Advertisement

Retropubic Bladder Neck Suspensions

  • Elizabeth R. MuellerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Current Clinical Urology book series (CCU)

Abstract

Open abdominal retropubic procedures for urinary incontinence were widely performed in the United States starting in the 1950s till the turn of the century when the use of transvaginal synthetic slings gained in popularity [1]. That said, data regarding the success and complications of retropubic suspensions were mostly expert opinion, cases series, or underpowered randomized trials until the last decade when two large randomized trials comparing the Burch urethropexy to suburethral slings were published [2, 3]. This chapter will review the retropubic procedures for incontinence and the diagnosis and management of complications that arise from retropubic urethropexy procedures.

Keywords

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Bladder Neck Vaginal Wall Stress Incontinence Pubic Bone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Anger JT, Weinberg AE, Albo ME, et al. Trends in surgical management of stress urinary incontinence among female Medicare beneficiaries. Urol. 2009;74: 283–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ward KL, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:324–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albo ME, Richter H, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2143–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marshall VF, Marchetti AA, Krantz KE. The correction of stress incontinence by simple vesico-urethral suspension. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949;88:509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burch J. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;81:281–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    White GR. A radical cure by suturing lateral sulci of vagina to the white line of the pelvic fascia. J Am Med Assoc. 1909;21:1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Richardson AC, Edmonds PB, Williams NL. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to paravaginal fascial defect. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57:357–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wallwiener D, Grischke E, Rimbach S, et al. Endoscopic retropubic colposuspension: “Retziusscopy” versus laparoscopy—a reasonable enlargement of the operative spectrum in the management of recurrent stress incontinence? Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1995;3:115–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ross J. Two techniques of laparoscopic Burch repair for stress incontinence: a prospective, randomized study. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3:351–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zullo F, Palomba S, Piccione F, et al. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension: a randomized controlled trial comparing two transperitoneal surgical techniques. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:783–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith ARB, Dmochowski R, Hilton P, et al. Surgery for urinary incontinence in women. In: Abrams P, Cardoza L, Khoury S, et al. 4th ed. Plymouth: Health Publication; 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Appell R, Dmochowski RR, Blaivas J, et al. American Urological Association Guidelines for the surgical management of stress incontinence: 2009 update. Plymouth: American Urological Association, Education and Research Inc.; 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ward K, Hilton P, United K, et al. Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ. 2002;325:67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mainprize TC, Drutz HP. The Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure—a critical review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;43:724–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chai T, Albo M, Richter H, et al. Complications in women undergoing Burch colposuspension versus autologous rectus fascial sling for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2009;181:2192–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith PP, Appell RA. Functional obstructed voiding in the neurologically normal patient. Curr Urol Rep. 2006;7:346–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anger JT, Amundsen CL, Webster GD. Obstruction after Burch colposuspension: a return to retropubic urethrolysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17:455–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knoeller SM, Uhl M, Herget GW. Osteitis or osteomyelitis of the pubis? Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72:541.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Departments of Urology and Obstetrics/GynecologyLoyola University Chicago Stritch School of MedicineMaywoodUSA

Personalised recommendations