Pain Complications of Mesh Surgery
Pelvic reconstructive surgery offers many treatments for pelvic organ prolapse. Surgical solutions include vaginal, laparoscopic, and abdominal approaches with native vaginal tissue, fascia autografts and allografts, xenografts, and synthetic absorbable and nonabsorbable mesh. Augmentation of traditional vaginal prolapse techniques using nonabsorbable synthetic mesh demonstrated low morbidity and high anatomic success when initially described. This seemingly reassuring data resulted in the rapid and widespread adoption of such techniques by Gynecologists and Urologists worldwide. Innumerable manufactured products (“kits”) for single or multiple compartment prolapse repair are available to pelvic surgeons. Mesh kits have many commonly known advantages such as tension-free placement design, simple technique that is easily repeated with minimal training, and short operative time and disadvantages including price, retraction, adherence, and the potential long-term effect of vaginal atrophy on the health of the mesh implant.
KeywordsPelvic Organ Prolapse Pudendal Nerve Synthetic Mesh Prolapse Repair Mesh Placement
- 7.United States Census Bureau, 2004. U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race, and hispanic origin. http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/usinterimproj. Accessed 1 Jan 2011.
- 21.Moore RD, Davila GW. Vaginal mesh kits for prolapse 2010: update in technology and techniques to minimize complications. Female Patient. 2010;35:33–7.Google Scholar
- 22.The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE). http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/search.cfm. Accessed 1 Jan 2011.
- 23.The United States Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Alerts and Notices on Surgical Mesh. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm142636.htm. Accessed 1 Jan 2011.
- 24.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Surgical repair of vaginal wall prolapse using mesh 2008. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/IPG267. Accessed 1 Feb 2011.
- 34.Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prosthesis (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2011;22:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Mucowski SJ, Jumalov C, Phelps JY. Use of vaginal mesh in the face of recent FDA warnings and litigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:103.e1–4.Google Scholar
- 40.Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takal T, Heiskanen E, Merikari M, Niemi K, et al. Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:235.e1–8.Google Scholar
- 42.Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2004;244:931–7.Google Scholar