Advertisement

Transvaginal Mesh Complications

  • Farzeen FirooziEmail author
  • Howard B. Goldman
Chapter
Part of the Current Clinical Urology book series (CCU)

Abstract

The lifetime risk of requiring pelvic surgery for vaginal prolapse or incontinence for a woman in the United States is 11%, with a risk for reoperation of 29% [1]. Traditional vaginal repairs for prolapse using only the patient’s native tissues have had reported rates of recurrence ranging from 10 to 50% depending on the compartment repaired [2]. In the last 10 years, there have been advancements in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery to create repairs that are reproducible with improved subjective and objective outcomes.

Keywords

Vaginal Wall Synthetic Mesh Anterior Vaginal Wall Transvaginal Mesh Mesh Complication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(4):CD004014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meschia M, Pifarotti P, Bernasconi F, et al. Porcine skin collagen implants to prevent anterior vaginal wall prolapse recurrence: a multicenter, randomized study. J Urol. 2007;177:192–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Kwon C, et al. A prospective randomized trial using solvent dehydrated fascia lata for the prevention of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1649–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1299–304; discussion 1304–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1357–62; discussion 1362–4.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, et al. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1762–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maher CF, Feiner B, DeCuyper EM, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy versus total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:360.e1–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ulmsten U, Petros P. Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1995;29:75–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hiltunen R, Nieminen K, Takala T, et al. Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:455–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:891–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1826–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldman HB, Fitzgerald MP. Transvaginal mesh for cystocele repair. J Urol. 2010;183:430–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Firoozi F, Goldman HB. Transvaginal excision of mesh erosion involving the bladder after mesh placement using a prolapse kit: a novel technique. Urology. 2010;75:203–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanses TV, Shahryarinejad A, Molden S, et al. Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows’ Pelvic Research Network study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201 519.e1–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ridgeway B, Walters MD, Paraiso MF, et al. Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:703.e1–7.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Firoozi F, Ingber MS, Moore CK, et al. Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new prostheses/grafts complication classification system. J Urol, 2012;187(5):1674–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Pelvic Health and Reconstructive Surgery, The Arthur Smith Institute for UrologyHofstra North Shore-LIJ School of MedicineGarden CityUSA
  2. 2.Center for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Glickman Urologic and Kidney InstituteThe Cleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Lerner College of MedicineCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations