Advertisement

Chimeras and Hybrids – How to Approach Multifaceted Research?

  • Gisela Badura-Lotter
  • Marcus Düwell
Part of the Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine book series (STEMCELL)

Abstract

Chimeras and Hybrids – How to Approach a Multifaceted Research?

Since a couple of years now, the creation of chimeras and hybrids has left the realm of myth and legend and entered into the reality of scientific research. The more it advances towards the creation of human-animal mixtures, the more the need for ethical and legal regulation is claimed. In our article, we will clarify different biological definitions concerning mosaics, chimeras and hybrids and contrast them with a new concept for an ethical evaluation of these highly diverse research fields. The proposed concept is illustrated by an example and some fundamental ethical reflections should briefly map the actual debate as well as the needs for further ethical reflection.

Keywords

Bioethics Chimeras Hybrids Research ethics Species integrity 

References

  1. 1.
    Owen RD. Immunogenetic consequences of vascular anastomoses between bovine twins. Science 1945; 102:400–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rossant J, Spence A. Chimeras and mosaics in mouse mutant analysis. Trends Genet. 1998; 14:358–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bi X, Rong YS. Genome manipulation by homologous recombination in Drosophila. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2003; 2:142–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sauer B, Henderson N. Site-specific DNA recombination in mammalian cells by the Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:5166–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tarkowski AK. Mouse chimaeras revisited: recollections and reflections. Int J Dev Biol. 1998; 42:903–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    St John J, Lovell-Badge R. Human-animal cytoplasmic hybrid embryos, mitochondria, and an energetic debate. Nat Cell Biol. 2007; 9:988–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strelchenko N, Kukharenko V, Shkumatov A, Verlinsky O, Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Reprogramming of human somatic cells by embryonic stem cell cytoplast. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 12:107–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Epstein AL, Manservigi R. Herpesvirus/retrovirus chimeric vectors. Curr Gene Ther. 2004; 4:409–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wells DJ, Wells KE. Gene transfer studies in animals: what do they really tell us about the prospects for gene therapy in DMD? Neuromuscul Disord. 2002; 12 Suppl 1:S11–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robert JS, Baylis F. Crossing species boundaries. Am J Bioeth. 2003; 3:1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loike JD, Tendler M. Reconstituting a human brain in animals: a Jewish perspective on human sanctity. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2008; 18:347–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gitter D. Ownership of human tissue: a proposal for federal recognition of human research participants’ property rights in their biological material. Washington and Lee Law Review 2004; 61:257–345.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsosie R. Cultural challenges to biotechnology: Native American genetic resources and the concept of cultural harm. J Law Med Ethics 2007; 35:396–411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muotri AR, Nakashima K, Toni N, Sandler VM, Gage FH. Development of functional human embryonic stem cell-derived neurons in mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:18644–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ourednik V, Ourednik J, Flax JD, Zawada WM, Hutt C, Yang C, et al. Segregation of human neural stem cells in the developing primate forebrain. Science 2001; 293:1820–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ÓDoherty A, Ruf S, Mulligan C, Hildreth V, Errington ML, Cooke S, et al. An aneuploid mouse strain carrying human chromosome 21 with Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 2005; 309:2033–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen JC, Chang ML, Lee H, Muench MO. Prevention of graft rejection by donor type II CD8(+) T cells (Tc2 cells) is not sufficient to improve engraftment in fetal transplantation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005; 20:35–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Almeida-Porada G, Porada CD, Chamberlain J, Torabi A, Zanjani ED. Formation of human hepatocytes by human hematopoietic stem cells in sheep. Blood 2004; 104:2582–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen Y, He ZX, Liu A, Wang K, Mao WW, Chu JX, et al. Embryonic stem cells generated by nuclear transfer of human somatic nuclei into rabbit oocytes. Cell Res. 2003; 13:251–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baker DE, Harrison NJ, Maltby E, Smith K, Moore HD, Shaw PJ, et al. Adaptation to ­culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25:207–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Werbowetski-Ogilvie TE, Bosse M, Stewart M, Schnerch A, Ramos-Mejia V, Rouleau A, et al. Characterization of human embryonic stem cells with features of neoplastic progression. Nat Biotechnol. 2009; 27:91–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simerly C, Dominko T, Navara C, Payne C, Capuano S, Gosman G, et al. Molecular correlates of primate nuclear transfer failures. Science 2003; 300:297.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brambrink T, Hochedlinger K, Bell G, Jaenisch R. ES cells derived from cloned and fertilized blastocysts are transcriptionally and functionally indistinguishable. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:933–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sasaki K, Nagao Y, Kitano Y, Hasegawa H, Shibata H, Takatoku M, et al. Hematopoietic microchimerism in sheep after in utero transplantation of cultured cynomolgus embryonic stem cells. Transplantation 2005; 79:32–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seggewiss R, Pittaluga S, Adler RL, Guenaga FJ, Ferguson C, Pilz IH, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia is associated with retroviral gene transfer to hematopoietic progenitor cells in a rhesus macaque. Blood 2006; 107:3865–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006; 126:663–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu J, Hu K, Smuga-Otto K, Tian S, Stewart R, Slukvin II, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cells free of vector and transgene sequences. Science 2009; 324:797–801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Toi te taiao. The cultural, spiritual and ethical aspects of xenotransplantation: animal-to-human transplantation. Final report of the New Zealand’s Bioethics Council 2005.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rutgers B, Heeger R. Inherent worth and respect for animal integrity in Vlissingen DM, Fentener van M, Kasanmoentalib S, Visser T, Zwart H, editors. Recognizing the intrinsic value of animals. Beyond animal welfare. Assen; 1999. p. 41–52.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bovenkerk B, Brom FW, van den Bergh BJ. Brave new birds. The use of “animal integrity” in animal ethics. Hastings Cent Rep. 2002; 32:16–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lam TT, Hausen B, Boeke-Purkis K, Paniagua R, Lau M, Hook L, et al. Hyperacute rejection of hDAF-transgenic pig organ xenografts in cynomolgus monkeys: influence of pre-existing anti-pig antibodies and prevention by the alpha GAL glycoconjugate GAS914. Xenotransplantation 2004; 11:517–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Düwell M. Philosophical presuppositions of practical ethics, in Schaler J, editor. Singer under fire. The dangerous ethicist faces his critics, Chicago & La Salle: Open Court; 2009. p. 395–419.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Düwell M. Ästhetische Erfahrung und Moral. Über die Bedeutung der ästhetischen Erfahrung für die Handlungsspielräume des Menschen. Freiburg i.Br./München: Alber; 2000.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Düwell M. Der moralische Status von Embryonen und Feten. In: Düwell M, Steigleder K, editors. Bioethik–Eine Einführung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp; 2003. p. 221–9.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Department of Health and Social Security, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology (“The Warnock Report”); July 1984, Cmnd 9314.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Buckle S. Arguing from potential. Bioethics 1988; 2:226–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Oh HJ, Kim MK, Jang G, Kim HJ, Hong SG, Park K et al. Cloning endangered gray wolves (Canis lupus) from somatic cells collected post-mortem. Theriogenology 2008; 70:638–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gómez MC, Pope CE, Ricks DM, Lyons J, Dumas C, Dresser BL. Cloning endangered felids using heterospecific donor oocytes and interspecies embryo transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008; 21:76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gisela Badura-Lotter
    • 1
  • Marcus Düwell
  1. 1.Institute of the History, Theory, and Ethics of MedicineUlm UniversityUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations