Skip to main content

Why Have a Chest Pain Unit?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Short Stay Management of Chest Pain

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

Acute coronary syndromes are a leading cause of death in the United States with most patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. From the physician’s perspective, chest pain is a “high-volume, high-risk, and high-liability” symptom. From the health-care system’s perspective, chest pain evaluation is costly and difficult to complete in a timely manner using traditional approaches. To address these issues, chest pain centers have been developed as a means of providing quality care, ensuring patient safety, while maintaining cost-effectiveness. The concept of a chest pain “unit” has been expanded to a chest pain “center,” which represents a hospital-wide designation rather than a unit. Chest pain centers are now accredited based on standardized criteria that cover the full spectrum of care for acute coronary syndrome patients – from EMS to the hospital and back to the community. Within that framework, the chest pain unit generally focuses on the management of “low-risk” chest pain patients. The goal is to avoid inadvertent discharge of occult ACS patients in a cost-effective manner. This involves patient selection or risk stratification, serial testing to identify myocardial necrosis, and then provocative testing with or without imaging to identify unstable angina. Studies have shown this approach to be associated with several benefits – lower rates of missed acute coronary syndromes, reduced unnecessary inpatient admissions, reduced cost and length of stay, improved patient and physician satisfaction, improved patient quality of life, improved hospital resource utilization and inpatient bed capacity , decreased ambulance diversions, and fewer patients leaving the ED without being seen. Several of these benefits may be tied to economic benefits for the hospital, as well as benefits for those paying for health-care services. This chapter examines the justification for a chest pain unit in a hospital and its benefits to the health-care system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACEP Task Force Report on Boarding. April 2008. Emergency Department Crowding: High-Impact Solutions. www.acep.org

  2. Baugh CW, Bohan S. Estimating observation unit profitability with options modeling. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;(15):445–452.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farkouh ME, Smars PA, Reeder GS, et al. A clinical trial of a chest pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1882–1888.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaspoz JM, Lee TH, Weinstein MC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a new short-stay unit to “rule out” acute myocardial ischemia in low risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:1249–1259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibler WB, et al. A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;(25):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gibler WB, et al. Chest pain centers: Diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;(35):449–461.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman L, Cook EF, Brand DA, et al. A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain. NEJM. 1988;318:797–803.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman L.Weinberg M, Weisberg M, et al. A computer-derived protocol to aid in the diagnosis of emergency room patients with acute chest pain. NEJM. 1982;307:588–596.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gomez MA, Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, et al. An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: Results of a randomized study (ROMIO). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:25–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodacre SW, Nicholl J, et al. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain observation unit compared with routine care. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodacre SW, Quinney D, et al. Patient and primary care physician satisfaction with chest pain unit and routine care. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(8):827–833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Graff LG, Dallara J, Ross MA, et al. Impact on the care of the emergency department chest pain patient from the Chest Pain Evaluation Registry (CHEPER) Study. Am J Cardiol. 1997;(80):563–568.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics – 2008 Update American Heart Association www.americanheart.org/statistics

  14. Hoekstra JW, Gibler WB, Levy RC, et al. Emergency department diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and ischemia: a cost analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 1994;1:103–110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. IOM Report (www.iom.edu) : For report (http://www.nap.edu)

  16. Kelen GD, Scheulen JJ, et al. Effect of an ED managed acute care unit on ED overcrowding and emergency medical services diversion. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(11):1095–1100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerns JR, Shaub TF, Fontanarosa PB. Emergency cardiac stress testing in the evaluation of emergency department patients with atypical chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:794–798.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee TH, et al. Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol. 1987;(60):219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee TH, et al. Evaluation of the Patient with Acute Chest Pain. NEJM. 2000;342(16):1187–1193.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee G, Cook EF, et al. Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to the Emergency Departments with acute chest pain. NEJM. 1996;334:1498–1504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez E, Reilly BM, et al. The observation unit: a new interface between inpatient and outpatient care. Am J Med. 2001;110(4):274–277.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mikhail MG, Smith FA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of mandatory stress testing in chest pain center patients. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;(29):88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nawar EW, Niska RW, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 Emergency Department Summary Advance data from vital and health statistics; no. 386. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pope JH, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. NEJM. 2000;342:1163–1170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pozen MW, D’Agostino RB, Mitchell JB, et al. The usefulness of a predictive instrument to reduce inappropriate admissions to the coronary care unit. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92:239–242.

    Google Scholar 

  26. PozenMW, D’Agostino RB, Selker HP, et al. A predictive instrument to improve coronary care unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease: a multi-center clinical trial. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:1273–1278.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reilly B, et al. Impact of a clinical decision rule on hospital triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. JAMA. 2002;288:342–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reilly B, et al. Performance and potential impact of a chest pain prediction rule in a large public hospital. Am J Med. 1999;106:285–291.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roberts RR, Zalenski RJ, Mensah EK, et al. Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278:1670–1676.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodriquez S, Cowfer JP, Lyston DJ, et al. Clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of rapid emergency department rule out myocardial infarction and non invasive cardiac evaluation in patients with acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994:23(suppl);284A.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ross MA, Wilson AG, McPherson M. The impact of an ED observation bed on inpatient bed availability. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(5):576.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ross MA, Amsterdam E, et al. Chest Pain center accreditation is associated with better performance of centers for Medicare and Medicaid services core measures for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(2): 120–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rusnack RA, Stair TO, Hansen K, et al. Litigation against the emergency physician: common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18:1029–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rydman R J, Zalenski RJ, Roberts RR, et al. Patient satisfaction with an Emergency Department Chest Pain Observation Unit. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;(29):109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sayre MR, Bender AL, Chayan C, et al. Evaluating chest pain patients in an emergency department rapid diagnostic and treatment center is cost effective. Acad EMerg Med. 1994;1:A45.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Selker HP, et al. Use of the Acute Cardiac Ischemia Time-Insensitive Predictive Instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:845–855.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Stommel R, Grant R, Eagle KA. Lessons learned from a community hospital chest pain center. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:1033–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tatum J, et al. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;Jan(29):116–125.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Trappe K, Jackson RE, Ross M. A significant portion of patients admitted from a chest pain observation unit have cardiac pathology. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:S8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wilkinson K, Severance H. Identification of chest pain patients appropriate for an emergency department observation unit. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001;19(1):35–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zalenski RJ, Rydman RJ, et al. A National Survey of Emergency Department Chest Pain centers in the United States. Am J Cardiol. 1998;(81):1305–1309.

    Google Scholar 

  42. PEPPER (Program for Evaluation Payment Patterns Electronic Report) Website:http://www.cfmc.org/review/review_pepper.htm

  43. RAC (Recovery Audit Contractor) http://www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC/Downloads/RAC_Demonstration_Evaluation_Report.pdf

  44. Society of Chest Pain Center website: www.scpcp.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annitha Annathurai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Annathurai, A., Ross, M.A. (2009). Why Have a Chest Pain Unit?. In: Cannon, C., Peacock, W. (eds) Short Stay Management of Chest Pain. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-948-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-948-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-60327-947-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-60327-948-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics