Advertisement

Tinnitus Caused and Influenced by the Somatosensory System

  • Tanit Ganz SanchezEmail author
  • Carina Bezerra Rocha

Keypoints

  1. 1.

    It is now recognized that many forms of tinnitus-related neural activity are much more complex and multimodal than ever thought.

     
  2. 2.

    It has become evident that contribution of non-auditory pathways is involved in eliciting or modulating many forms of tinnitus.

     
  3. 3.

    Many forms of tinnitus can be modulated by different actions such as forceful muscle contractions of the head and neck as well as eye movements.

     
  4. 4.

    Somatosensory stimulation such as that from pressure of myofascial trigger points, cutaneous stimulation at specific locations, electrical stimulation of the median nerve and hand, finger movements, and orofacial movements can also modulate or cause tinnitus, as can pressure applied to the temporomandibular joint or lateral pterygoid muscle.

     
  5. 5.

    This chapter discusses the causes of somatosensory tinnitus and in particular the influence from both head and neck regions on the auditory pathways in individuals with tinnitus.

     

Keywords

Tinnitus Somatic Somatosensory Central nervous system Muscle Cervical spine Temporomandibular joint. 

Abbreviations

MTP

Myofascial trigger point

AMTP

Active myofascial trigger point

LMTP

Latent myofascial trigger point

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Tinnitus Research Initiative for the creation and incentive of the workgroup of Somatosensory Tinnitus and Modulating Factors.

References

  1. 1.
    Levine, RA. Somatic modulation appears to be a fundamental attribute of tinntus. In: Hazell, JPW, ed. Proceedings of the Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar. London: The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Center; 1999:193–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanchez, TG; Guerra, GCY; Lorenzi, MC; Brandão, AL; Bento RF. The influence of voluntary muscle contractions upon the onset and modulation of tinnitus. Audiol. Neurootol. 2002; 7:370–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanchez, TG; Lima, AS; Brandao, AL; Lorenzi, MC; Bento RF. Somatic modulation of tinnitus:test reliability and results after repetitive muscle contraction training. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2007; 116:30–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cacace, AT; Cousins, JP; Parnes, SM; McFarland, DJ; Semenoff, D; Holmes, T; Davenport, C; Stegbauer, K; Lovely, TJ. Cutaneous-evoked tinnitus. II. Review of neuroanatomical, physiological and functional imaging studies. Audiol. Neurootol. 1999; 4:247–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coad, ML; Lockwood, A; Salvi, R; Burkard, R. Characteristics of patients with gaze-evoked tinnitus. Otol. Neurotol. 2001; 22(5):650–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baguley, DM; Phillips, J; Humphriss, RL; Jones, S; Axon, PR; Moffat, DA. The prevalence and onset of gaze modulation of tinnitus and increased sensitivity to noise after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma excision. Otol. Neurotol. 2006; 27:220–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sanchez, TG; Pio, MRB. Abolição de zumbido evocado pela movimentação ocular por meio de repetição do deslocamento do olhar:um método inovador. Arq. Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 11:451–3.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rocha, CA; Sanchez TG. Myofascial trigger points: another way of modulating tinnitus. Prog. Brain Res. 2007; 166:209–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sanchez, TG; Marcondes, RA; Kii, MA; Lima, AS; Rocha, CAB; Ono, CR; Bushpiegel, C. A different case of tinnitus modulation by tactile stimuli in a patient with pulsatile tinnitus. Presented at II Meeting of Tinnitus Research Initiative, Mônaco, 2007:21–3.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Møller, AR; Rollins, PR. The non-classical auditory pathways are involved in hearing in children but not in adults. Neurosci. Lett. 2002; 319:41–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cullington, H. Tinnitus evoked by finger movement: Brain plasticity after peripheral deafferentation. Neurology. 2001; 56:978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinchoff, RJ; Burkard, RF; Salvi, RJ; Coad, ML; Lockwood, AH. Modulation of tinnitus by voluntary jaw movements. Am. J. Otol. 1998; 19:785–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Björne, A. Tinnitus aurum as an effect of increased tension in the lateral pterygoid muscle. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1993; 109:969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubinstein, B. Tinnitus and craniomandibular disorders – is there a link? Swed. Dental J. Suppl. 1993; 95:1–46.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shore, S; Zhou, J; Koehler, S. Neural mechanisms underlying somatic tinnitus. Prog. Brain Res. 2007; 166:107–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen, R; Cohen, LG; Hallett, M. Nervous system reorganization following injury. Neuroscience. 2002; 111:761–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cacace, AT. Expanding the biological basis of tinnitus: crossmodal origins and the role of neuroplasticity. Hear. Res. 2003; 175:112–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sanchez, TG; Kii, MA. Modulating tinnitus with visual, muscular and tactile stimulation. Semin Hear, Tinnitus: Part II. 2008; 29:350–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rocha, CACB; Sanchez, TG; Siqueira, JTT. Myofascial trigger points:a possible way of modulating tinnitus? Audiol. Neurotol. 2008; 13:153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Levine, RA. Somatic (craniocervical) tinnitus and the dorsal cochlear nucleus hypothesis. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 1999; 20:351–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levine, RA; Abel, M; Cheng, H. CNS somatosensory– auditory interactions elicit or modulate tinnitus. Exp. Brain Res. 2003; 153(4):643–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Møller, AR; Møller, MB; Yokota, M. Some forms of tinnitus may involve the extralemniscal auditory pathway. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:1165–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hotta, T; Kameda, K. Interactions between somatic and visual or auditory responses in the thalamus of the cat. Exp. Neurol. 1963; 8:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thompson, RF; Smith, HE; Bliss, D. Auditory, somatic, sensory, and visual response interactions and interrelations in association and primary cortical fields of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 1963; 26:365–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wright, DD; Ryugo, DK. Mossy fiber projections from the cuneate nucleus to the cochlear nucleus in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 1996; 365:159–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Young, ED; Nelken, I; Conley, RA. Somatosensory effects on neurons in dorsal cochlear nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 1995; 73:743–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Travell, J; Simons, DG. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: The trigger point manual, upper half of body. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1999.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aronoff, GM. Myofascial pain syndrome and fibromyalgia: a critical assessment and alternate view. Clin. J. Pain. 1998; 14:74–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Davidoff, RA. Trigger points and myofascial pain: towards understanding how they affect headaches. Cephalalgia. 1998; 18:436–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hong, CZ; Hsueh, TC. Difference in pain relief after trigger point injections in myofascial pain patients with and without fibromyalgia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1996; 77:1161–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Estola-Partanen, M. Muscular tension and tinnitus:an experimental trial of trigger point injections on tinnitus [dissertation]. Tampere: Faculty of Medicine, University of Tampere; 2000.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang, F; Audette, J. Electrophysiologic characteristics of the local twitch response in subjects with active myofascial pain of the neck compared with a control group with latent trigger points. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000; 79:203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wyant, GM. Chronic pain syndrome and their treatment II. Trigger points. Canad. Anaesth. Soc. J. 1979; 26:216–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Simons DG. Myofascial pain syndromes: Where are we? Where are we going? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1988; 69:207–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yoganandan, N; Pintar, FA; Cusick, JF. Biomechanical analyses of whiplash injuries using an experimental model. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2002; 34:663–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Scholten-Peeters, GG; Bekkering, GE, Verhagen, AP et al. Clinical practice guideline for the physiotherapy of patients with whiplash-associated disorders. Spine 2002; 15:412–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vibert, D; Häusler, R. Acute peripheral vestibular deficits after whiplash injuries. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2003; 112:246–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oosterveld, WJ; Kortschot, HW; Kingma, GG; de Jong, HA; Saatci MR. Electronystagmographic findings following cervical whiplash injuries. Acta. Otolaryngol. 1991; 111:201–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Claussen, CF; Claussen, E. Neurootological contributions to the diagnostic follow-up after whiplash injuries. Acta. Otolaryngol. 1995 (suppl 520):53–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tranter, RM; Graham, JR. A review of the otological aspects of whiplash injury. J. Forensic Leg. Med. 2009; 16:53–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rowlands, RG; Campbell, IK; Kenyon, GS. Otological and vestibular symptoms in patients with low grade (Quebec grades one and two) whiplash injury. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2009; 123:182–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Eriksson, M; Gustafsson, S; Axelsson, A. Tinnitus and trigger points: a randomized cross-over study. In: Reich, GE; Vernon, JA, eds. Proceedings of the Fifth International Tinnitus Seminar, Portland, OR, 1995:81–3.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Friedman, MH; Weisberg, J. The craniocervical connection: a retrospective analysis of 300 whiplash patients with cervical and temporomandibular disorders. Cranio 2000; 18:163–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Garcia, R; Arrington, JA. The relationship between cervical whiplash and temporomandibular joint injuries: an MRI study. Cranio 1996; 14:233–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Krogstad, BS; Jokstad, A; Dahl, BL; Soboleva, U. Somatic complaints, psychologic distress, and treatment outcome in two groups of TMD patients, one previously subjected to whiplash injury. J. Orofac. Pain. 1998; 12:136–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Boniver, R. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction in whiplash injuries:association with tinnitus and vertigo. Int. Tinnitus J. 2002; 8:129–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bergman, H; Andersson, F; Isberg, A. Incidence of temporomandibular joint changes after whiplash trauma:a prospective study using MR imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1998; 171:1237–43.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    McKay, DC; Christensen, LV. Whiplash injuries of the temporomandibular joint in motor vehicle accidents: speculations and facts. J. Oral Rehabil. 1998; 25:731–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ferrari, R; Schrader, H; Obelieniene, D. Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders associated with whiplash injury in Lithuania. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1999; 87:653–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Otolaryngology DepartmentUniversity of São Paulo Medical SchoolSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations