Advertisement

Translational Stem Cell Research and Animal Use: Examining Ethical Issues and Opportunities

  • Kate M. Millar
Part of the Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine book series (STEMCELL)

Abstract

Recent developments in the field of stem cell research has generated notable ethical debate. This ethical discussion often emphasises human-centred issues, such as the ethical status of the embryo, with animal-centred issues being much less prominent. Further discussion of animal issues is needed given that stem cell research in its many forms has significant implications for the use of experimental animals and, more broadly, may impact on the changing nature of animal-human relationships. Three aspects of this new research phase raise prominent ethical issues relating to animal use: the creation of human-animal interspecies embryos; the use of in vivo animal models in translational stem cell research programmes; and the opportunity for embryonic stem cell tests to play a role as new alternatives to laboratory animal use. This chapter explores the increased focus on translational stem cell research and the implications for experimental animal use. When trying to set a context for ethical debate on this issue, applying an adapted ethical matrix for animal use in translational stem cell research may represent a useful tool, allowing users to explore not only individual ethical impacts, but also the ethical implications of long-term research trajectories.

Keywords

Ethical matrix Laboratory animals 3Rs Animal ethics Alternatives 

References

  1. 1.
    Evans M, Kaufman M. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292:154–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1981; 78:7634–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998; 282:1145–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006; 126:663–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamanaka S. A fresh look at iPS cells. Cell 2009; 137:13–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shultz LD, Ishikawa F, Greiner DL. Humanized mice in translational biomedical research. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7:118–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Society for Stem Cell Research. Guidelines for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells. International Society for Stem Cell Research, 2008.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen Y, He ZX, Liu A, Wang K, Mao WW, Chu JX et al. Embryonic stem cells generated by nuclear transfer of human somatic nuclei into rabbit oocytes. Cell Res 2003; 13:251–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skene L, Testa G, Hyun I, Jung KW, McNab A, Robertson J et al. Ethics report on interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer research. Cell Stem Cell 2009; 5:27–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hyun I, Taylor P, Testa G, Dickens B, Jung KW, McNab A et al. Ethical standards for human-to-animal chimera experiments in stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell 2007; 1:159–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baylis F. Animal eggs for stem cell research: A path not worth taking. Am J Bioeth 2008; 8:18–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robert JS, Baylis F. Crossing species boundaries. Am J Bioeth 2003; 3:1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greene M, Schill K, Takahashi S, Bateman-House A, Beauchamp T, Bok H et al. Ethics: Moral issues of human-non-human primate neural grafting. Science 2005; 309:385–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rollin B. Science and Ethics, Wiley, New York; 2005Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandoe P, Christiansen SB. Ethics of animal use. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford; 2007.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Millar K, Morton DM. Animal integrity in modern farming. In: Gunning J, Holm S, Kenway I. (eds.) Ethics, Law and Society VI. Ashgate Publishing, UK; 2009 pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The Ethics of Research Involving Animals. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London; 2005.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Home Office. Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals Great Britain 2008. HMSO, London; 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Russell W, Burch R. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, London: Methuen; 1959.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hobson-West P. What kind of animal is the “Three Rs”. ATLA 2009; 37:95–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    National Research Council. Toxicity testing in the 21st Century: A vision and a strategy. National Research Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Environmental Agents. Washington, DC, USA: The National Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weatherall D. et al. The use of non-human primates in research: The Weatherall Report. Academy of Medical Sciences, London; 2006.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quigley M. Non-human primates: The appropriate subjects of biomedical research? J Med Ethics 2007; 33:655–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Warnock M. The ethical regulation of science. Nature 2007; 450:615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Krtolica A, Dusko I, Genbacev O, Miller R. Human embryonic stem cells as a model for embryotoxicity screening. Regen Med 2009; 4:449–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marx-Stoelting P, Adriaens E, Ahr HJ, Bremer S, Garthoff B, Gelbke HP et al. A review of the implementation of embryonic stem cell test (EST). ATLA 2009; 37:313–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Passier R, van Laake LW, Mummery CL. Stem cell therapy and lessons from the heart. Nature 2009; 453:322–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Braam SR, Mummery CL. Human stem cell models for predictive cardiac safety ­pharmacology. Stem Cell Res 2010; 4:155–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mepham TB. A framework for the ethical evaluation of novel foods: the ethical matrix. J Agric Environ Ethics 2000; 12:165–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mepham TB, Kaiser M, Thorstensen E, Tomkins S, Millar K. Ethical Matrix Manual. Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), the Netherlands; 2006.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Millar K, Tomkins S. Ethical analysis of the use of GM in aquaculture: emerging issues for aquaculture development. J Agric Environ Ethics 2007; 20:437–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Millar K, Gamborg C, Sandøe P. Using participatory methods to explore the social and ethical issues raised by bioscience research programmes: the case of animal genomics research. In: Zollitisch, W, Winckler, C, Waiblinger, S, Haslberger, A, (eds.) Sustainable Food Production and Ethics. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2007; pp. 354–359.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    England G, Millar K. The ethics and role of AI with fresh and frozen semen in dogs. Reprod Domest Animals 2008; 43:165–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate M. Millar
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Applied Bioethics, School of BiosciencesUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations