Advertisement

Complex Applications of Simple FRAP on Membranes

Chapter
Part of the Handbook of Modern Biophysics book series (HBBT)

Abstract

There is an old adage that says “To see is to believe,” and it still seems to be true in many fields of biology. For an experimental validation of hypotheses, modern biology takes advantage of various fluorescence-based techniques (fluorescence microscopy, digital image analysis) for visualization and quantification. Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP), a widely used fluorescence-based technique to visualize and quantify the diffusion of fluorescently tagged proteins, is one good example. The first observation of fluorescence was made by Sir John Frederick William Herschel (1845) from a quinine solution, and the concept of fluorescence was first named after fluorite by Sir George G. Stokes (1857). On a microscopic scale, fluorescence was first observed by August K?ler (1904), who discovered that a biological tissue could autofluoresce under ultraviolet light irradiation. Later, it became popular in the biological field after M. Haitinger (1933) succeeded in staining histological specimens with fluorescent dyes for the first time, which is called the technique of secondary fluorescence, distinguishing it from autofluorescent tissue previously observed by M. Haitinger. Haitinger and others extended the application of the technique of secondary fluorescence to stain not only specific tissues but also bacteria, or other pathogens that are not autofluorescent [1]. Although the technique of secondary fluorescence demonstrated that nonfluorescent cells can be made fluorescent, it was a nonspecific staining technique. The breakthrough in a specific immunofluorescence staining technique was provided by Albert Coons in 1941 by attaching a fluorescent dye to an antibody [2]. Later, Coons and N.H. Kaplan developed the fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) immunofluorescence technique [3].

Keywords

Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching Anomalous Diffusion Fluorescent Molecule Fluorescence Recovery Complex Application 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Valeur B. 2001. On the origin of the terms fluorescence, phosphorescence and luminescence. In New trends in fluorescence spectroscopy: applications to chemical and life sciences, pp. 3–6. Ed B Valeur, J Brochon. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coons A, Creech H, Jones R. 1941. Immunological properties of an antibody containing a fluorescent group. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 47:200.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coons AH, Kaplan MH. 1950. Localization of antigen in tissue cells: improvements in a method for the detection of antigen by means of fluorescent antibody. J Exp Med 91:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Minsky M. 1988. Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope. Scanning 10:128–138.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shimomura O. 1995. A short story of aequorin. Biol Bull 189:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prasher DC, Eckenrode VK, Ward WW, Prendergast FG, Cormier MJ. 1992. Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein. Gene 111:229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC. 1994. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802–805.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Inouye S, Tsuji FI. 1994. Aequorea green fluorescent protein: expression of the gene and fluorescence characteristics of the recombinant protein. FEBS Lett 341:277–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liebman PA, Entine G. 1974. Lateral diffusion of visual pigment in photoreceptor disk membranes. Science 185:457–459.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Poo M, Cone RA. 1974. Lateral diffusion of rhodopsin in the photoreceptor membrane. Nature 247:438–441.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edidin M, Zagyansky Y, Lardner TJ. 1976. Measurement of membrane protein lateral diffusion in single cells. Science 191:466–468.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schlessinger J, Webb WW, Elson EL, Metzger H. 1976. Lateral motion and valence of Fc receptors on rat peritoneal mast cells. Nature 264:550–552.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Axelrod D, Koppel DE, Schlessinger J, Elson E, Webb WW. 1976. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J 16:1055–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lippincott-Schwartz J, Snapp E, Kenworthy AK. 2001. Studying protein dynamics in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:444–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lippincott-Schwartz J, Altan-Bonnet N, Patterson G. 2003. Photobleaching and photoactivation: following protein dynamics in living cells. Nat Cell Biol (Suppl):S7–S14.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reits EAJ, Neefjes JJ. 2001. From fixed to FRAP: measuring protein mobility and activity in living cells. Nat Cell Biol 3:E145–E147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sprague BL, McNally JG. 2005. FRAP analysis of binding: proper and fitting. Trends Cell Biol 15:84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stavreva DA, McNally JG. 2004. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) methods for visualizing protein dynamics in living mammalian cell nuclei. Methods Enzymol 375:443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lakowicz JR. 1999. Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feynman R, Leighton R, Sands M. 2005. The Feynman lectures on physics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakano A. 2002. Spinning-disk confocal microscopy—a cutting-edge tool for imaging of membrane traffic. Cell Struct Funct 27:349–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Evans L. 1998. Partial differential equations. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saffman PG, Delbrück M. 1975. Brownian motion in biological membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:3111–3113.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soumpasis DM. 1983. Theoretical analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery experiments. Biophys J 41:95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cafiso D. 2005. Structure and interactions of C2 domains at membrane surfaces. In Protein-lipid interactions: from membrane domains to cellular networks, pp. 403–422. Ed L Tamm. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carrero G, Crawford E, Hendzel MJ, de Vries G. 2004. Characterizing fluorescence recovery curves for nuclear proteins undergoing binding events. Bull Math Biol 66:1515–1545.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sprague BL, Pego RL, Stavreva DA, McNally JG. 2004. Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Biophys J 86:3473–3495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McNally JG. 2008. Quantitative FRAP in analysis of molecular binding dynamics in vivo. Methods Cell Biol 85:329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kang M, Kenworthy AK. 2008. A closed-form analytic expression for FRAP formula for the binding diffusion model. Biophys J 95(2):L13–L15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saxton MJ, Jacobson K. 1997. Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 26:373–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saxton MJ, 2001. Anomalous subdiffusion in fluorescence photobleaching recovery: a Monte Carlo study. Biophys J 81:2226–2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saxton MJ. 1996. Anomalous diffusion due to binding: a Monte Carlo study. Biophys J 70:1250–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saxton MJ. 1994. Anomalous diffusion due to obstacles: a Monte Carlo study. Biophys J 66:394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Saxton MJ. 2007. A biological interpretation of transient anomalous subdiffusion, I: qualitative model. Biophys J 92:1178–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Saxton MJ. 2008. A biological interpretation of transient anomalous subdiffusion, II: reaction kinetics. Biophys J 94:760–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nicolau DV Jr., Hancock JF, Burrage K. 2007. Sources of anomalous diffusion on cell membranes: a Monte Carlo study. Biophys J 92:1975–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ritchie K, Shan XY, Kondo J, Iwasawa K, Fujiwara T, Kusumi A. 2005. Detection of non-Brownian diffusion in the cell membrane in single molecule tracking. Biophys J 88:2266–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jin S, Verkman AS. 2007. Single particle tracking of complex diffusion in membranes: simulation and detection of barrier, raft, and interaction phenomena. J Phys Chem B 111:3625–3632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weiss M, Hashimoto H, Nilsson T. 2003. Anomalous protein diffusion in living cells as seen by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Biophys J 84:4043–4052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hughes B. 1995. Random walks and random environments. New York: Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nagle JF. 1992. Long tail kinetics in biophysics? Biophys J 63:366–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Feder TJ, Brust-Mascher I, Slattery JP, Baird B, Webb WW. 1996. Constrained diffusion or immobile fraction on cell surfaces: a new interpretation. Biophys J 70:2767–2773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Metzler R, Klafter J. 2000. The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys Rep 339:1–77.zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lubelski A, Klafter J. 2008. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching: the case of anomalous diffusion. Biophys J 94:4646–4653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weiss M. 2004. Challenges and artifacts in quantitative photobleaching experiments. Traffic 5:662–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Braga J, Desterro JM, Carmo-Fonseca M. 2004. Intracellular macromolecular mobility measured by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching with confocal laser scanning microscopes. Mol Biol Cell 15:4749–4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pucadyil TJ, Chattopadhyay A. 2006. Confocal fluorescence recovery after photobleaching of green fluorescent protein in solution. J Fluoresc 16:87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sinnecker D, Voigt P, Hellwig N, Schaefer M. 2005. Reversible photobleaching of enhanced green fluorescent proteins. Biochemistry 44:7085–7094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jacobson K, Sheets ED, Simson R. 1995. Revisiting the fluid mosaic model of membranes. Science 268:1441–1442.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular Physiology & BiophysicsVanderbilt University School of Medicine 718 Light HallNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Cell and Developmental BiologyVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleTennessee

Personalised recommendations