Abstract
Infertility, defined as the failure to conceive after 1 year of unprotected intercourse, affects about 15% of reproductive age couples. Over the years, treatment of infertility has become increasingly more successful, and this has largely been dependent on interdisciplinary interactions among a number of specialties. With joint efforts between primary care physicians, obstetricians, urologists, geneticists, endocrinologists, and andrologists, couples are now able to undergo comprehensive stepwise evaluations that allow their physicians to determine the cause of infertility, provide evidence-based advice regarding prognoses, and determine the best approach toward achieving pregnancy or family planning.
In this chapter, we focus on the male infertility evaluation, and the medical and surgical treatment options available, both alone and in combination with assisted reproductive techniques (ART). It is our goal to discuss the thought process behind the evaluation and when to proceed with each type of intervention. Ultimately, this chapter will assist in the identification of tests to initiate the infertility evaluation, recognize criteria for subspecialty referral, and assist with patient counseling. In addition, it can serve as a general framework to help urologists and infertility specialists formulate plans for evaluation and treatment of their infertility patients.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril. 1991;56:192–3.
Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6:811–6.
The Optimal Evaluation of the Infertile Male: Best Practice Statement, Revised 2010. http://www.auanet.org/content/media/optimalevaluation2010.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2011.
Carlsen E, Andersson AM, Petersen JH, et al. History of febrile illness and variation in semen quality. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2089–92.
Sigman M, Jarow JP. Endocrine evaluation of infertile men. Urology. 1997;50:659–64.
Sigman M, Jarow JP. Male Infertility. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 609–53.
Augarten A, Weissenberg R, Pariente C, et al. Reversible male infertility in late onset congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J Endocrinol Invest. 1991;14:237–40.
Segal S, Yaffe H, Laufer N, et al. Male hyperprolactinemia:effects on fertility. Fertil Steril. 1979;32:556–61.
De Rosa M, Colao A, Di Sarno A, et al. Cabergoline treatment rapidly improves gonadal function in hyperprolactinemic males: a comparison with bromocriptine. Eur J Endocrinol. 1998;138:286–93.
van’t Verlaat JW, Croughs RJ. Withdrawal of bromocriptine after long-term therapy for macroprolactinomas; effect on plasma prolactin and tumour size. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1991;34:175–8.
Mathur S, Williamson HO, Baker ME, et al. Sperm motility on postcoital testing correlates with male autoimmunity to sperm. Fertil Steril. 1984;41:81–7.
Robinson JN, Forman RG, Nicholson SC, et al. A comparison of intrauterine insemination in superovulated cycles to intercourse in couples where the male is receiving steroids for the treatment of autoimmune infertility. Fertil Steril. 1995;63:1260–6.
Lähteenmäki A, Räsänen M, Hovatta O. Low-dose prednisolone does not improve the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in male immunological infertility. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3124–9.
Kamischke A, Nieschlag E. Treatment of retrograde ejaculation and anejaculation. Hum Reprod Update. 1999;5:448–74.
Ghanem H, Shamloul R. An evidence-based perspective to the medical treatment of male infertility: a short review. Urol Int. 2009;82:125–9.
Skakkebaek NE, Hammen R, Philip J, et al. Quantification of human seminiferous epithelium. 3. Histologicalstudies in 44 infertile men with normal chromosome complements. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A. 1973;81:97–111.
Kahraman S, Ozgur S, Aksoy S, et al. High implantation and pregnancy rates with testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:673–6.
Yoshida A, Miura K, Shirai M. Evaluation of seminiferous tubule scores obtained through testicular biopsy examinations of nonobstructive azoospermic men. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:514–8.
Kessaris DN, Wasserman P, Mellinger BC. Histopathological and cytopathological correlations of percutaneous testis biopsy and open testis biopsy in infertile men. J Urol. 1995;153:1151–5.
Carpi A, Agarwal A, Sabanegh E, et al. Percutaneous biopsy of the testicle: a mini review with a proposal flow chart for non-obstructive azoospermia. Ann Med. 2011;43:83–9.
Sheynkin YR, Ye Z, Menendez S, et al. Controlled comparison of percutaneous and microsurgical sperm retrieval in men with obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3086–9.
Jarow JP. Transrectal ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Androl. 1996;17:467–72.
Potts JM, Pasqualotto FF, Nelson D, et al. Patient characteristics associated with vasectomy reversal. J Urol. 1999;161:1835–9.
Belker AM, Thomas Jr AJ, Fuchs EF, et al. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the vasovasostomy study group. J Urol. 1991;145:505–11.
Kolettis PN, Sabanegh ES, Nalesnik JG, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after vasectomy reversal for female partners 35 years old or older. J Urol. 2003;169:2250–2.
Pasqualotto FF, Pasqualotto EB, Ågarwal A, et al. Results of microsurgical anastomosis in men with seminal tract obstruction due to inguinal herniorrhaphy. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2003;58:305–9.
Johnson CW, Bingham JB, Goluboff ET, et al. Transurethral resection of the ejaculatory ducts for treating ejaculatory symptoms. BJU Int. 2005;95:117–9.
Witt MA, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele: a progressive or static lesion? Urology. 1993;42:541–3.
Report on Varicocele and Infertility: An AUA Best Practice Policy and ASRM Practice Committee Report, Reviewed and Validity Confirmed 2010. www.auanet.org/resources.cfm?ID=466. Accessed 12 June 2011.
Steckel J, Dicker AP, Goldstein M. Relationship between varicocele size and response to varicocelectomy. J Urol. 1993;149:769–71.
Jarow JP, Ogle SR, Eskew LA. Seminal improvement following repair of ultrasound detected subclinical varicoceles. J Urol. 1996;155:1287–90.
Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, et al. Efficacy of varicocelectomy in improving semen parameters: new meta-analytical approach. Urology. 2007;70:532–8.
Kolettis PN, Thomas Jr AJ. Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: a critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Urol. 1997;158:467–70.
Lee R, Li PS, Goldstein M, et al. A decision analysis of treatments for obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2043–9.
Meng MV, Greene KL, Turek PJ. Surgery or assisted reproduction? A decision analysis of treatment costs in male infertility. J Urol. 2005;174:1926–31.
de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1851–62.
Bagis T, Haydardedeoglu B, Kilicdag EB, et al. Single versus double intrauterine insemination in multi-follicular ovarian hyperstimulation cycles: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1684–90.
Gunby J, Daya S. IVF Directors Group of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:550–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chandler, K., Sabanegh, E. (2012). Medical and Surgical Interventions in Male Fertility. In: Shoskes, D. (eds) Urological Men’s Health. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-900-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-900-6_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-899-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-900-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)