Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Research pp 27–49Cite as

Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: First Meta-Analytic Evidence and Its Discussion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Psychiatry ((CCPSY))

Abstract

Despite growing evidence for the effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapy in general, the place of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (LTPP) remains controversial. Outcome studies of LTPP have been lacking for a long time. This chapter reports on the first meta-analysis of the effectiveness of LTPP, defined as lasting at least 1 year or 50 sessions. Findings suggest that LTPP yielded large and stable effects across various diagnoses and particularly in complex mental disorders (i.e., personality disorders, chronic mental disorders, and multiple mental disorders). For overall outcome, the effect sizes did even increase significantly after termination of treatment. The comparison of RCTs versus observational studies revealed no significant differences in outcome. If compared to other methods of psychotherapy that were predominantly less intensive or shorter term, LTPP proved to be significantly superior with regard to overall outcome, target problems, and personality functioning. As could be expected, discussion of findings was contentious but none of the raised concerns identified an issue that would have affected the overall conclusions of the meta-analysis. Nevertheless, further studies are particularly required to confirm the results and to allow for more refined analyses addressing the effects of LTPP both in specific disorders and in comparison to specific forms of therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gabbard GO, Gunderson JG, Fonagy P. The place of psychoanalytic treatments within psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:505–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kernberg OF. Psychoanalytic contributions to psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:497–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fonagy P, Roth A, Higgitt A. Psychodynamic therapies, evidence-based practice and clinical wisdom. Bull Menninger Clin. 2005;69:1–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leichsenring F. Comparative effects of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depression: a meta-analytic approach. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001;21:401–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leichsenring F, Leibing E. The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:1223–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leichsenring F, Rabung S, Leibing E. The efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in specific psychiatric disorders: a meta-analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:1208–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leichsenring F. Are psychoanalytic and psychodynamic psychotherapies effective? A review of empirical data. Int J Psychoanal. 2005;86:1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunderson J, Gabbard G. Making the case for psychoanalytic therapies in the current psychiatric environment. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1999;47:679–704.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kopta S, Howard K, Lowry J, Beutler L. Patterns of symptomatic recovery in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62:1009–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perry J, Banon E, Floriana I. Effectiveness of psychotherapy for personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156: 1312–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shea MT, Elkin I, Imber SD, et al. Course of depressive symptoms over follow-up. Findings from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Arch Gen Psychiatry. Oct 1992;49:782–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bateman A, Fonagy P. The effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder, a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1563–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bateman A, Fonagy P. Treatment of borderline personality disorder with psychoanalytically oriented partial hospitalization: an 18-month follow-up. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:36–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarkin JF, Levy KN, Lenzenweger MF, Kernberg OF. Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: a multiwave study. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:922–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Linehan MM, Tutek DA, Heard HL, Armstrong HE. Interpersonal outcome of cognitive behavioral treatment for chronically suicidal borderline patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1771–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Linehan MM, Comtois KA, Murray AM, et al. Two-year randomized trial  +  follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs. therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:757–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lenzenweger MF, Lane MC, Loranger AW, Kessler RC. DSM-IV personality disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;62:553–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kantojärvi L, Veijola J, Laksy K, et al. Co-occurrence of personality disorders with mood, anxiety, and substance abuse disorders in a young adult population. J Pers Disord. 2006;20:102–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grant BF, Hasin DS, Stinson FS, et al. Prevalence correlates and disability of personality disorders in the United States. Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:948–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Olfson M, Fireman B, Weissman MM, et al. Mental disorders and disability among patients in a primary care group practice. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:1734–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ormel J, VonKorff M, Ustun TB, Pini S, Korten A, Oldehinkel T. Common mental disorders and disability across cultures. Results from the WHO collaborative study on psychological problems in general health care. JAMA. 1994;272:1741–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamb WK. A meta-analysis of outcome studies in long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. Dissertation. Ann Arbor: ProQuest; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leichsenring F, Rabung S. The effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:1551–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thombs BD, Bassel M, Jewett LR, et al. Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (letters and reply). JAMA. 2009;301:930–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gotzsche PC. Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2000;21:585–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gabbard GO. Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: a basic text. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Crits-Christoph P, Barber JP. Long-term psychotherapy. In: Ingram RE, Snyder CR, editors. Handbook of psychological change: psychotherapy processes & practices for the 21st century. Hoboken: Wiley; 2000. p. 455–73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Berlin JA. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? Lancet. 1997;350:185–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Battle CC, Imber SD, Hoehn-Saric R, Nash ER, Frank JD. Target complaints as criteria of improvement. Am J Psychother. 1966;20:184–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Derogatis L. The SCL-90 manual I: scoring, administration and procedures for the SCL-90-R. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research; 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bond M, Gardner S, Christian J, Sigal J. Empirical study of selfrated defense styles. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bond M, Perry JC. Long-term changes in defense styles with psychodynamic psychotherapy for depressive, anxiety, and personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:1665–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Weissman MM, Bothwell S. Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33:1111–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hedges LV. Distribution theory for Glass´s estimator for effect size and related estimators. J Educ Stat. 1981;6:107–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research: applied social research methods. Newburry Park: Sage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Huedo-Medina TB, Sanchez-Meca J, Botella J, Marin-Martinez F. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I  2 index. Psychol Methods. 2006;11:193–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hedges LV, Vevea JL. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods. 1998;3:486–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Quintana SM, Minami T. Guidelines for meta-analyses of counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol. 2006;34:839–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rosenthal R. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:638–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. SPSS Inc. SPSS 15.0 command syntax reference. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J. MetaWin: statistical software for meta-analysis. Version 2.0. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carrol D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bachar E, Latzer Y, Kreitler S, Berry EM. Empirical comparison of two psychological therapies. Self psychology and cognitive orientation in the treatment of anorexia and bulimia. J Psychother Pract Res. 1999;8:115–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Barber JP, Morse JQ, Krakauer ID, Chittams J, Crits-Christoph K. Change in obsessive-compulsive and avoidant personality disorders following time-limited supportive–expressive therapy. Am Psychol. 1997;34:133–43.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bond M, Perry JC. Psychotropic medication use, personality disorder and improvement in long-term dynamic psychotherapy. J Nerv Ment Disord. 2006;194:21–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Clarkin JF, Foelsch PA, Levy KN, Hull JW, Delaney MSW, Kernberg OF. The development of a psychodynamic treatment for patients with borderline personality disorder: a preliminary study of behavioral change. J Pers Disord. 2001;15(6):487–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Levy KN, Meehan KB, Kelly KM, et al. Change in attachment patterns and reflective function in a randomized control trial of transference-focused psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74:1027–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dare C, Eisler I, Russell G, Treasure J, Dodge L. Psychological therapies for adults with anorexia nervosa: randomised controlled trial of out-patient treatments. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178:216–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Grande T, Dilg R, Jakobsen T, et al. Differential effects of two forms of psychoanalytic therapy: results of the Heidelberg–Berlin study. Psychother Res. 2006;16(4):470–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Gregory R, Chlebowski S, Kang D, Remen AL, Soderberg MG, Stepkovitch J, et al. A controlled trial of psychodynamic psychotherapy for co-occurring borderline personality disorder and alcohol use disorder. Psychother Theor Res Pract Train. 2008;45:28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Høglend P, Amlo S, Marble A, et al. Analysis of the patient–therapist relationship in dynamic psychotherapy: an experimental study of transference interpretations. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1739–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Høglend P, Bogwald KJ, Amlo S, Marble A, Ulberg R, Sjaastad M, et al. Transference interpretations in dynamic psychotherapy: do they really yield sustained effects? Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:763–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Huber D, Klug G, von Rad M. Die Münchner-Prozess-Outcome Studie: Ein Vergleich zwischen Psychoanalysen und psychodynamischen Psychotherapien unter besonderer Berücksichtigung therapiespezifischer Ergebnisse (The Munich process-outcome study. A comparison between psychoanalyses and psychotherapy). In: Stuhr U, Beutel M, editors. Langzeit- Psychotherapie. Perspektiven für Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer; 2001. p. 260–70.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Huber D, Klug G. Munich psychotherapy study (mps): the effectiveness of psychoanalytic longterm psychotherapy for depression. In: Society for Psychotherapy Research, editor. Book of abstracts. From research to practice. Ulm: Ulmer Textbank; 2006. p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Knekt P, Lindfors O, Harkanen T, et al. Randomized trial on the effectiveness of long-and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and solution-focused therapy on psychiatric symptoms during a 3-year follow-up. Psychol Med. 2008;38:689–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Knekt P, Lindfors O, Laaksonen MA, et al. Effectiveness of short-term and long-term psychotherapy on work ability and functional capacity – a randomized clinical trial on depressive and anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord. 2008;107:95–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Korner A, Gerull F, Meares R, Stevenson J. Borderline personality disorder treated with the conversational model: a replication study. Compr Psychiatry. 2006;47:406–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Leichsenring F, Biskup J, Kreische R, Staats H. The effectiveness of psychoanalytic therapy. First results of the Göttingen study of psychoanalytic and psychodynamic therapy. Int J Psychoanal. 2005;86:433–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Luborsky L, Stuart J, Friedman S, et al. The Penn psychoanalytic treatment collection: a set of complete and recorded psychoanalyses as a research resource. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2001;49:217–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Monsen J, Odland T, Faugli A, Daae E, Eilertsen DE. Personality disorders and psychosocial changes after intensive psychotherapy: a prospective follow-up study of an outpatient psychotherapy project, 5 years after end of treatment. Scand J Psychol. 1995;36:256–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Monsen J, Odland T, Faugli A, Daae E, Eilertsen D. Personality disorders: changes and stability after intensive psychotherapy focusing on affect consciousness. Psychother Res. 1995;5:33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Piper WE, Debbane EG, Bienvenu JP, Garant J. A comparative study of four forms of psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984;52(2):268–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Rudolf G, Manz R, Öri C. Ergebnisse psychoanalytischer Therapien (Outcome of psychoanalytic therapies). Z Psychosom Med Psychoanal. 1994;40(11):25–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Sandell R, Blomberg J, Lazar A, Carlsson J, Broberg J, Schubert J. Varieties of long-term outcome among patients in psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy: a review of findings in the Stockholm outcome of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy project (STOPPP). Int J Psychoanal. 2000;82:921–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Stevenson J, Meares R. An outcome study of psychotherapy for patients with borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1992;149:358–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Svartberg M, Stiles T, Seltzer MH. Randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of short-term dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive therapy for Cluster C personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:810–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Vinnars B, Barber JP, Noren K, Gallop R, Weinryb RM. Manualized supportive-expressive psychotherapy versus nonmanualized community-delivered psychodynamic therapy for patients with personality disorders: bridging efficacy and effectiveness. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:1933–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wilczek A, Barber JP, Gustavsson JP, Asberg M, Weinryb RM. Change after long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2004;52:1163–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J. 2003;327:557–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Begg C. Publication bias. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, editors. The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 1995. p. 399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Roth A, Fonagy P. What works for whom: a critical review of psychotherapy research. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Glass RM. Psychodynamic psychotherapy and research evidence. Bambi survives Godzilla? JAMA. 2008;300:1587–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Carey B. Psychoanalytic therapy wins backing. Though endangered as passé, it can be effective, a study finds. The New York Times: A18; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Beck AT, Bhar SS. Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (letter to the editor). JAMA. 2009;301:931.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Kriston L, Hölzel L, Härter M. Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (letter to the editor). JAMA. 2009;301:930–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Roepke S, Renneberg B. Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (letter to the editor). JAMA. 2009;301:931–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Thombs BD, Bassel M, Jewett LR. Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (letter to the editor). JAMA. 2009;301:930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Giesen-Bloo J, van Dyck R, Spinhoven P, et al. Outpatient psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: randomized trial of schema-focused therapy vs transference-focused psychotherapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:649–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Brockmann J, Schlüter T, Eckert J. Langzeitwirkungen psychoanalytischer und verhaltenstherapeutischer Langzeittherapien (Long-term outcome of long-term psychoanalytic and behavioral long-term therapy). Psychotherapeutics. 2006;51:15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Puschner B, Kraft S, Kächele H, Kordy H. Course of improvement over 2 years in psychoanalytic and psychodynamic outpatient psychotherapy. Psychol Psychother Theor Res Pract. 2007;80:51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (letter in reply). JAMA. 2009;301:932–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Shadish WR, Matt G, Navarro AM, Phillips G. The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: a meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;126:512–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Chambles DL, Hollon SD. Defining empirically supported therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66:7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199:15–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

    Sven Rabung Ph.D.

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Sven Rabung Ph.D.

  3. Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

    Falk Leichsenring DSc.

Authors
  1. Sven Rabung Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Falk Leichsenring DSc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Rabung Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Parkman St., Boston, 02114, Massachusetts, USA

    Raymond A. Levy

  2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Morrimac Street 101, Boston, 02114, Massachusetts, USA

    J. Stuart Ablon

  3. and Psychoanalysis, International Psychoanalytic University, Department of Clinical Psychology, Stromstr. 3, Berlin, 10555, Germany

    Horst Kächele

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rabung, S., Leichsenring, F. (2012). Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: First Meta-Analytic Evidence and Its Discussion. In: Levy, R., Ablon, J., Kächele, H. (eds) Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Research. Current Clinical Psychiatry. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-792-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-792-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-791-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-792-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation