Skip to main content

Recurrent Stroke Prevention I: Diuretic and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) – The PROGRESS Trial

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hypertension and Stroke

Abstract

The rationale and design of the Perindopril Protection Against Secondary Stroke Study (PROGRESS) was published in 1996 (1), while recruitment had already commenced in 1995. The study design involved a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial approach in which the blood pressure-lowering component was the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibiting agent perindopril with and without the addition of the thiazide diuretic indapamide. The primary outcome measure was recurrent stroke of all types (fatal, nonfatal, ischaemic and hemorrhagic). The total sample size was over 7,000 patients from almost 200 centres in ten countries worldwide with a follow up of a mean 4 years. The major findings were published in 2001. PROGRESS was the first study to show definitively that ACEI-based blood pressure-lowering regimens reduced the risk of recurrent stroke. This was particularly for haemorrhagic stroke and, importantly, was independent of baseline blood pressure. In other words, the benefits were not only for hypertensive patients, but for all participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. PROGRESS Management Committee. PROGRESS – perindopril protection against recurrent stroke study: status in July 1996. J Hypertens Suppl. 1996;14(6):S47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. MacMahon S, Rodgers A. The effects of blood pressure reduction in older patients: an overview of five randomized controlled trials in elderly hypertensives. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1993;15(6):967–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Does treatment of hypertension explain the decline in mortality from stroke? Br Medical J (Clin Res Ed). Jan 18 1986;292(6514):191–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. MacMahon S, Rodgers A. Blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment and stroke risk. J Hypertens Suppl. 1994;12(10):S5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Irie K, Yamaguchi T, Minematsu K, Omae T. The J-curve phenomenon in stroke recurrence. Stroke; J Cereb Circ. 1993;24(12):1844–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rodgers A, MacMahon S, Gamble G, Slattery J, Sandercock P, Warlow C. Blood pressure and risk of stroke in patients with cerebrovascular disease. The United Kingdom Transient Ischaemic Attack Collaborative Group. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1996;313(7050):147.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins R, MacMahon S. Blood pressure, antihypertensive drug treatment and the risks of stroke and of coronary heart disease. Br Med Bull. 1994;50(2):272–98.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carter AB. Hypotensive therapy in stroke survivors. Lancet. 1970;1(7645):485–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hypertension-Stroke Cooperative Study Group. Effect of antihypertensive treatment on stroke recurrence. JAMA. 1974;229(4):409–18.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The Dutch TIA. Trial Study Group. Trial of secondary prevention with atenolol after transient ischemic attack or nondisabling ischemic stroke. Stroke; J Cereb Circ. 1993;24(4):543–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson S, Olofsson BO, Wester PO. Atenolol in secondary prevention after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis (Basel, Switzerland). 1995;5:21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee RM, Delaney KH, Lu M. Perindopril treatment prolonged the lifespan of spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. Apr 1995;13(4):471–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrari R, Pasanisi G, Notarstefano P, Campo G, Gardini E, Ceconi C. Specific properties and effect of perindopril in controlling the renin-angiotensin system. Am J Hypertens. Sept 2005;18(9 Pt 2):142S–54S.

    Google Scholar 

  14. EMEA. Perindopril product resume. London, UK: The European Medicines Agency; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. SMPA. Indapamide product resume. Sweden: The Swedish Medical Products Agency; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. WHO. Cerebrovascular disorders. Vol. 24. Geneva: Offset Publications; World Health Organisation; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. Feb 1965;14:61–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lindley RI, Waddell F, Livingstone M, Warlow CP, Dennis MS, Sandercock P. Can simple questions assess outcome after stroke? Cerebrovas Dis (Basel, Switzerland). 1994;4:314–24.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harrap SB, Tzourio C, Cambien F, et al. The ACE gene I/D polymorphism is not associated with the blood pressure and cardiovascular benefits of ACE inhibition. Hypertension. Sept 2003;42(3):297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ratnasabapathy Y, Lawes CM, Anderson CS. The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS): clinical implications for older patients with cerebrovascular disease. Drugs Aging. 2003;20(4):241–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodgers A, Chapman N, Woodward M, et al. Perindopril-based blood pressure lowering in individuals with cerebrovascular disease: consistency of benefits by age, sex and region. J Hypertens. Mar 2004;22(3):653–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Berthet K, Neal BC, Chalmers JP, et al. Reductions in the risks of recurrent stroke in patients with and without diabetes: the PROGRESS Trial. Blood Press. 2004;13(1):7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hasegawa Y, Yamaguchi T, Omae T, Woodward M, Chalmers J. Effects of perindopril-based blood pressure lowering and of patient characteristics on the progression of silent brain infarct: the Perindopril Protection against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) CT Substudy in Japan. Hypertens Res. Mar 2004;27(3):147–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bath P, Algert C, Chapman N, Neal B. Association of mean platelet volume with risk of stroke among 3134 individuals with history of cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. Mar 2004;35(3):622–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Campbell DJ, Woodward M, Chalmers JP, et al. Perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering therapy reduces amino-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in individuals with cerebrovascular disease. J Hypertens. Mar 2007;25(3):699–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell DJ, Woodward M, Chalmers JP, et al. Prediction of heart failure by amino terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein in subjects with cerebrovascular disease. Hypertension. Jan 2005;45(1):69–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dufouil C, Chalmers J, Coskun O, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering on cerebral white matter hyperintensities in patients with stroke: the PROGRESS (Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Substudy. Circulation. Sept 13 2005;112(11):1644–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel A, Woodward M, Campbell DJ, et al. Plasma lipids predict myocardial infarction, but not stroke, in patients with established cerebrovascular disease. Eur Heart J. Sept 2005;26(18):1910–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Woodward M, Lowe GD, Campbell DJ, et al. Associations of inflammatory and hemostatic variables with the risk of recurrent stroke. Stroke. Oct 2005;36(10):2143–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Campbell DJ, Woodward M, Chalmers JP, et al. Soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in predicting ischemic stroke in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Neurol. Jan 2006;63(1):60–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Arima H, Hart RG, Colman S, et al. Perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering reduces major vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke. Oct 2005;36(10):2164–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chalmers J, Chapman N. Challenges for the prevention of primary and secondary stroke: the importance of lowering blood pressure and total cardiovascular risk. Blood Press. 2001;10(5–6):344–51.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Arima H, Chalmers J, Woodward M, et al. Lower target blood pressures are safe and effective for the prevention of recurrent stroke: the PROGRESS trial. J Hypertens. Jun 2006;24(6):1201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet. Sept 29 2001;358(9287):1033–41.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Progress Management Committee. PROGRESS – Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study: characteristics of the study population at baseline . J Hypertens. 1999;17(11):1647–55.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tzourio C, Anderson C, Chapman N, et al. Effects of blood pressure lowering with perindopril and indapamide therapy on dementia and cognitive decline in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. May 12 2003;163(9):1069–75.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. Nov 1975;12(3):189–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. Jan 20 2000;342(3):145–53.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet. Mar 23 2002;359(9311):995–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lithell H, Hansson L, Skoog I, et al. The Study on Cognition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE): principal results of a randomized double-blind intervention trial. J Hypertens. May 2003;21(5):875–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tamura T, Said S, Harris J, Lu W, Gerdes AM. Reverse remodeling of cardiac myocyte hypertrophy in hypertension and failure by targeting of the renin-angiotensin system. Circulation. Jul 11 2000;102(2):253–9.

    Google Scholar 

  42. McVeigh GE. Effects of perindopril on cardiovascular remodeling. Am J Cardiol. Oct 4 2001;88(7A):28i–35i.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, et al. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Eng J Med. Apr 10 2008;358(15):1547–59.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yusuf S, Teo K, Anderson C, et al. Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Sept 27 2008;372(9644):1174–83.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yusuf S, Diener HC, Sacco RL, et al. Telmisartan to prevent recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events. N Eng J Med. Sept 18 2008;359(12):1225–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Staessen JA, Wang JG, Thijs L. Cardiovascular protection and blood pressure reduction: a meta-analysis. Lancet. Oct 20 2001;358(9290):1305–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Turnbull F, Neal B, Ninomiya T, et al. Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). May 17 2008;336(7653):1121–3.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Post-stroke antihypertensive treatment study. A preliminary result. PATS Collaborating Group. . Chin Med J. 1995;108(9):710–17.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Pfeffer M, et al. Effects of long-term treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in the presence or absence of aspirin: a systematic review. Lancet. Oct 5 2002;360(9339):1037–43.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mackenzie IS, Brown MJ. Genetic profiling versus drug rotation in the optimisation of antihypertensive treatment. Clin Med (London, England). Sept–Oct 2002;2(5):465–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas K.A. Linden MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Linden, T.K., Donnan, G.A. (2011). Recurrent Stroke Prevention I: Diuretic and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) – The PROGRESS Trial. In: Aiyagari, V., Gorelick, P. (eds) Hypertension and Stroke. Clinical Hypertension and Vascular Diseases. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-010-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-010-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60761-009-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60761-010-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics