Abstract
Self-awareness is a particularly human trait. When it evolved, proto-humans became aware that they were destined to die. When language evolved, they were able to share this understanding with others. When written languages were developed, their thoughts about mortality were recorded in permanent form. The documents that have survived to the present convincingly demonstrate that humans have sought to understand why they become ill and die for a very long time. Cancer, in its many forms, is featured in the earliest of these documents [1]. It is feared and many forms of treatment have been employed throughout the ages, almost all of which were unsuccessful. By the nineteenth century, with the introduction of effective anesthesia, relatively safe major surgery became feasible. As a result, for the first time in history some patients with cancer were cured [2]. This created a cohort of cancer survivors. Shortly thereafter, it became clear that this population is prone to recurrence of the index cancer and/or new primary cancers and/or adverse effects of therapy. Treatments often failed, however, and major medical texts in the early-twentieth century made no mention of second primary cancers [3,4] but adverse effects of therapy were well known. This soon led to the concept of postoperative surveillance. This was facilitated in the late nineteenth century by the development of diagnostic x-rays [5]. Cancer patients also benefited by the introduction of radiation as a powerful treatment. Its hazards soon were recognized and those who had received radiation therapy as the initial treatment were soon candidates for surveillance. Relapse often occurred, as for those treated with surgery. Effective systemic therapy (oophorectomy for metastatic breast cancer) had its start in the late nineteenth century also [6]. The complications of this operation were presumably infrequent and manageable, but surveillance was probably carried out to determine how useful this novel form of therapy would be—since the concept of “chemical messengers” (hormones) was unknown until secretin was discovered in 1906 [7,8]. By the time effective systemic cytotoxic therapy was introduced into practice in the mid-twentieth century, the idea that it might eventually be curative was imagined by the few medical oncologists of that time and became a reality shortly thereafter, providing another cohort of survivors. The use of cytotoxic chemotherapy was regulated by regimen-specific drug administration protocols and institutional review boards (both novel concepts at that time). The posttreatment course was carefully documented. Documentation of initial disease status and estimation of prognosis were improved by the introduction of systematic staging methods such as the Federation Internationale de Gynecologie et d’Obstetrique and American Joint Committee on Cancer-Union for International Cancer Control systems. These common descriptors improved data collection and analysis. Introduction of new diagnostic testing modalities (serologic tumor marker measurement, computer-assisted tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, monoclonal antibody-based cellular stains, and the like) found immediate application in surveillance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Breasted JH. The Edwin Smith surgical papyrus. Vol. 1. Hieroglyphic transliteration, translation, and commentary. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1930. p. 324–7.
Wangensteen OH, Wangensteen SD. The rise of surgery: from empiric craft to scientific discipline. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1978. p. 567–72.
Cecil RL, Loeb RF, Gutman AB, McDermott W, Wolf HG, editors. Textbook of medicine. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1959.
Bell ET. Tumors. In: Bell ET, editor. Textbook of pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Fabiger; 1938. p. 232–371.
Roentgen WC. On a new kind of rays (translation). Br J Radiol. 1931;4:32.
Beatson GT. On the treatment of inoperable cases of carcinoma of the mamma: suggestions for a new method of treatment. Lancet. 1896;2:104–7.
Bayliss WM, Starling EH. On the causation of the so-called ‘peripheral reflex secretion’ of the pancreas. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]. 1902;69:352.
Yamada T, Alpers DH, Kaplowitz N, Laine L, Owyang C, Powell DW. Textbook of gastroenterology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2003. p. 67.
Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1990.
Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1992.
Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1992. p. 23.
Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1992. p. 8–9.
Eddy D. Designing a practice policy—standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA. 1990;263:3077–84.
Wilson D. Conflicts on health guideline panels. The New York Times: B1, B6. 3 Nov 2011.
Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1992. p. 32–5.
Bloom F. Science as a way of life: perplexities of a physician–scientist. Science. 2003;300:1680–5.
Eden J, Wheatley B, McNeil B, Sox H, editors. Knowing what works in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008. p. 19.
Eden J, Wheatley B, McNeil B, Sox H, editors. Knowing what works in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2008. p. 8.
Hill J, Bullock I, Alderson P. A summary of the methods that the National Clinical Guideline Centre uses to produce clinical guidelines for The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:752–7.
Committee on standards for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011 (available in electronic form at www.iom.edu).
O’Donnell RJ, Bruckner JD, Conrad EU. Soft tissue sarcoma. In: Johnson FE, Virgo KS, Edge SB, Pellegrini CA, Poston GJ, Schantz SP, Tsukamoto N, editors. Cancer patient follow-up. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995. p. 238–67.
Beitler AL, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Gibbs J, Kraybill WG. Current follow-up strategies after potentially curative resection of extremity sarcomas: results of a survey of the members of the Society of Surgical Oncology. Cancer. 2000;88:777–85.
Wennberg J, Gittelson A. Small area variations in health care delivery. Science. 1973;182:1102–8.
Chassin MR, Galvin RW, The National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. The urgent need to improve health care quality: Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280:1000–5.
Sakata K, Beitler AL, Gibbs JF, Kraybill WG, Virgo KS, Johnson FE. How surgeon age affects surveillance strategies for extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients after potentially curative treatment. J Surg Res. 2002;108:227–34.
Sakata K, Johnson FE, Kraybill WG, Virgo KS. Extremity soft tissue sarcoma patient follow-up: tumor grade and size affect surveillance strategies after potentially curative surgery. Int J Oncol. 2003;22:1335–43.
Johnson FE, Sakata K, Sarkar S, Audisio RA, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF, et al. Patient surveillance after treatment for soft-tissue sarcoma. Int J Oncol. 2011;38:233–9.
Johnson FE, Sakata K, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF, Beitler AL, Sarkar S, et al. Long-term management of patients after potentially curative treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcoma: practice patterns of members of the Society of Surgical Oncology. Surg Oncol. 2005;14:33–40.
Virgo KS, Johnson FE. Costs of surveillance after potentially curative treatment for cancer. In: Cancer patient follow-up. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995. chapter 3.
Goel A, Christy MEL, Virgo KS, Kraybill WG, Johnson FE. Costs of follow-up after potentially curative treatment for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. Int J Oncol. 2004;25:429–35.
Johnson FE. Overview. In: Johnson FE, Virgo KS, Edge SB, Pellegrini CA, Poston GJ, Schantz SP, Tsukomoto N, editors. Cancer patient follow-up. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995. chapter 1.
Siva S, Herschtal A, Thomas JM, Bernshaw DM, Gill S, Hicks R, et al. Impact of post-therapy positron emission tomography on prognostic stratification and surveillance after chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:3981–8.
Buchler T, Kubankova P, Boublikova L, Donatova Z, Foldyna M, Kanakova J, et al. Detection of second malignancies during long-term follow-up of testicular cancer survivors. Cancer. 2011;117:4212–8.
Virgo KS, Johnson FE. Costs of surveillance after potentially curative treatment for cancer. In: Johnson FE et al., editors. Cancer patient follow-up. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1995. chapter 3.
Mausner JS, Kramer S. Epidemiology—an introductory text. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1985.
Feinstein AR. Clinical epidemiology: the architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1985.
Sox HC, Blatt MA, Higgins MC, Marton KI. Medical decision making. Boston, MA: Butterworths; 1988.
Warner KE, Luce BR. Cost–benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press; 1982.
Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford, UK: Oxford Medical Publications; 1987.
Weinstein MC. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med. 1977;296:716–21.
Dasgupta AK, Pearce DW. Cost–benefit analysis: theory and practice. London, UK: Macmillan; 1972.
Mishan EJ. Cost–benefit analysis. London, UK: George Allen and Unwin; 1975.
Sugden R, Williams AH. The principles of practical cost–benefit analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1979.
Eastaugh SR. Medical economics and health finance. Dover, MA: Auburn House Publishing Company; 1981.
Jacobs P. The economics of health and medical care. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1987.
Weinstein MC. Principles of cost-effective resource allocation in health care organizations. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6:93–103.
Wonderling D, Sawyer L, Fenu E, Lovibond K, Laramée P. National Clinical Guideline Centre cost-effectiveness assessment for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:758–65.
Robinson R. Cost-effectiveness analysis. Br Med J. 1993;307(c):793–5.
Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. From cancer patient to cancer survivor—lost in transition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. p. 151–63.
Shalom MM, et al. Do survivorship care plans make a difference? A primary care provider perspective. J Oncol Pract. 2011;7:314–8.
Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, et al. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;36:4755–62.
The GIVIO Investigators. Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271:1587–92.
Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A, et al. Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1994;271:1593–7.
Phelps CE, Parente ST. Priority setting in medical technology and medical practice assessment. Medical Care. 1990;28:703–23.
NCI Expands Office of Cancer Survivorship Website. http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/1999/survivorship [Accessed Jun 2012]
Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29:126–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Humana Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johnson, D.Y., Johnson, F.E. (2013). Overview. In: Johnson, F., et al. Patient Surveillance After Cancer Treatment. Current Clinical Oncology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-969-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-969-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-968-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-969-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)