et al. How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(10):1935–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Agostino SJ, Harrigan MR, Chalela JA, et al. Clinical experience with Matrix2 360 degrees coils in the treatment of 100 intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2009;72:41–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyers PM, Lavine SD, Fitzsimmons BF, et al. Chemical meningitis after cerebral aneurysm treatment using two second-generation aneurysm coils: report of two cases. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:1222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brisman JL, Song JK, Niimi Y, Berenstein A. Treatment options for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using a self-expandable hydrophilic coil and a self-expandable stent combination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1237–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lubicz B, Lefranc F, Levivier M, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with a branch arising from the sac. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:142–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwee TC, Kwee RM. MR angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 2007;49:703–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sprengers ME, Schaafsma JD, van Rooij WJ, et al. Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1665–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Agid R, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, Terbrugge KG, Farb RI. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1570–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schaafsma JDMD, Koffijberg HP, Buskens EMDP, Velthuis BKMDP, van der Graaf YMDP, Rinkel GJEMD. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography to follow-up patients with coiled intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41:1736–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kovacs A, Moehlenbruch M, Hadizadeh DR, Seifert M, Willinek WA, Greschus S, Flacke S, Clusmann H, Urbach H. Non-invasive imaging after stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3T-MRI and 64-MDCT. In: European Society of Radiology. Vienna, Austria; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pierot L, Barbe C, Spelle L, investigators A. Endovascular treatment of very small unruptured aneurysms: rate of procedural complications, clinical outcome, and anatomical results. Stroke. 2010;41:2855–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brinjikji WBS, Lanzino GMD, Cloft HJMDP, Rabinstein AMD, Kallmes DFMD. Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2010;41:116–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lum C, Narayanam SB, Silva L, et al. Outcome in small aneurysms (<4 mm) treated by endovascular coiling. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4(3):196–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goddard JK, Moran CJ, Cross 3rd DT, Derdeyn CP. Absent relationship between the coil-embolization ratio in small aneurysms treated with a single detachable coil and outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:1916–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kirmani JF, Paolucci U. Ascent: a novel balloon microcatheter device used as the primary coiling microcatheter of a basilar tip aneurysm. J Neuroimaging. 2012;22(2):191–3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Modi J, Eesa M, Menon BK, Wong JH, Goyal M. Balloon-assisted rapid intermittent sequential coiling (BRISC) technique for the treatment of complex wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2011;17:64–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Phatouros CC, Halbach VV, Malek AM, Dowd CF, Higashida RT. Simultaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage and carotid cavernous fistula after rupture of a paraclinoid aneurysm during balloon-assisted coil embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:1100–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Spiotta AM, Bhalla T, Hussain MS, et al. An analysis of inflation times during balloon-assisted aneurysm coil embolization and ischemic complications. Stroke. 2011;42:1051–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cekirge HS, Yavuz K, Geyik S, Saatci I. HyperForm balloon remodeling in the endovascular treatment of anterior cerebral, middle cerebral, and anterior communicating artery aneurysms: clinical and angiographic follow-up results in 800 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:944–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lawson MF, Newman WC, Chi YY, Mocco JD, Hoh BL. Stent-associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2011;69:598–604.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hwang G, Park H, Bang JS, et al. Comparison of 2-year angiographic outcomes of stent- and nonstent-assisted coil embolization in unruptured aneurysms with an unfavorable configuration for coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(9):1707–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tumialán LM, Zhang YJ, Cawley CM, Dion JE, Tong FC, Barrow DL. Intracranial hemorrhage associated with stent-assisted coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a cautionary report. J Neurosurg. 2008;108:1122–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim DJ, Suh SH, Kim BM, Kim DI, Huh SK, Lee JW. Hemorrhagic complications related to the stent-remodeled coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:73–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kung DK, Policeni BA, Capuano AW, et al. Risk of ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage in patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms treated using stent-assisted coiling. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:1021–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lubicz B, Francois O, Levivier M, Brotchi J, Baleriaux D. Preliminary experience with the enterprise stent for endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: potential advantages and limiting characteristics. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1063–9; discussion 9–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lavine SD, Meyers PM, Connolly ES, Solomon RS. Spontaneous delayed proximal migration of enterprise stent after staged treatment of wide-necked basilar aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:E1012; discussion E.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Perez-Arjona E, Fessler RD. Basilar artery to bilateral posterior cerebral artery ‘Y stenting’ for endovascular reconstruction of wide-necked basilar apex aneurysms: report of three cases. Neurol Res. 2004;26:276–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bain M, Hussain MS, Spiotta A, Gonugunta V, Moskowitz S, Gupta R. “Double-barrel” stent reconstruction of a symptomatic fusiform basilar artery aneurysm: case report. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:E1491–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Codman neurovascular. Instructions for use. codman enterprise vascular reconstuction device and delivery system. Codman and Shurtleff, Inc. Raynham, MA 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Heller RS, Malek AM. Parent vessel size and curvature strongly influence risk of incomplete stent apposition in enterprise intracranial aneurysm stent coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(9):1714–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hong B, Patel NV, Gounis MJ, et al. Semi-jailing technique for coil embollization of complex, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:1131–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Baxter BW, Rosso D, Lownie SP. Double microcatheter technique for detachable coil treatment of large, wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1176–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Terada T, Tsuura M, Matsumoto H, et al. Endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;94:87–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Henkes H, Fischer S, Weber W, et al. Endovascular coil occlusion of 1811 intracranial aneurysms: early angiographic and clinical results. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:268–80; discussion 80–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, et al. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke. 2010;41:2247–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tan H-Q, Li M-H, Zhang P-L, et al. Reconstructive endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Willis covered stent: medium-term clinical and angiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:1014–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Li MH, Li YD, Tan HQ, Luo QY, Cheng YS. Treatment of distal internal carotid artery aneurysm with the willis covered stent: a prospective pilot study. Radiology. 2009;253:470–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, van Rooij WJ, Algra A. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke. 1999;30:470–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lozier AP, Connolly Jr ES, Lavine SD, Solomon RA. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke. 2002;33:2509–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience. J Neurosurg. 2003;98:959–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Singh V, Gress DR, Higashida RT, Dowd CF, Halbach VV, Johnston SC. The learning curve for coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:768–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. McDougall CG, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Larsen DW, Hieshima GB. Causes and management of aneurysmal hemorrhage occurring during embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:87–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Cerebral aneurysm perforations complicating therapy with guglielmi detachable coils: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1706–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ricolfi F, Le Guerinel C, Blustajn J, et al. Rupture during treatment of recently ruptured aneurysms with Guglielmi electrodetachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1653–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Doerfler A, Wanke I, Egelhof T, et al. Aneurysmal rupture during embolization with guglielmi detachable coils: causes, management, and outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1825–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Sluzewski M, Bosch JA, van Rooij WJ, Nijssen PC, Wijnalda D. Rupture of intracranial aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: incidence, outcome, and risk factors. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:238–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Willinsky R, terBrugge K. Use of a second microcatheter in the management of a perforation during endovascular treatment of a cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1537–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Farhat HI, Elhammady MS, Aziz-Sultan MA. N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate use in intraoperative ruptured aneurysms as a salvage rescue: case report. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:E216–7.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Soeda A, Sakai N, Sakai H, et al. Thromboembolic events associated with guglielmi detachable coil embolization of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysms: evaluation of 66 consecutive cases with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:127–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:1–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:475–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Pelz DM, Lownie SP, Fox AJ. Thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1541–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Workman MJ, Cloft HJ, Tong FC, et al. Thrombus formation at the neck of cerebral aneurysms during treatment with guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1568–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Soeda A, Sakai N, Murao K, et al. Thromboembolic events associated with guglielmi detachable coil embolization with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Part II. Detection of the microemboli proximal to cerebral aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:2035–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Derdeyn CP, Cross 3rd DT, Moran CJ, et al. Postprocedure ischemic events after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:837–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ross IB, Dhillon GS. Complications of endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2005;64:12–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kanaan H, Jankowitz B, Aleu A, et al. In-stent thrombosis and stenosis after neck-remodeling device-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:1523–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Rordorf G, Bellon RJ, Budzik Jr RF, et al. Silent thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms by use of guglielmi detachable coils: prospective study applying diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:5–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Bendok BR, Hanel RA, Hopkins LN. Coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:1125–30; discussion 30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Ng PP, Phatouros CC, Khangure MS. Use of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitor for a thromboembolic complication during guglielmi detachable coil treatment of an acutely ruptured aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1761–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Steinhubl SR, Talley JD, Braden GA, et al. Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study. Circulation. 2001;103:2572–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Quinn MJ, Plow EF, Topol EJ. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: recognition of a two-edged sword? Circulation. 2002;106:379–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Kleinman N. Assessing platelet function in clinical trials. In: Quinn M, Fitzgerald D, editors. Platelet function assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Totowa: Humana Press; 2005. p. 369–84.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Fourie P, Duncan IC. Microsnare-assisted mechanical removal of intraprocedural distal middle cerebral arterial thromboembolism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:630–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Cronqvist M, Pierot L, Boulin A, Cognard C, Castaings L, Moret J. Local intraarterial fibrinolysis of thromboemboli occurring during endovascular treatment of intracerebral aneurysm: a comparison of anatomic results and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:157–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Henkes H, Lowens S, Preiss H, Reinartz J, Miloslavski E, Kuhne D. A new device for endovascular coil retrieval from intracranial vessels: alligator retrieval device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:327–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Sugiu K, Martin JB, Jean B, Rufenacht DA. Rescue balloon procedure for an emergency situation during coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2002;96:373–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Cognard C, Weill A, Castaings L, Rey A, Moret J. Intracranial berry aneurysms: angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. Radiology. 1998;206:499–510.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Fessler RD, Ringer AJ, Qureshi AI, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Intracranial stent placement to trap an extruded coil during endovascular aneurysm treatment: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:248–51; discussion 51–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Deshmukh VR, McDougall CG. Monorail snare technique for the recovery of stretched platinum coils: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:E210; discussion E.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Friedman JA, Nichols DA, Meyer FB, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms: retrospective review of a 10-year single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24:526–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke. 2003;34:1398–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, Kwon OK, Kim SH. Repeat endovascular treatment in post-embolization recurrent intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:60–70; discussion 60–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bederson JB, Connolly Jr ES, Batjer HH, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40:994–1025.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. van der Wee N, Rinkel GJ, Hasan D, van Gijn J. Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage on early CT: is lumbar puncture still needed after a negative scan? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58:357–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Provenzale JM, Hacein-Bey L. CT evaluation of subarachnoid hemorrhage: a practical review for the radiologist interpreting emergency room studies. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16:441–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Hino A, Fujimoto M, Iwamoto Y, Yamaki T, Katsumori T. False localization of rupture site in patients with multiple cerebral aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:825–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Karttunen AI, Jartti PH, Ukkola VA, Sajanti J, Haapea M. Value of the quantity and distribution of subarachnoid haemorrhage on CT in the localization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;145:655–61; discussion 61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Tryfonidis M, Evans AL, Coley SC, et al. The value of radio-anatomical features on non-contrast CT scans in localizing the source in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Clin Anat. 2007;20:618–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery. 1980;6:1–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Pasqualin A, Bazzan A, Cavazzani P, Scienza R, Licata C, Da Pian R. Intracranial hematomas following aneurysmal rupture: experience with 309 cases. Surg Neurol. 1986;25:6–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Thai QA, Raza SM, Pradilla G, Tamargo RJ. Aneurysmal rupture without subarachnoid hemorrhage: case series and literature review. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:225–9; discussion 225–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Flint AC, Roebken A, Singh V. Primary intraventricular hemorrhage: yield of diagnostic angiography and clinical outcome. Neurocrit Care. 2008;8:330–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Kallmes DF, Layton K, Marx WF, Tong F. Death by nondiagnosis: why emergent CT angiography should not be done for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1837–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Moran CJ. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: DSA versus CT angiography – is the answer available? Radiology. 2011;258:15–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Fifi JT, Meyers PM, Lavine SD, et al. Complications of modern diagnostic cerebral angiography in an academic medical center. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:442–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Prestigiacomo CJ, Sabit A, He W, Jethwa P, Gandhi C, Russin J. Three dimensional CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in the detection of intracranial aneurysms in subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2:385–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Menke J, Larsen J, Kallenberg K. Diagnosing cerebral aneurysms by computed tomographic angiography: meta-analysis. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:646–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Bruneau M, Rynkowski M, Smida-Rynkowska K, Brotchi J, De Witte O, Lubicz B. Long-term follow-up survey reveals a high yield, up to 30% of patients presenting newly detected aneurysms more than 10 years after ruptured intracranial aneurysms clipping. Neurosurg Rev. 2011;34:485–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, Fiorella D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part II: CT angiographic follow-up of surgically clipped aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1207–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Sagara Y, Kiyosue H, Hori Y, Sainoo M, Nagatomi H, Mori H. Limitations of three-dimensional reconstructed computerized tomography angiography after clip placement for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:656–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. van der Schaaf IC, Velthuis BK, Wermer MJ, et al. Multislice computed tomography angiography screening for new aneurysms in patients with previously clip-treated intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, positive predictive value, and interobserver agreement. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:682–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Dehdashti AR, Binaghi S, Uske A, Regli L. Comparison of multislice computerized tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the postoperative evaluation of patients with clipped aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2006;104:395–403.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Chen W, Yang Y, Qiu J, Peng Y, Xing W. Sixteen-row multislice computerized tomography angiography in the postoperative evaluation of patients with intracranial aneurysms. Br J Neurosurg. 2008;22:63–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Thines L, Dehdashti AR, Howard P, et al. Postoperative assessment of clipped aneurysms with 64-slice computerized tomography angiography. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:844–53; discussion 53–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Tomura N, Sakuma I, Otani T, et al. Evaluation of postoperative status after clipping surgery in patients with cerebral aneurysm on 3-dimensional-CT angiography with elimination of clips. J Neuroimaging. 2011;21:10–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, Fiorella D. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1001–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Khan R, Wallace RC, Fiorella DJ. Magnetic resonance angiographic imaging follow-up of treated intracranial aneurysms. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;19:231–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Kaufmann 3rd TJ, Huston J, Cloft HJ, et al. A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:912–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Lubicz B, Levivier M, Sadeghi N, Emonts P, Baleriaux D. Immediate intracranial aneurysm occlusion after embolization with detachable coils: a comparison between MR angiography and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neuroradiol. 2007;34:190–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Ferre JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:365–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Cure’ JK. Brain MRA protocol for coiled aneurysms. Birmingham; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Raabe A, Beck J, Gerlach R, Zimmermann M, Seifert V. Near-infrared indocyanine green video angiography: a new method for intraoperative assessment of vascular flow. Neurosurgery. 2003;52:132–9; discussion 9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Hanggi D, Etminan N, Steiger HJ. The impact of microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography on surgery of arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:1094–103; discussion 103–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Schuette AJ, Cawley CM, Barrow DL. Indocyanine green videoangiography in the management of dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:658–62; discussion 62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Awano T, Sakatani K, Yokose N, et al. Intraoperative EC-IC bypass blood flow assessment with indocyanine green angiography in moyamoya and non-moyamoya ischemic stroke. World Neurosurg. 2010;73:668–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Woitzik J, Pena-Tapia PG, Schneider UC, Vajkoczy P, Thome C. Cortical perfusion measurement by indocyanine-green videoangiography in patients undergoing hemicraniectomy for malignant stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1549–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Ferroli P, Acerbi F, Albanese E, et al. Application of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for CNS tumors: results on the first 100 cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;109:251–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Kim EH, Cho JM, Chang JH, Kim SH, Lee KS. Application of intraoperative indocyanine green videoangiography to brain tumor surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011;153:1487–95; discussion 94–5.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Killory BD, Nakaji P, Maughan PH, Wait SD, Spetzler RF. Evaluation of angiographically occult spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae with surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green angiography: report of 3 cases. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:781–7; discussion 7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Trinh VT, Duckworth EA. Surgical excision of filum terminale arteriovenous fistulae after lumbar fusion: value of indocyanine green and theory on origins (a technical note and report of two cases). Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Oh JK, Shin HC, Kim TY, et al. Intraoperative indocyanine green video-angiography: spinal dural arteriovenous fistula. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(24):E1578–80.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Chen SF, Kato Y, Oda J, et al. The application of intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green videoangiography and analysis of fluorescence intensity in cerebrovascular surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Hope-Ross M, Yannuzzi LA, Gragoudas ES, et al. Adverse reactions due to indocyanine green. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:529–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Raabe A, Beck J, Seifert V. Technique and image quality of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography during aneurysm surgery using surgical microscope integrated near-infrared video technology. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2005;66:1–6; discussion 7–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix: Primer on Imaging of Intracranial Aneurysms by Joel K. Curé, M.D.

Appendix: Primer on Imaging of Intracranial Aneurysms by Joel K. Curé, M.D.

Imaging techniques for intracranial aneurysms include CTA, MRA, catheter angiography and indocyanine green videoangiography. Evaluation of suspected aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage typically begins with non-contrast computed tomography.

1.1 Computed Tomography

Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is the first-line imaging modality for patients suspected of having an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The most common diagnostic error leading to failure to correctly diagnose SAH is failure to obtain a non-contrast brain CT.89 Using xanthochromia on lumbar puncture as the gold standard, CT performed on a third generation scanner was 98% sensitive for detecting SAH within 12 h of symptom onset.90 The sensitivity of CT for SAH decreases with time after the hemorrhage and with small-volume hemorrhages.91 The most common cause of rebleeding soon after aneurysm surgery is failure to obliterate the offending aneurysm, and this in turn is most commonly due to failure to identify the aneurysm at angiography.92 The thickness and distribution of the intracranial hemorrhage and aneurysm contour are useful in predicting the site of the offending aneurysm on subsequent angiography.93,94 The amount of subarachnoid blood on CT (Fisher scale) correlates with the risk of vasospasm.95 While most aneurysm ruptures produce subarachnoid hemorrhage, aneurysms that have become adherent to the brain surface may produce both subarachnoid and intraparenchymal hemorrhage,96 entirely intraparenchymal hemorrhage,97 or more rarely primarily intraventricular hemorrhage.98 CT in a substantial number of patients with non-aneurysmal SAH demonstrates a characteristic pattern of SAH surrounding the midbrain, the so-called “perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage” pattern.

1.2 Catheter Angiography

Conventional catheter digital subtraction angiography, more recently supplemented with 3D rotational angiography, is still regarded as the gold standard for imaging of intracranial aneurysms.89 It is considered by many to be the initial study of choice for evaluation of the patient with SAH, particularly in centers with 24/7 availability of a dedicated neurointerventional team.99,100 DSA provides the highest spatial resolution (0.124 mm pixel size)91 and is the optimal imaging technique for preoperative assessment of aneurysm anatomy and for evaluating morphologic features that have a direct bearing on endovascular or open surgical treatment.99 The complication rate for catheter angiography by neurointerventionalists in an academic setting has been estimated at 0.3%.101 No source of hemorrhage is identified in up to 25% of initial catheter angiograms performed for SAH. Repeat catheter angiography discovers an initially unidentified aneurysm in an additional 1–2% of cases.89

1.3 CT Angiography

CT angiography (CTA) employs a thin-slice high resolution rapidly acquired helical CT scan of the brain during the rapid intravenous infusion (“bolus”) of 80–120 cc of iodinated contrast material. Imaging is performed during peak arterial opacification, ideally before significant venous opacification occurs. Sub-millimeter thickness slices can be achieved on modern multi-detector CT scanners with a maximum pixel size of 0.35 mm.91 Scan time depends on the number of available detectors, but is less than 1 min for a 64 detector scanner with coverage from the foramen magnum to the vertex. Scanners with up to 320 detectors are currently available (Toshiba Aquilion One), the latter enabling whole-brain coverage with a single rotation of the CT gantry. Finally, a CTA evaluation can initiated and completed immediately upon detection of SAH on a non-contrast CT study. This can be accomplished far more quickly than a Neurointerventional team can be mobilized to complete a conventional angiogram under the best of circumstances.

The acquired images are reconstructed and available for multiplanar and 3D viewing at the CT scanner console within approximately 5 min, although network transmission via a PACS system for enterprise-wide review requires a variably longer time interval. The resulting axial source images are reviewed on a PACS viewing station. This is followed by a review of 2D maximum intensity projection (MIP) “sliding slabs” in the coronal, axial, and sagittal planes and of color 3D volume rendered images on an integrated thin client 3D workstation. Review of the source images and 2D reconstructions is particularly helpful for detecting aneurysms that are near or within bone (i.e. in or near the skull base and anterior clinoid processes). 2D reformatted and 3D volume rendered images can be generated to optimally demonstrate the relationship of the aneurysm to adjacent vascular (e.g. parent artery, adjacent perforating vessels) or osseous structures (e.g. the anterior clinoid process), but review of the “source” images is essential.

Several recent studies have supported the use of CTA as the initial imaging modality for suspected intracranial aneurysms. In a recent study of 179 patients (with 239 DSA-documented aneurysms) presenting with SAH to a single institution who underwent CTA and DSA, sensitivity of CTA was 99.6% and specificity was 100% 102 Notably, 19% of the aneurysms in this study were ≤2.9 mm. A recent meta-analysis of 45 studies comparing CTA to DSA for detection of suspected intracranial aneurysms found an overall sensitivity of 97.2% for CTA (95% CI, 95.8–98.2%). CTA specificity was 97.9% (95.7–99.0). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significantly greater sensitivity for 16 and 64 detector CT scanners than for single or 4 detector scanners, especially for smaller (≤4 mm) aneurysms. This was most likely linked to the availability of thinner (sub-millimeter) slices on the 16 and 64 detector CT scanners.103 Factors affecting the sensitivity and specificity of CTA for aneurysm detection include: aneurysm size and location, vascular tortuosity, radiologist experience, mode of image acquisition and presentation.89 CTA advantages compared to DSA include ability to demonstrate mural calcification, intraluminal thrombus, orientation of the aneurysm with respect to intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and relationship of the aneurysm to adjacent bony structures. Disadvantages include concealment of aneurysms by bony structures or aneurysm clips and decreased ability to demonstrate small vessels.89

1.4 MR Angiography

3D time of flight (3D TOF) MR angiography (MRA) is the most commonly used MR angiographic technique for imaging intracranial aneurysms. This technique is based on a T1 weighted 3D Fourier transform spoiled gradient echo MRI sequence (3D-SPGR). Here, the combined use of a short TR and small flip angle produces location-specific signal suppression in stationary tissues due to saturation. Inflowing blood that has not experienced these repeated RF pulses appears “bright” in contrast to the stationary background tissue. The individual imaging “slices” obtained in this fashion are subjected to a maximum intensity projection algorithm that creates a three dimensional angiogram. The data can also be subjected to 3D volume rendering similar to that employed in CT angiographic post-processing.

Advantages of MRA include no requirement for injected contrast (beneficial in patients with renal failure or pregnancy). Use of MR angiography may be limited by patient stability, inability to remain motionless for the study, or by contraindications to MRI, in particular implanted ferromagnetic surgical devices or pacemakers. While modern non-ferromagnetic aneurysm clips and endovascular coils are not contraindications to MRI/MRA, local field distortions and susceptibility effects produced by aneurysm clips compromise vascular analysis in the immediate region of the device as well as downstream from the device. Sensitivity of 3D TOF MRA for cerebral aneurysms ranges from 55–93%. Sensitivity is greatest with larger aneurysms, with a sensitivity of 85–100% reported for aneurysms ≥5 mm.89 Considering the many logistical barriers to MR scanning of unstable patients in the acute setting and generally higher sensitivity and spatial resolution of CTA and conventional angiography, CTA has become the primary non-invasive modality for aneurysm diagnosis at most centers.

1.5 Follow-up of Treated Aneurysms

Follow-up imaging of treated aneurysms is standard for both clipping and coiling. Imaging is necessary to ensure adequate treatment of the aneurysm, and long-term follow-up imaging has the additional advantage of identifying de novo aneurysm formation, which occurs in patients with a history of aneurysmal SAH at a rate of 1–2% per year.89,104 DSA remains the gold standard for follow-up imaging of both clipped and coiled aneurysms.105 CTA can provide adequate imaging of some previously clipped aneurysms, but beam-hardening and streak artifacts preclude effective post-coiling evaluation. MRA can provide excellent imaging of coiled aneurysms but is useless with clipped aneurysms because of artifact. The authors of this handbook use DSA for early post-operative assessment of clipped aneurysms and MRA for routine surveillance imaging of coiled aneurysms.

1.6 Follow-up of Clipped Aneurysms: CTA

Early post-treatment goals for post-clipping angiography include assessing completeness of aneurysm occlusion, ruling out arterial narrowing or occlusion by the aneurysm clip, and evaluating for possible vasospasm. Late goals of imaging in clipped aneurysms include assessing the stability of the clipped aneurysm and ruling out de novo aneurysms in other intracranial arteries.105 Susceptibility artifacts generated by aneurysm clips limit the use of MRA for evaluation of clipped aneurysms. Anatomy in the region of the clipped aneurysm and flow within arteries located “downstream” from the clip-related artifact are often impossible to visualize due to these effects. DSA or CTA is therefore required for follow-up of these patients. Recently, CTA has been assuming a larger role in post-clipping evaluation. Reports comparing CTA to DSA for detection of post-clip aneurysm residuals have yielded variable results that may reflect differences in the types of aneurysm clips employed and different MDCT systems and scanning and post-processing techniques. CTA is less useful in patients in whom multiple surgical clips have been used for reconstruction, or in patients with cobalt alloy-containing clips.106,107 Reported CTA sensitivities for aneurysm remnants have tended to be highest (100%) in studies where only titanium clips were used.108,109 A recent series of 31 consecutive patients undergoing both DSA and 64-detector CTA after aneurysm clipping with a variety of aneurysm clips (including cobalt-alloy clips) found an overall CTA sensitivity and specificity of only 50% and 100% respectively for aneurysm remnants. When only considering remnants measuring >2 mm on DSA, the sensitivity and specificity of CTA improved to 67% and 100%, respectively. The authors noted: “Conventional DSA remains the most accurate postoperative radiological examination to evaluate the quality of the clipping in every circumstance.”110 The sensitivity of CTA for evaluating vessel patency adjacent to the clipped aneurysm is also lower than that of DSA.108,110 Post-processed CTA data in which clips have been digitally “removed” with a bone removal software package improves the sensitivity of CTA for detection of postoperative aneurysm residual.111

1.7 Follow-up of Coiled Aneurysms: MRA

MRA is well-suited to for non-invasive follow up of coiled aneurysms since coil-related artifacts on MR are mild and can be minimized with use short echo time (TE) 3DTOF MRA acquisitions and/or contrast enhanced MRA.112,113 Contrast enhanced MRA is performed with a very short TE that minimizes susceptibility effects produced by aneurysm coils and signal loss due to turbulent flow (intravoxel phase dispersion). Intravascular contrast also reduces signal loss due to these factors and reduces the loss of signal in slowly flowing blood that occurs due to spin saturation.114 Finally, use of elliptic centric view-order sampling of κ-space enables data filling of the central portions of K-space responsible for image contrast during early arterial phase of the gadolinium injection, helping to reduce the effects of venous contamination. While some studies have found no added benefit of contrast administration for MRA of coiled aneurysms.22, others have found contrast enhanced centric phase encoded MRA more sensitive for residual flow in coiled aneurysms.114, and especially aneurysms treated with stent-assisted coiling.115 Residual aneurysm filling may be difficult to detect within coiled aneurysms with DSA (“the gold standard”) against the opaque coil mass or due to subtraction artifacts. Therefore, it is difficult to compare sensitivity of MRA versus DSA. Some have observed that contrast enhanced MRA.23 or 3DTOF MRA at 3T may actually demonstrate contrast filling within the coil mass more clearly than DSA.116 Finally, use of MRA (including contrast enhanced MRA) has been found to be more cost-effective than follow-up with intra-arterial DSA.24

1.7.1 MRA Protocol for Imaging of Coiled Aneurysms:117

  • NVPA Coil

  • Axial plane

  • Pulse sequence: Vascular TOF SPGR

  • Imaging options: Variable bandwidth, Fast, 2ip512, Zip2, Smart Prep

  • TE: Minimum

  • Flip angle: 45

  • Bandwidth: 41.67

  • Freq: 320

  • Phase: 224

  • Nex: 1

  • Phase FOV: 0.75

  • Scan time: 1:01

  • FOV: 22

  • Slice thickness: 1.4

  • LOCS per slab: 60

  • Frequency direction: AP

  • User CVs screen

  • Maximum monitor period: 30

  • Image acquisition delay: 5

  • Turbo mode (1) Faster

  • Elliptical Centric (1) on

1.8 Indocyanine Green Videoangiography

Microscope-integrated indocyanine green (ICG) videoangiography is a useful imaging technique during aneurysm surgery118,119 and other kinds of neurosurgical procedures. ICG is a near-infrared fluorescent dye that binds tightly to plasma globulins and remains intravascular with normal vascular permeability. It has a half-life of 3–4 min and is eliminated exclusively by the liver. Following an IV injection of ICG, fluorescence is induced with a microscope-integrated light source with a wavelength of 700–850 nm and is imaged with a video camera. It is useful in aneurysm surgery to (1) check for complete exclusion of the aneurysm after clipping and (2) make sure the adjacent parent vessels are still patent. ICG is only visible within exposed vessels in the surgical field; it cannot be visualized through tissue.

  1. 1)

    Additional applications. Aside from aneurysm surgery, ICG has been used in surgery for:

    1. a)

      Dural arteriovenous fistulas.120

    2. b)

      EC-IC bypass.121

    3. c)

      Decompressive craniectomy for stroke.122

    4. d)

      Brain tumors.123,124

    5. e)

      Spinal vascular lesions.125127

  2. 2)

    Devices and drug

    1. a)

      The microscope (Zeiss Pentero) must be outfitted with the ICG videoangiography module (FLOW 800, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany)

    2. b)

      IC-Green™ (Akorn, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL) comes in 25 mg vials. The drug contains 5% sodium iodine. It should not be given to patients with a history of adverse reactions to iodine or iodinated contrast media.

      1. i)

        Dose: 25 mg per dose, one-size-fits-all.

      2. ii)

        Alternative dose: 0.2–0.5 mg/kg; daily dose should not exceed 5 mg/kg.128

  3. 3)

    Technique

    1. a)

      Consent. Informed consent should include the risk of anaphylaxis (1 in 500)129

    2. b)

      Just prior to completing the surgical exposure, have the anesthesiologist prepare the ICG.

    3. c)

      Activate video recording on the microscope.

    4. d)

      Inject the ICG.

    5. e)

      Continue recording until the bolus of dye passes through the area of interest.

  4. 4)

    Tips:

    1. a)

      Repeat doses can be given 20 min or less after the most recent dose without significant residual fluorescence interference from the previous injection.

    2. b)

      Oxygen saturation measurements may show falsely low values during the first pass of the drug.130

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harrigan, M.R., Deveikis, J.P. (2013). Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment. In: Handbook of Cerebrovascular Disease and Neurointerventional Technique. Contemporary Medical Imaging, vol 1. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-946-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-946-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-945-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-946-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics