Skip to main content

Intracranial Intervention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Peripheral and Cerebrovascular Intervention

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

  • 1119 Accesses

Abstract

Cerebrovascular intervention is one of the most rapidly developing fields in medicine. Advances in stent and coil technology have allowed minimally invasive treatment of what were often thought of as untreatable conditions. The following chapter will serve as a review of the current techniques and evidence for treatment of acute ischemic stroke, symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease, and cerebral aneurysms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Osborn A. Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schmahmann JD. Vascular syndromes of the thalamus. Stroke. 2003;34:2264–2278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Osborn A. Circle of willis. Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999:105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liebeskind DS. Collateral circulation. Stroke. 2003;34:2279–2284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC. Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The northern Manhattan stroke study. Stroke. 1995;26:14–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee DK, Kim JS, Kwon SU, Yoo SH, Kang DW. Lesion patterns and stroke mechanism in atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery disease: early diffusion-weighted imaging study. Stroke. 2005;36:2583–2588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Derdeyn CP, Powers WJ, Grubb RL Jr. Hemodynamic effects of middle cerebral artery stenosis and occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1463–1469.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, et al. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1305–1316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kasner SE, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, et al. Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Circulation. 2006;113:555–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI. Angioplasty and stenting for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis: Rationale for a randomized clinical trial. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2007;17:355–363, viii–ix

    Google Scholar 

  11. Famakin BM, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Stern BJ, George MG. Causes and severity of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. Stroke. 2009;40:1999–2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta R. Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: what is the best treatment option? Stroke. 2008;39:1661–1662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI. A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:643–646.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mori T, Fukuoka M, Kazita K, Mori K. Follow-up study after intracranial percutaneous transluminal cerebral balloon angioplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1525–1533.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scozzafava J, Hussain MS, Yeo T, Jeerakathil T, Brindley PG. Case report: aggressive blood pressure management for carotid endarterectomy hyperperfusion syndrome. Can J Anaesth. 2006;53:764–768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abou–Chebl A, Reginelli J, Bajzer CT, Yadav JS. Intensive treatment of hypertension decreases the risk of hyperperfusion and intracerebral hemorrhage following carotid artery stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interven. 2007;69:690–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leung TW, Kwon SU, Wong KS. Management of patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke. 2006;1:20–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marks MP, Marcellus ML, Do HM, et al. Intracranial angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis: Long-term follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:525–530.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marks MP, Wojak JC, Al-Ali F, et al. Angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: clinical outcome. Stroke. 2006;37:1016–1020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. SSYLVIA Study Investigators. Stenting of symptomatic atherosclerotic lesions in the vertebral or intracranial arteries (ssylvia): study results. Stroke. 2004;35:1388–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Groschel K, Schnaudigel S, Pilgram SM, Wasser K, Kastrup A. A systematic review on outcome after stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2009;40:e340–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fiorella D, Levy EI, Turk AS, et al. Us multicenter experience with the wingspan stent system for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease: periprocedural results. Stroke. 2007;38:881–887.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fiorella DJ, Levy EI, Turk AS, et al. Target lesion revascularization after wingspan: Assessment of safety and durability. Stroke. 2009;40:106–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Turk AS, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC, et al. Influence of patient age and stenosis location on wingspan in-stent restenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:23–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zaidat OO, Klucznik R, Alexander MJ, et al. The NIH registry on use of the wingspan stent for symptomatic 70-99% intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology. 2008;70:1518–1524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nahab F, Lynn MJ, Kasner SE, et al. Risk factors associated with major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stenting. Neurology. 2009;72:2014–2019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kurre W, Berkefeld J, Sitzer M, Neumann-Haefelin T, du Mesnil de Rochemont R. Treatment of symptomatic high-grade intracranial stenoses with the balloon-expandable pharos stent: Initial experience. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:701–708.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miao ZR, Feng L, Li S, et al. Treatment of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis with balloon-mounted stents: Long-term follow-up at a single center. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:79–84; discussion 84–75.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fiorella D, Chow MM, Anderson M, Woo H, Rasmussen PA, Masaryk TJ. A 7-year experience with balloon-mounted coronary stents for the treatment of symptomatic vertebrobasilar intracranial atheromatous disease. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:236–242; discussion 242–233.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gupta R, Al-Ali F, Thomas AJ, et al. Safety, feasibility, and short-term follow-up of drug-eluting stent placement in the intracranial and extracranial circulation. Stroke. 2006;37:2562–2566.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J III, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Juvela S, Porras M, Poussa K. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: probability of and risk factors for aneurysm rupture. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:379–387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The national institute of neurological disorders and stroke rt-pa stroke study group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1317–1329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM, et al. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke. 2007;38:948–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2007;38:967–973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Latchaw RE, Alberts MJ, Lev MH, et al. Recommendations for imaging of acute ischemic stroke: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40:3646–3678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Aspects study group. Alberta stroke programme early ct score. Lancet. 2000;355:1670–1674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Barber PA, Silver B, Patel SC, Levine SR. Importance of early ischemic computed tomography changes using aspects in ninds rtpa stroke study. Stroke. 2005;36:2110–2115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hill MD, Rowley HA, Adler F, et al. Selection of acute ischemic stroke patients for intra-arterial thrombolysis with pro-urokinase by using aspects. Stroke. 2003;34:1925–1931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Muir KW, Buchan A, von Kummer R, Rother J, Baron JC. Imaging of acute stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:755–768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hjort N, Christensen S, Solling C, et al. Ischemic injury detected by diffusion imaging 11 minutes after stroke. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:462–465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Alexandrov AV, Molina CA, Grotta JC, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2170–2178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Demchuk AM, Saqqur M, Alexandrov AV. Transcranial doppler in acute stroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2005;15:473–480, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lev MH, Farkas J, Rodriguez VR, et al. Ct angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intraarterial thrombolysis: accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25:520–528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J III, Mandrekar JN, Schleck CD, Thielen KR, Kallmes DF. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: Evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007;243:812–819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nogueira RG, Yoo AJ, Buonanno FS, Hirsch JA. Endovascular approaches to acute stroke, part 2: A comprehensive review of studies and trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:859–875.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Shetty SK, Lev MH. Ct perfusion in acute stroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2005;15:481–501, ix.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Harris AD, Coutts SB, Frayne R. Diffusion and perfusion MRI imaging of acute ischemic stroke. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17:291–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Davis SM, Donnan GA, Parsons MW, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond 3h after stroke in the echoplanar imaging thrombolytic evaluation trial (epithet): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:299–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. De Silva DA, Fink JN, Christensen S, et al. Assessing reperfusion and recanalization as markers of clinical outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in the echoplanar imaging thrombolytic evaluation trial (epithet). Stroke. 2009;40:2872–2874.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hacke W, Furlan AJ, Al-Rawi Y, et al. Intravenous desmoteplase in patients with acute ischaemic stroke selected by MRI perfusion-diffusion weighted imaging or perfusion ct (dias-2): A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:141–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Donnan GA, Baron JC, Ma H, Davis SM. Penumbral selection of patients for trials of acute stroke therapy. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:261–269.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Olivot JM, Mlynash M, Thijs VN, et al. Relationships between cerebral perfusion and reversibility of acute diffusion lesions in defuse: Insights from radar. Stroke. 2009;40:1692–1697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McKinney A, Truwit CL, Kieffer S. Reversibility of an “apparent” infarct on dynamic perfusion ct after lytic therapy: comment regarding cerebral blood flow and blood volume thresholds. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1391–1392; author reply 1392–1393.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sobesky J, Zaro Weber O, Lehnhardt FG, et al. Does the mismatch match the penumbra? Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in early ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:980–985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Heiss WD, Sobesky J. Comparison of pet and dw/pw-MRI in acute ischemic stroke. Keio J Med. 2008;57:125–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in acute cerebral thromboembolism. J Am Med Assoc. 1999; 282: 2003–2011.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Ogawa A, Mori E, Minematsu K, et al. The MELT Japan Study Group. Stroke. 2007;38:2633–3639.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Saver J. Intra-arterial fibrinolysis for acute ischemic stroke. The message of MELT. Stroke. 2007;38:2627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Smith WS, Sung G, Starkman S, et al. Safety and efficacy of mechanical embolectomy in acute ischemic stroke: results of the MERCI trial. Stroke. 2005;36:1432–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bose A, Henkes H, Alfke K, et al. The Penumbra System: a mechanical device for the treatment of acute stroke due to thromboembolism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1409–13, Epub 2008 May 22

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gupta R, Vora NA, Horowitz MB, et al. Multimodal reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke: Factors predicting vessel recanalization. Stroke. 2006;37:986–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, et al. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: Pooled analysis of atlantis, ecass, and ninds rt-pa stroke trials. Lancet. 2004;363:768–774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Khatri P, Abruzzo T, Yeatts SD, Nichols C, Broderick JP, Tomsick TA. Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology. 2009;73:1066–1072.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Shazam Hussain MD, FRCP(C) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hussain, M.S., Gupta, R. (2012). Intracranial Intervention. In: Bhatt, D. (eds) Peripheral and Cerebrovascular Intervention. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-965-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-965-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-964-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-965-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics